chore: patch frontend-build deployment

[leangseu-edx]

This pr is similar to openedx/frontend-app-learner-record#302

The can be remove once openedx/frontend-build#515 is merged

[BrandonHBodine]

What is the intent of using this package for?

[leangseu-edx]

patch-package will try to read @openedx+frontend-build+13.0.30.patch file after install. If you look at the file @openedx+frontend-build+13.0.30.patch, it is just telling node_module/@openedx/frontend-build to update specific file. Essentially the change for the that was just so webpack would pick up JS_CONFIG_FILEPATH environment variable

[BrandonHBodine]

Interesting; this does seem pretty complex though. What's the need for injecting this patch code here instead of updating the https://github.com/openedx/frontend-build package?

[BrandonHBodine]

NVM, I see that this is a temporary fix for that pr in the frontend-build like you mention in the PR description,

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.25%. Comparing base (9423a88) to head (eafd3c0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1350   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.25%   88.25%           
=======================================
  Files         293      293           
  Lines        4997     4997           
  Branches     1267     1264    -3     
=======================================
  Hits         4410     4410           
  Misses        571      571           
  Partials       16       16           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[arbrandes]

@leangseu-edx, we're probably going to have to remove this unless a compelling reason is found for this .env variable to exist in the first place. See openedx/frontend-build#515 (comment).

[bradenmacdonald]

@leangseu-edx @arbrandes Is this patch still doing anything? I'd like to remove it, but it's unclear if it's still useful or not.

[bradenmacdonald]

@jsnwesson Do you know if this patch can be removed?

[arbrandes]

@bradenmacdonald, we should create a PR to remove it and give 2U a couple of days to review it. Are you up for it, or should I?

[bradenmacdonald]

@arbrandes Sure! I've opened it: #1621 - but could you please help me get it reviewed?