-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
[15_0_X, backport of #48104] NanoAODv15-Lite setup for Run2UL and 2022/2023 #48176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @hqucms for CMSSW_15_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@antoniovilela, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftorrresd, @hqucms, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
|
cms-bot internal usage |
SetupDATA2016preVFP DATA2016postVFP DATA2017 DATA2018 DATA2022/2023 DATAMC2016preVFP MC2016postVFP MC2017 MC2018 MC2022/2023 MCFor comparison with reMINI+NANO from AODRun2 DATA (reMINI+NANO from AOD)2022/2023 DATA (reMINI+NANO from AOD)Run2 MC (reMINI+NANO from AOD)2022/2023 MC (reMINI+NANO from AOD) |
|
please test with #48189 |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
enable nano |
|
please test with #48189 |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummaryThe workflows 2500.331, 2500.321, 2500.311, 2500.301 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_15_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_15_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
@hqucms Looking at the checklist in the PR description, there's still an incomplete item. Would you like us to hold off merging until that's done? |
Hi @mandrenguyen -- no, please go ahead and merge this. The GT is done outside the PR. I left it there just to remind ourselves :) |
|
+1 |
backport of #48104