Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #5371

/assign aabughosh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65544 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67006. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.19] OCPBUGS-67006: MCO-1886: add the missing service to the expose ports 22623 and 22624

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #5371

/assign aabughosh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.19] OCPBUGS-65544: MCO-1886: add the missing service to the expose ports 22623 and 22624 [release-4.19] OCPBUGS-67006: MCO-1886: add the missing service to the expose ports 22623 and 22624 Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67006, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65544 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65544 to target a version in 4.20.0, 4.20.z, but it targets "4.21.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #5371

/assign aabughosh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign rishabhsaini for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@aabughosh
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@aabughosh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67006, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65544 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65544 to target a version in 4.20.0, 4.20.z, but it targets "4.21.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@aabughosh
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@aabughosh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67006, which is invalid:

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@aabughosh
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@aabughosh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67006, which is invalid:

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@aabughosh
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@aabughosh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67006, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.19.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65544 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65544 targets the "4.20.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.20.0, 4.20.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sergiordlr

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from sergiordlr December 9, 2025 10:11
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/unit a2a1811 link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op a2a1811 link true /test e2e-gcp-op

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sergiordlr
Copy link
Contributor

Using AWS on IPI

$ oc -n openshift-machine-config-operator get service  |grep 22624
machine-config-server       ClusterIP   172.30.14.53     <none>        22623/TCP,22624/TCP   4h57m
$ oc -n openshift-machine-config-operator get service  |grep 22623
machine-config-server       ClusterIP   172.30.14.53     <none>        22623/TCP,22624/TCP   4h58m

/label qe-approved
/verified by @sergiordlr

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 10, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sergiordlr: This PR has been marked as verified by @sergiordlr.

In response to this:

Using AWS on IPI

$ oc -n openshift-machine-config-operator get service  |grep 22624
machine-config-server       ClusterIP   172.30.14.53     <none>        22623/TCP,22624/TCP   4h57m
$ oc -n openshift-machine-config-operator get service  |grep 22623
machine-config-server       ClusterIP   172.30.14.53     <none>        22623/TCP,22624/TCP   4h58m

/label qe-approved
/verified by @sergiordlr

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Dec 10, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67006, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.19.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65544 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65544 targets the "4.20.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.20.0, 4.20.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sergiordlr

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #5371

/assign aabughosh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the verification. Will hold this until #5480 merges so we can backport together if possible

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 11, 2025
@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

/close

In favour of #5490

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Dec 12, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 12, 2025

@yuqi-zhang: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

In favour of #5490

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67006. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #5371

/assign aabughosh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants