Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fn: optimize context guard #9361

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

starius
Copy link
Collaborator

@starius starius commented Dec 14, 2024

Change Description

Simplifies context cancellation handling by using context.AfterFunc instead of a goroutine to wait for context cancellation. This approach avoids the overhead of a goroutine during the waiting period.

Additional changes:

  • added test of blocking context cancelling
  • removed unneeded argument cancel of ctxBlocking
  • clear store of cancel funcs after quitting
  • test that the Create method does not launch any goroutines

Steps to Test

cd fn
go test -race

Pull Request Checklist

Testing

  • Your PR passes all CI checks.
  • Tests covering the positive and negative (error paths) are included.
  • Bug fixes contain tests triggering the bug to prevent regressions.

Code Style and Documentation

📝 Please see our Contribution Guidelines for further guidance.

@starius starius requested a review from guggero December 14, 2024 18:23
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 14, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@starius starius force-pushed the optimize-context-guard branch from 1f042cd to b22cc4f Compare December 14, 2024 19:19
@starius starius requested a review from ellemouton December 14, 2024 19:20
@starius starius marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2024 01:02
Copy link
Collaborator

@guggero guggero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice optimizations, LGTM 🎉

}()
// We don't have to wait on g.quit here: g.quit can be closed only in
// Quit method, which also closes the context we are waiting for.
context.AfterFunc(ctx, func() {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't really remove any overhead (since AterContext() calls propagateCancel() which creates the same "wait for context cancel" goroutine. But it's much simpler to read, so nice optimization in any case.
Also nice catch that with the g.quit now being un-exported, we can skip that code path as well.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

propagateCancel() which creates the same "wait for context cancel" goroutine

When the context is derived from cancelCtx (the most common case), propagateCancel avoids starting additional waiting goroutines. The cancelCtx type has an internal mechanism to track its child contexts, allowing it to recursively cancel all children when the parent context is canceled.

I added the test TestContextGuardCountGoroutines to verify that the Create method does not start any waiting goroutines. Without this optimization, the test would initiate 4000 new goroutines.

It's worth noting that a goroutine is indeed started later during context cancellation. However, it immediately calls wg.Done() and completes, so it doesn't exist throughout the context's lifetime. While the number of goroutines remains the same, their total runtime is significantly reduced, improving efficiency.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, right, that makes sense. Should've looked at the code in propagateCancel more closely I guess 🙈 Thanks for the clarification! And the additional unit test.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this PR! @starius I understand the core change is to use context.AfterFunc instead of a goroutine for context cancellation handling, which should reduce overhead.

Without this optimization, the test would initiate 4000 new goroutines.

I'm trying to understand what you mean by this.
Are you referring to starting a goroutine for each context created here (in the test)?

// Create 1000 contexts of each type.
	for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ {
		_, _ = g.Create(ctx)
		_, _ = g.Create(ctx, WithBlockingCG())
		_, _ = g.Create(ctx, WithTimeoutCG())
		_, _ = g.Create(ctx, WithBlockingCG(), WithTimeoutCG())
	}

Additionally, the addition of the test is great. Overall, this looks like a solid improvement.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you referring to starting a goroutine for each context created here (in the test)?

Yes.

@saubyk saubyk added this to the v0.19.0 milestone Dec 19, 2024
@lightninglabs-deploy
Copy link

@ellemouton: review reminder
@starius, remember to re-request review from reviewers when ready

Copy link
Collaborator

@ellemouton ellemouton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! perhaps also open a draft PR that points to this so we can make sure itests pass before merging this

fn/context_guard.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
// TestContextGuardCountGoroutines makes sure that ContextGuard doesn't create
// any goroutines while waiting for contexts.
func TestContextGuardCountGoroutines(t *testing.T) {
g := NewContextGuard()
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: add t.Parallel()

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

t.Parallel() is not invoked in this test because it relies on an accurate count of active goroutines. Running other tests in parallel would introduce additional goroutines, leading to unreliable results.

I added a NOTE to the test.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah! makes sense 🙏

Make sure WgWait() doesn't block.
Removed 'cancel' argument, because it is called only in case the context has
already expired and the only action that cancel function did was cancelling the
context.
If ContextGuard lives for some time after Quit method is called, the map won't
be collected by GC. Optimization.
Simplifies context cancellation handling by using context.AfterFunc instead of a
goroutine to wait for context cancellation. This approach avoids the overhead of
a goroutine during the waiting period.

For ctxQuitUnsafe, since g.quit is closed only in the Quit method (which also
cancels all associated contexts), waiting on context cancellation ensures the
same behavior without unnecessary dependency on g.quit.

Added a test to ensure that the Create method does not launch any goroutines.
@starius starius force-pushed the optimize-context-guard branch from b22cc4f to 07c4668 Compare January 2, 2025 13:39
@starius starius mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2025
8 tasks
@starius
Copy link
Collaborator Author

starius commented Jan 2, 2025

@ellemouton I created a draft PR pointing to this version of fn/v2: #9401

I updated htlcswitch and included #9342 to fix compilation errors.

Waiting for itests.

@starius
Copy link
Collaborator Author

starius commented Jan 3, 2025

itests in #9401 are green, except some itests which haven't run:

  • run ubuntu itests (bitcoind-notxindex, backend="bitcoind notxindex")
  • run ubuntu itests (bitcoind-rpcpolling, backend="bitcoind rpcpolling" cover=1)
  • run ubuntu itests (btcd, backend=btcd cover=1)
  • run ubuntu itests (neutrino, backend=neutrino cover=1)

@starius starius requested a review from ellemouton January 3, 2025 15:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants