Skip to content

Conversation

@pquentin
Copy link
Member

@pquentin pquentin commented Nov 4, 2025

No description provided.

@pquentin pquentin added the skip-backport This pull request should not be backported label Nov 4, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Following you can find the validation changes against the target branch for the APIs.

API Status Request Response
bulk 🟢 577/577 → 581/581 595/595 → 599/599
cluster.get_component_template 🟢 → 🔴 14/14 → 15/15 14/14 → 14/15
cluster.put_component_template 🔴 30/34 → 30/35 34/34 → 35/35
indices.create 🔴 1430/1458 → 1434/1462 1458/1458 → 1462/1462
indices.get_data_lifecycle 🔴 14/14 → 15/15 1/14 → 1/15
indices.get_index_template 🟢 → 🔴 23/23 → 24/24 23/23 → 23/24
indices.put_data_lifecycle 🟢 → 🔴 6/6 → 6/7 6/6 → 7/7
indices.put_index_template 🔴 136/160 → 136/161 160/160 → 161/161
search 🔴 2641/2659 → 2649/2667 2659/2659 → 2667/2667
security.create_api_key 🟢 68/68 → 72/72 59/59 → 63/63

You can validate these APIs yourself by using the make validate target.

* @availability serverless
*/
filters?: string
filters?: string | string[]
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

* You can update this setting in the `elasticsearch.yml` file or by using the cluster update settings API.
*/
index: IndexName
index: Indices
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

* To target all data streams in a cluster, omit this parameter or use `*`.
*/
name?: IndexName
name?: Indices
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

* You can update this setting in the `elasticsearch.yml` file or by using the cluster update settings API.
*/
index: IndexName
index: Indices
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

* It does not support other wildcard patterns.
*/
application: Name
application: Names
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

* It also accepts wildcards (`*`).
*/
snapshot: Name
snapshot: Names
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

* If the text does not have a header row, columns are named "column1", "column2", "column3", for example.
*/
column_names?: string
column_names?: Names
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

* If the text does not have a header row, columns are named "column1", "column2", "column3", for example.
*/
column_names?: string
column_names?: Names
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be string | string[] instead?

Copy link
Member

@flobernd flobernd Nov 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably yes. The Name/Names is kinda arbitrary, so string will do since Names does not provide a benefit here.

I'll double check later.

* If the text does not have a header role, columns are named "column1", "column2", "column3", for example.
*/
column_names?: string
column_names?: Names
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comments as above, the underlying parsing function is the same.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

skip-backport This pull request should not be backported specification

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants