-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 207
Updating EMTF NN to v1.0.1 #10191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updating EMTF NN to v1.0.1 #10191
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @pallabidas for branch IB/CMSSW_16_0_X/master. @akritkbehera, @cmsbuild, @iarspider, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-339024/49422/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
please test |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-339024/49440/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
@pallabidas , any idea why we get over 15K DQM comparison failures (https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_16_0_X_2025-11-13-1100+339024/71714/validateJR.html ) |
|
hi @smuzaffar is the failure from this PR? I only added the namespace as suggested in cms-sw/cmssw#49325 , you can see the changes here: cms-hls4ml/EMTF_NN@279f6b5 |
|
please test @pallabidas , I ran PR tests twice and botjh times there were over 15K DQM differences. I have started tests here again and also at #10193 to see if I get these difference in both tests or not |
|
ok, also asking @thesps if you have seen this type of behaviour before? |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-339024/49457/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
@pallabidas , I again see DQM differences here while tests for #10193 (comment) show no differences I am afraid the DQM changes are related to this chage |
|
the good news though is that the Phase-2 Tau P2GT results seem to be getting fixed: |
|
Pull request #10191 was updated. |
|
I've updated the package tag to v1.0.2 now. |
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
ok that explains it! thank you Marco! |
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Failed Unit TestsI found 1 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestIOPoolInputNoParentDictionary had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
failures are unrelated.
looking at the matrix of DQM bin-by-bin comparisons it is clear that all the workflows that use whereas the timing menu does not link, and so the effective list of event products available in the event as coming from the HLT reconstruction strongly depends on the L1T accepts. |
|
@smuzaffar please integrate this bug-fix at earliest convenience |
|
type bug-fix |
|
+externals |
e789536
into
cms-sw:IB/CMSSW_16_0_X/master
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_16_0_X/master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
EMTF NN model v1.0.1
model release: https://github.com/cms-hls4ml/EMTF_NN/releases/tag/v1.0.1