chapter 03 - destructors

[lauti7]

Maybe I'm wrong or misunderstanding something

[jonhoo]

If I understand you correctly, the thing that confused you here is that it's not clear that the "empty" in the last sentence refers to the same thing as "cheap-to-construct default values", is that right?

[LeoniePhiline]

I also found this section confusing and wished for a clearer separation between discussing

• Option::take, leaving None and
• std::mem::take, leaving Default::default

as techniques at hand.

Each with their benefits and downsides, such as requiring tedious boilerplate or operating on unexpectedly empty collections.

Furthermore, the section speaks about “options” one has, while also discussing Options. This could be rephrased as “possibilities”, “approaches” or “techniques”.

[lauti7]

If I understand you correctly, the thing that confused you here is that it's not clear that the "empty" in the last sentence refers to the same thing as "cheap-to-construct default values", is that right?

Yep, maybe it's that or the way that it's mixing the std::mem::take with Option::take. I think that @LeoniePhiline is also good!

[jonhoo]

Sorry for taking so long on this! How do you feel about this proposed change?

[lauti7]

I forgot about this PR, let's merge it! Thank u for the suggestion