Skip to content

Conversation

@gounthar
Copy link
Owner

@gounthar gounthar commented Aug 9, 2025

This PR contains automatically updated PR statistics data. Generated by GitHub Actions.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated and standardized metadata, descriptions, labels, and timestamps for JUnit5 migration and dependency update pull requests.
    • Corrected and reordered entries in the JUnit5 candidate PRs list, including moving some entries between sections and updating formatting.
    • Added a new entry for a merged dependency update.
    • No changes to application logic or user-facing functionality.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 9, 2025

Walkthrough

This update modifies two metadata files tracking JUnit5 migration pull requests and dependency bumps for Jenkins plugins. The changes include reordering entries, updating labels, timestamps, URLs, and descriptions, as well as correcting and standardizing metadata. No code logic or exported entities are affected.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
JUnit5 PR Metadata Updates
data/junit5/junit5_candidates.json
Updated and reordered PR metadata: removed draft prefixes, swapped URLs and repo names, adjusted timestamps, changed labels, restored a previously removed entry, updated dependency bump descriptions, and added a new merged PR for embeddable-build-status. Only metadata was changed.
JUnit5 Candidate List Reordering
junit5_candidate_prs.txt
Updated header timestamp and reordered several plugin PR entries, moving some between open and merged sections. No changes to URLs, plugin names, or migration statuses. Plain text list update only.

Sequence Diagram(s)

No sequence diagram is generated, as the changes are limited to metadata and list reordering without control flow or feature logic.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐇
In rows and columns, PRs realign,
Timestamps and labels now neatly combine.
URLs swapped and entries restored,
Metadata polished, never ignored.
Though no code changed in this gentle sweep,
The garden of data is tidy and neat!
🌱✨

Note

🔌 MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available in Early Access!

Pro users can now connect to remote MCP servers under the Integrations page to get reviews and chat conversations that understand additional development context.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch auto-update-pr-data

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @gounthar, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request provides an automated daily update of the repository's pull request statistics, specifically focusing on the ongoing JUnit5 migration efforts. It ensures that the data reflecting the status and details of these migration-related PRs is kept up-to-date, removing outdated information and reordering entries for clarity and accuracy.

Highlights

  • Automated Data Update: This PR is an automated daily update, ensuring that the collected pull request statistics data, particularly for JUnit5 migration candidates, is current and accurate.
  • PR Status Updates: The 'Draft' status and associated dependency notes have been removed from the descriptions of several JUnit5 migration pull requests, indicating progress or resolution of those specific PRs.
  • Data Synchronization: Various details such as URLs, repositories, creation timestamps, and labels for tracked pull requests have been updated and reordered to reflect the latest information.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request contains automated daily updates to the PR statistics data. The changes in data/junit5/junit5_candidates.json and junit5_candidate_prs.txt are consistent and reflect updates to PR states, body cleanup, and reordering of entries. The changes appear to be correct as per the automated process. No issues were found.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
data/junit5/junit5_candidates.json (2)

1171-1173: Label updates: test ↔ maintenance. Verify these mirror GH labels.

If labels mirror GitHub exactly, keep as-is. If you intend normalized categories, consider a mapping layer instead of changing raw data.

Would you like a small post-processing step that normalizes labels while retaining originals?

Also applies to: 1176-1176, 1179-1179, 1183-1185, 1188-1188, 1191-1191


2261-2263: Labels differ: "test" vs "tests". Confirm intentional.

If these are distinct GH labels, keep them. If not, consider standardizing.

Also applies to: 2266-2266, 2269-2269, 2273-2275, 2278-2278, 2281-2281

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b8a8d64 and 97ba860.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • data/junit5/junit5_candidates.json (10 hunks)
  • junit5_candidate_prs.txt (8 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-03-07T16:15:13.008Z
Learnt from: gounthar
PR: gounthar/alpha-omega-stats#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-03-07T16:15:13.008Z
Learning: The jenkins-pr-collector should log all PRs found, not just the ones with specific strings like "odernizer" in the body.

Applied to files:

  • junit5_candidate_prs.txt
  • data/junit5/junit5_candidates.json
📚 Learning: 2025-03-07T16:15:13.008Z
Learnt from: gounthar
PR: gounthar/alpha-omega-stats#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-03-07T16:15:13.008Z
Learning: For the jenkins-pr-collector tool, all PRs should be logged, not just those with specific keywords like "odernizer" or "recipe" in the body text.

Applied to files:

  • junit5_candidate_prs.txt
  • data/junit5/junit5_candidates.json
🔇 Additional comments (15)
junit5_candidate_prs.txt (7)

103-105: Reordered entry looks correct

hashicorp-vault-plugin JUnit5 migration PR is correctly listed with status OPEN and the right URL.


157-159: Credentials plugin entry OK

URL and OPEN status for credentials-plugin PR #600 look consistent.


340-342: Naginator plugin marked MERGED

Marking PR #164 as MERGED here is appropriate.


388-390: Eggplant runner plugin entry OK

eggplant-runner-plugin PR #76 correctly marked as MERGED.


622-624: Authorize Project plugin entry OK

authorize-project-plugin PR #301 correctly marked as MERGED.


904-906: Closed dependency bump recorded

tekton-client-plugin PR #434 is correctly recorded as CLOSED alongside newer bumps.


1003-1005: BOM: embeddable-build-status bump marked MERGED

bom PR #5484 is properly listed as MERGED.

data/junit5/junit5_candidates.json (8)

20-20: Duplicate JUnit 5 migration body — OK to keep verbatim.

Content mirrors source PR templates; no action needed.


30-30: Consistent body text retained — OK.

No JSON escaping issues detected.


325-327: URL↔repository corrections look right.

variant-plugin and hashicorp-vault-plugin entries now match their URLs and repos; timestamps are plausible.

Also applies to: 331-331, 335-337, 341-341


505-507: Repo/URL swaps for BFA and credentials — OK.

Both entries align; bodies preserved; timestamps consistent.

Also applies to: 510-511, 515-517, 520-521


1363-1372: New merged entry for eggplant-runner-plugin — looks correct.

URL, repo, and merged state align; body/template consistent.


3737-3748: New merged BOM entry (embeddable-build-status) — OK.

Fields consistent; label “developer” acceptable if mirroring upstream.


10-10: Approve PR metadata consistency in data/junit5/junit5_candidates.json

All automated checks passed with no discrepancies found:

  • URL ↔ repository alignment is correct
  • createdAt timestamps conform to ISO-8601 Z format
  • state values are one of OPEN, MERGED, or CLOSED
  • labels, when present, are arrays

No further action required.


3333-3344: Status verification complete: PR states are accurate

Verified via GitHub CLI that:

No updates needed.

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# JUnit 5 migration PR candidates found on 2025-08-08 01:45:25
# JUnit 5 migration PR candidates found on 2025-08-09 01:39:26
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Add explicit timezone and ensure deterministic ordering

Append "UTC" to the timestamp for clarity and consider enforcing a stable sort (e.g., by status, repo, PR number) to minimize noisy reorders in daily updates.

You can quickly verify statuses for the changed entries with:

Apply this minor header tweak:

-# JUnit 5 migration PR candidates found on 2025-08-09 01:39:26
+# JUnit 5 migration PR candidates found on 2025-08-09 01:39:26 UTC

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

# Optionally set GITHUB_TOKEN to raise rate limits:
# export GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_xxx

auth=()
if [[ -n "${GITHUB_TOKEN:-}" ]]; then
  auth=(-H "Authorization: Bearer $GITHUB_TOKEN")
fi

# repo pr expected_status
entries=(
  "jenkinsci/hashicorp-vault-plugin 346 OPEN"
  "jenkinsci/credentials-plugin 600 OPEN"
  "jenkinsci/naginator-plugin 164 MERGED"
  "jenkinsci/eggplant-runner-plugin 76 MERGED"
  "jenkinsci/authorize-project-plugin 301 MERGED"
  "jenkinsci/tekton-client-plugin 434 CLOSED"
  "jenkinsci/bom 5484 MERGED"
)

fail=0
for t in "${entries[@]}"; do
  repo=$(awk '{print $1}' <<<"$t")
  pr=$(awk '{print $2}' <<<"$t")
  expected=$(awk '{print $3}' <<<"$t")

  json=$(curl -s "${auth[@]}" "https://api.github.com/repos/${repo}/pulls/${pr}")
  state=$(jq -r '.state' <<<"$json")
  merged_at=$(jq -r '.merged_at' <<<"$json")

  actual="UNKNOWN"
  if [[ "$state" == "open" ]]; then
    actual="OPEN"
  elif [[ "$state" == "closed" && "$merged_at" != "null" ]]; then
    actual="MERGED"
  elif [[ "$state" == "closed" && "$merged_at" == "null" ]]; then
    actual="CLOSED"
  fi

  if [[ "$expected" == "$actual" ]]; then
    echo "OK  - ${repo}#${pr}: $actual"
  else
    echo "MISMATCH - ${repo}#${pr}: expected $expected, got $actual" >&2
    fail=1
  fi
done

exit $fail

Length of output: 175176


Add explicit UTC and ensure deterministic ordering

Statuses for all changed entries have been verified and match the expected values.

• Append “UTC” to the timestamp header for clarity
• Enforce a stable sort (e.g. by status, repository, PR number) to minimize daily diff churn

Apply this header tweak:

-# JUnit 5 migration PR candidates found on 2025-08-09 01:39:26
+# JUnit 5 migration PR candidates found on 2025-08-09 01:39:26 UTC
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# JUnit 5 migration PR candidates found on 2025-08-09 01:39:26
# JUnit 5 migration PR candidates found on 2025-08-09 01:39:26 UTC
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In junit5_candidate_prs.txt at line 1, update the timestamp header by appending
"UTC" to clarify the timezone. Additionally, ensure the list of PR candidates is
sorted deterministically by status, repository, and PR number to reduce
unnecessary daily changes. Modify the code generating this header and sorting
logic accordingly to implement these changes.

@gounthar gounthar merged commit a4432ac into main Aug 9, 2025
7 checks passed
@gounthar gounthar deleted the auto-update-pr-data branch August 9, 2025 06:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants