Skip to content

Conversation

fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

just adding some simple -> bool annotations

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise and informative.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 21, 2025

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit c77e600; changes) is ready! 🎉
This preview will update shortly after each push to this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@dcoudert dcoudert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In future PRs we will have to unify the different forms: Test whether, Return True if, Determine whether, Return whether, Test if, etc.

Copy link
Contributor

@dcoudert dcoudert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor Author

merci !

vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2025
sagemathgh-40865: some typing -> bool for is_* methods
    
just adding some simple `-> bool` annotations

### 📝 Checklist

- [x] The title is concise and informative.
- [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
    
URL: sagemath#40865
Reported by: Frédéric Chapoton
Reviewer(s): David Coudert
@vbraun vbraun merged commit f933e1b into sagemath:develop Sep 27, 2025
23 of 25 checks passed
@fchapoton fchapoton deleted the typing_for_is branch September 29, 2025 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants