Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Challenges 17 18 for slices #265

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Apr 3, 2025

Conversation

thanhnguyen-aws
Copy link

@thanhnguyen-aws thanhnguyen-aws commented Mar 6, 2025

This PR adds:

  1. Challenge 17 : for slice functions
  2. Chalenge 18: for slice-iter's functions generated by macros

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.

@thanhnguyen-aws thanhnguyen-aws requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2025 18:00
Co-authored-by: Michael Tautschnig <[email protected]>
Copy link

@carolynzech carolynzech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One more thing, then re-request my review and I'll approve.

@carolynzech carolynzech self-assigned this Mar 27, 2025
@carolynzech carolynzech self-requested a review March 27, 2025 16:19
@carolynzech carolynzech removed their assignment Mar 27, 2025
@carolynzech
Copy link

@thanhnguyen-aws Please update the PR description/title to remove mention of challenge 19 and change the reward amounts to $10,000, per the rewards committee.

@thanhnguyen-aws thanhnguyen-aws changed the title Add Challenges 17 18 19 for slices Add Challenges 17 18 for slices Apr 3, 2025
@carolynzech carolynzech enabled auto-merge April 3, 2025 16:10
@carolynzech carolynzech added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into model-checking:main with commit d2b6a64 Apr 3, 2025
15 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants