Skip to content

Conversation

@Alex-Rw2
Copy link

@Alex-Rw2 Alex-Rw2 commented Jan 3, 2026

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Your solution is functionally correct and handles all the state transformations well, which is great! However, this requires a change because the implementation uses if statements to handle the different action types. A specific requirement for this task is to use a switch statement for this kind of conditional logic [CHECKLIST ITEM #2]. Please refactor your code to use a switch on action.type. This change will also make it straightforward to add a default case to handle unknown actions, which is another requirement [CHECKLIST ITEM #3].


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Important

Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.

Tip

If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.

Caution

Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example

  2. Re-request AI review example

  3. Add AI review comments example

Comment on lines +17 to +38
if (action.type === 'clear') {
nextState = {};
} else {
nextState = { ...currentState };
}

if (
action.type === 'removeProperties' &&
Array.isArray(action.keysToRemove)
) {
for (const key of action.keysToRemove) {
delete nextState[key];
}
}

if (
action.type === 'addProperties' &&
typeof action.extraData === 'object' &&
action.extraData !== null
) {
Object.assign(nextState, action.extraData);
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This implementation uses multiple if statements to handle the different action types. This violates checklist item #2, which requires using a switch statement. Refactoring to a switch on action.type will also make it easier to add a default case for error handling, as required by checklist item #3.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants