-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Build wisp from main HEAD (d96bd0e) as 0.5.10:1 test build #17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4ed9908
Update wisp to v0.5.6 (429/503 on WS upgrade connection-limit rejection)
kwsantiago f892de9
Merge pull request #2 from privkeyio/update-wisp-v0.5.6
MattDHill 4a9c4b2
Update wisp to v0.5.7 (shutdown use-after-free fix)
kwsantiago 7924a4a
Merge pull request #3 from privkeyio/update-wisp-v0.5.7
MattDHill 1778ea7
Update wisp to v0.5.9 (churn + shutdown crash fixes; folds in v0.5.8)
kwsantiago be897c7
Merge pull request #5 from privkeyio/update-wisp-v0.5.9
MattDHill a519daa
Update wisp to v0.5.10 (build against upstream http.zig; drop fork)
kwsantiago 93b9c35
Build wisp from main HEAD (d96bd0e) as 0.5.10:1 test build
wksantiago File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Pinning to
mainbranch instead of a tag breaks the documented pin contract.WISP_VERSION=mainis a moving branch, not a release tag, but the comment above (unchanged) still says "setARG WISP_VERSIONto the new tag (e.g.v0.3.0) andARG WISP_COMMITto the commit that tag points to" and the in-file comment claims this is "Pinned to the latest upstream release" with a guard against "the tag ever re-pointed" — there is no tag here. Since the clone uses--branch ${WISP_VERSION} --depth 1, it only fetches the current tip ofmain; as soon as upstreammainadvances pastd96bd0e, any rebuild will hard-fail the SHA guard (not just on a force-push/re-point). If this is intentionally a transient test build (per PR title), consider adding a comment clarifying that, or better, use a lightweight tag/ref that stays fixed to this exact commit so the guard's semantics match reality and the build doesn't silently break for anyone re-running it later.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents