Update PR data Daily collection (2025-08-15 01:42 UTC) #159
Conversation
WalkthroughUpdates the junit5_candidate_prs.txt manifest: header timestamp changed; multiple PR entries added; several entries reordered/moved; statuses noted (OPEN/MERGED). No source code changes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip 🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @gounthar, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request is an automated update to the junit5_candidate_prs.txt file, which tracks JUnit 5 migration pull request statistics. The primary changes involve updating the timestamp to reflect the latest data collection and reordering existing entries within the file to maintain consistency and organization. This ensures the list of PR candidates is current and properly structured for ongoing tracking.
Highlights
- Timestamp Update: The timestamp at the top of the
junit5_candidate_prs.txtfile has been updated to reflect the latest data collection time. - Data Reordering: The order of several JUnit 5 migration PR candidates and their associated URLs has been adjusted within the
junit5_candidate_prs.txtfile. This reordering affects both open and merged pull requests across numerous Jenkins plugins.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request contains an automated daily update of JUnit 5 migration candidate pull requests. The changes include updating the timestamp, adding new PRs, and reordering existing entries. While the data update is correct, the resulting file junit5_candidate_prs.txt has an inconsistent sorting order, which makes it difficult to navigate. I've added a comment with a suggestion to improve the sorting for better maintainability.
| @@ -1,15 +1,21 @@ | |||
| # JUnit 5 migration PR candidates found on 2025-08-14 01:41:34 | |||
| # JUnit 5 migration PR candidates found on 2025-08-15 01:42:12 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The list of pull requests in this file is not consistently sorted. It appears to be partially sorted, but new entries are appended, and there's no clear grouping by status (OPEN, MERGED, CLOSED) or alphabetical order. This makes the file difficult to read and maintain.
To improve readability, it would be beneficial to apply a consistent sorting order to the entire file. For example, you could group entries by their status (e.g., OPEN, MERGED, CLOSED) and then sort them alphabetically by repository name within each group. This would require modifying the generation script to sort the final list before writing it to the file.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
junit5_candidate_prs.txt (1)
1-1272: Action: normalize "JUnit" capitalization and confirm header statuses in junit5_candidate_prs.txtSummary of verification:
- All URLs have a preceding header — OK.
- No duplicate URLs found — OK.
- Headers lacking status suffix: junit5_candidate_prs.txt — lines 1 and 2 (file-level notes).
- Capitalization counts: "JUnit 5" = 15, "JUnit5" = 309, "junit5" = 4.
Required fixes:
- junit5_candidate_prs.txt — normalize capitalization to a single form (recommend "JUnit 5"). Replace 309 "JUnit5" + 4 "junit5" occurrences with "JUnit 5".
- Confirm intent for headers: lines 1–2 are file-level notes and can omit a (OPEN|MERGED|CLOSED) suffix; if they are meant to be PR entries, append the appropriate status and ensure each "# … (STATUS)" header is followed by a single URL.
No action needed:
- URL presence/preceding-header check passed.
- No duplicate URLs detected.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
junit5_candidate_prs.txt (3)
244-246: Standardize “JUnit 5” capitalization (generator-level)Found at least one entry using “junit5” instead of “JUnit 5”. Recommend normalizing casing to reduce noise in diffs and improve searchability.
Example here:
- “gravatar-plugin - Migrate tests to junit5 (OPEN)”
If you prefer a quick one-off fix for this line, apply:
-# jenkinsci/gravatar-plugin - Migrate tests to junit5 (OPEN) +# jenkinsci/gravatar-plugin - Migrate tests to JUnit 5 (OPEN)Longer term, consider normalizing to “JUnit 5” in the action that generates this manifest.
1-3: Consider stable sorting and de-dup policy to reduce churnEntries appear appended/moved across updates. For minimal diff churn and easier reviews, consider:
- Stable grouping: OPEN first, then MERGED, then CLOSED
- Within each group: sort by repo name, then PR number
- Optionally collapse duplicate PRs with identical repo+PR number (keep latest line only)
This change should be applied in the generator, not by hand.
1279-1281: Normalize or mirror upstream title typo ("depracted" → "deprecated")The file reproduces the upstream PR title with a misspelling — decide whether the generator should mirror upstream exactly or apply a lightweight spelling normalization.
- junit5_candidate_prs.txt:1279 — current: "jenkinsci/android-signing-plugin - Remove depracted method JUnit Assert.assertThat (MERGED)"
- Suggested normalization: "jenkinsci/android-signing-plugin - Remove deprecated method JUnit Assert.assertThat (MERGED)"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
junit5_candidate_prs.txt(17 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
junit5_candidate_prs.txt (1)
jenkins-pr-collector.go (1)
Nodes(838-846)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
junit5_candidate_prs.txt (2)
1-1: Header timestamp update LGTMAutomated timestamp looks correct and follows the established format.
1031-1032: Confirm scope: non-migration PRs included intentionally?Quick summary: junit5_candidate_prs.txt has 458 "# " entries; 313 match the suggested /(Migrate|Upgrade).*(JUnit ?5|junit5)/i; 145 do not.
Non-matching examples from the file:
- unrelated dependency bumps: "tuleap-git-branch-source-plugin - ... Bump okhttp", "envinject-plugin - build: bump ivy", "bom - chore(deps): bump apache-httpcomponents-client-5-api"
- JUnit5-related but not labeled "Migrate/Upgrade": "jenkins-test-harness - Add JUnit5 equivalents of JUnit4 Rule implementations", "job-config-history-plugin - Use junit5 parallel execution", "configuration-as-code-plugin - Provide JUnit5 compatible alternative..."
Recommendation: clarify desired scope.
- For an explicit “migration” manifest, filter to titles matching: /(Migrate|Upgrade).*(JUnit ?5|junit5)/i
- For a broader JUnit5-related manifest, filter to: /\b(junit ?5|junit5|junit-jupiter|junit-jupiter-engine)\b/i
Please confirm which scope you want so I can update the list accordingly.
This PR contains automatically updated PR statistics data. Generated by GitHub Actions.
Summary by CodeRabbit