Update PR data Daily collection (2025-08-13 01:41 UTC) #157
Conversation
WalkthroughData refresh across PR tracking files: one PR’s state toggled to MERGED in all_prs.json; corresponding entries removed from failing_prs.json and open_prs.json; junit5_candidate_prs.txt timestamp updated with substantial additions, removals, status changes, and reordering. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @gounthar, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request provides the daily automated update of pull request statistics data. It reflects the current state of various Jenkins plugin pull requests, particularly those related to JUnit 5 migration efforts, and updates the list of failing pull requests. This automated update ensures that the tracked data remains current.
Highlights
- Failing PRs Update: A specific failing PR entry for
jenkinsci/probely-security-pluginPR #9 has been removed from thefailing_prs.jsonfile, indicating its resolution or change in status. - New JUnit 5 Migration PRs: Several new 'OPEN' pull requests related to JUnit 5 migration have been added across various Jenkins plugins, reflecting ongoing efforts to modernize testing frameworks.
- JUnit 5 Migration Progress: The status of existing JUnit 5 migration pull requests has been updated, with some moving from 'OPEN' to 'MERGED' or 'CLOSED', showcasing progress in these migration initiatives.
- Data File Maintenance: The
junit5_candidate_prs.txtfile has been reordered and maintained to reflect the latest daily data collection, ensuring the list remains current and organized.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request contains automated updates to PR statistics data. The changes involve removing a pull request from the failing_prs.json file, which is appropriate if it's no longer failing. The junit5_candidate_prs.txt file has also been updated with new candidate PRs and reordered, which appears to be part of the automated data collection process. The changes seem correct and in line with the purpose of this automated job.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
data/consolidated/all_prs.json (2)
17065-17071: Reduce denormalization: derive open/failing views from all_prs.json at build time.Maintaining the same PR in multiple files (all/open/failing) invites drift. Consider generating open_prs.json and failing_prs.json from all_prs.json in the pipeline to ensure atomic updates and consistency.
17065-17071: Optional schema enhancement: include mergedAt for analytics fidelity.Since the state is MERGED, adding a mergedAt timestamp would enable accurate lead/cycle time calculations without overloading updatedAt semantics.
junit5_candidate_prs.txt (1)
1-6: Add an automated validation step to the data refresh workflowTo prevent drift between this list and actual PR states, add a CI check that:
- Parses this file,
- Verifies each PR state via GitHub API as in the scripts above,
- Fails the job when mismatches are found.
I can provide a reusable GitHub Actions step if desired.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
data/consolidated/all_prs.json(1 hunks)data/consolidated/failing_prs.json(0 hunks)data/consolidated/open_prs.json(0 hunks)junit5_candidate_prs.txt(17 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- data/consolidated/open_prs.json
- data/consolidated/failing_prs.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
junit5_candidate_prs.txt (1)
cmd/find-junit5-prs/main.go (1)
isJUnit5MigrationPR(372-501)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
data/consolidated/all_prs.json (1)
17065-17071: No stale metadata; PR #9 remains OPENThe inspection shows PR #9’s state is still “OPEN” and
updatedAt(2025-03-31T08:42:25Z) is newer thancreatedAt(2025-03-28T21:29:34Z), so there’s no stale timestamp or missing merge event. The original suggestion to update or documentupdatedAtfor a MERGED state does not apply here.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
junit5_candidate_prs.txt (4)
1-1: Header timestamp refresh looks correctTimestamp matches the PR title’s reported run time. No issues.
607-609: All CLOSED entries verified as still closed and unmerged
Both PR #13 (jenkinsci/eddsa-api-plugin) and PR #434 (jenkinsci/tekton-client-plugin) remain closed with no merge. No further action needed.
235-237: All MERGED entries confirmedThe verification script has been run against each URL listed, and every pull request is indeed closed with
merged=true. No entries have been reopened.Affected locations in junit5_candidate_prs.txt:
- Lines 235–237
- Lines 238–240
- Lines 244–246
- Lines 271–273
- Lines 448–450
- Lines 514–516
- Lines 649–651
- Lines 955–957
- Lines 964–966
- Lines 1099–1101
No further action is required.
4-21: All OPEN pull requests verified
All listed Jenkinsci plugin PRs remain in the OPEN state on GitHub—no entries have closed or been merged.– jenkinsci/mailer-plugin#384
– jenkinsci/lockable-resources-plugin#805
– jenkinsci/workflow-multibranch-plugin#385
– jenkinsci/config-file-provider-plugin#392
– jenkinsci/ant-plugin#171
– jenkinsci/jackson2-api-plugin#309
This PR contains automatically updated PR statistics data. Generated by GitHub Actions.
Summary by CodeRabbit