-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Challenge 16: Iterator #260
Add Challenge 16: Iterator #260
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm curious why some of these challenges are focused on correctness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- You'll need to add links to these challenge files in SUMMARY.md as well.
- I don't think we should merge any challenges about correctness--this effort is about safety, and we should stay focused on that goal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! See my comment above about reward amounts; we still shouldn't merge this yet, but on the technical side we're good to go.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
trigger approval check
9da1baa
In this PR, I add a challenge for Iterator functions in (library/core/src/iter/adapters)
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.