Skip to content

Conversation

@cardil
Copy link
Member

@cardil cardil commented Dec 3, 2024

Proposed Changes

  • 🐛 Check for empty pull-secrets on catalog-source pod

/kind bug

Ref.: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/CLUCMK7R6/p1733249078088419

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the kind/bug Something isn't working label Dec 3, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cardil
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign dsimansk for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@cardil cardil changed the title Check for empty pull-secrets 🐛 Check for empty pull-secrets Dec 3, 2024
@cardil
Copy link
Member Author

cardil commented Dec 3, 2024

/test 417-operator-e2e

@cardil cardil force-pushed the bugfix/jfne-catalogsource-dockercfg-pullsecret branch 2 times, most recently from fbf0056 to 6dd53f9 Compare December 3, 2024 19:24
@cardil
Copy link
Member Author

cardil commented Dec 3, 2024

/test 417-operator-e2e

@cardil cardil force-pushed the bugfix/jfne-catalogsource-dockercfg-pullsecret branch 2 times, most recently from 2b0700f to 8fbcaa1 Compare December 4, 2024 09:26
@cardil cardil force-pushed the bugfix/jfne-catalogsource-dockercfg-pullsecret branch from 8fbcaa1 to 9f1175a Compare December 4, 2024 10:40
@cardil
Copy link
Member Author

cardil commented Dec 4, 2024

/test all

@cardil cardil marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2024 17:57
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from pierDipi and rhuss December 6, 2024 17:57
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2025

@cardil: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/418-test-upgrade 9f1175a link true /test 418-test-upgrade
ci/prow/418-operator-e2e 9f1175a link true /test 418-operator-e2e
ci/prow/420-test-upgrade 9f1175a link true /test 420-test-upgrade
ci/prow/420-operator-e2e 9f1175a link true /test 420-operator-e2e
ci/prow/419-test-upgrade 9f1175a link true /test 419-test-upgrade
ci/prow/419-operator-e2e 9f1175a link true /test 419-operator-e2e

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind/bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant