made edits to the "supporting" section #1721
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
clarified the roles of rubygems' major partners
|
cc @indirect |
|
closing in favor of #1722 |
|
@sonalkr132 because many people have said they were confused or unsure about this, I think it's a good idea to put this new, clearer explanation into both the readme and the site footer 👍 |
Merged
|
Sorry I took #1722 same as this because text was same. my bad! |
|
Hey, just a note that I had already opened #1720 to address this issue and used the language we agreed to with @evanphx in this PR: rubycentral/board#8. In the discussion above, I proposed agreeing on one set of language and using it consistently across all the places one would look for it. As such, I'm going to resolve the conflict in PR #1720 and propose we use that language here specifically. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi team,
Per rubycentral/board#5, I'm proposing updates to the "Supporting" section that clarifies the role of each major sponsor of RubyGems.org. This is one part of an ongoing effort to update messaging across RubyGems and Ruby Together. Thanks!