-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Add vector of tracks to TICL tracksters and candidates and add other validation plots #48862
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add vector of tracks to TICL tracksters and candidates and add other validation plots #48862
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48862/46025
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
- change the dataformats to allow this - change the simulation to link multiple tracks - change the validation to consider all the tracks
dde6849 to
862c400
Compare
|
@cmsbuild please test |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @AuroraPerego for master. It involves the following packages:
@Moanwar, @antoniovagnerini, @ctarricone, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @rseidita, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
@AuroraPerego could you resolve the conflicts before proceeding? From the DQM side, the code looks fine. Failures in the tests are either spurious or caused by DAS errors. |
|
@cmsbuild please test |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48862/46236
|
|
Pull request #48862 was updated. @ctarricone, @gabrielmscampos, @nothingface0, @rseidita can you please check and sign again. |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 44KB to repository The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here:
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+dqm |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
This PR introduces the possibility of having multiple tracks within the same
TICLCandidate, which allows us to save the entire decay chain of tracks left by a particle and its daughters entering HGCAL (instead of the current situation where we serve only the first one).This change has already been applied to the
simTICLCandidates andsimTracksters and considered in the validation, where the track linked to the reconstructed candidate is checked against all the tracks left in the tracker associated with the simulated particle and its daughters.Later, this will be used in the reconstruction as well, making it "many(-tracks)-to-many(-tracksters)",
In addition, I added a few plots to the
TICLCandidatevalidation:The
TICLDumperhas been updated to save the vector of tracks.PR validation:
run wf of single pion with 0PU and 200PU and looked at the validation plots, available here (0 PU) and here (200PU).
test it with wfs 29688.207, 29888.207, 29634.203, 29834.203
FYI @waredjeb @felicepantaleo