Skip to content

Conversation

@batmat
Copy link
Member

@batmat batmat commented Dec 1, 2018

No JIRA deemed needed.

Depends on #3783 on purpose (#3783 should be merged ideally for the previous weekly release).

This PR currently aims at testing jenkinsci/pom#36 and uses a timestamped SNAPSHOT.

Proposed changelog entries

  • Internal: Update to parent pom 1.51 with extra-enforcer-rules update to 1.1 to support JDK 11 bytecode

Submitter checklist

- [ ] JIRA issue is well described

  • Changelog entry appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developer, depending on the change). Examples
    * Use the Internal: prefix if the change has no user-visible impact (API, test frameworks, etc.)
  • Appropriate autotests or explanation to why this change has no tests
  • For dependency updates: links to external changelogs and, if possible, full diffs

Desired reviewers

@jenkinsci/java11-support

As 1.51 is upcoming, main goal here is to get an intermediate release
with 1.50 in case we have data in case things go wrong with one or another
and more quickly figure if this is likely to be coming from 1.50 or 1.51.
@batmat batmat added work-in-progress The PR is under active development, not ready to the final review on-hold This pull request depends on another event/release, and it cannot be merged right now labels Dec 1, 2018
@batmat batmat closed this Dec 3, 2018
@batmat batmat reopened this Dec 3, 2018
@batmat batmat closed this Dec 7, 2018
@batmat batmat deleted the bump-to-extra-enforcer-rules-1.1 branch December 7, 2018 13:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

on-hold This pull request depends on another event/release, and it cannot be merged right now work-in-progress The PR is under active development, not ready to the final review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant