Skip to content

Conversation

@rovere
Copy link
Contributor

@rovere rovere commented Apr 16, 2025

PR description:

Previously, SimClusters were saved regardless of whether the associated
CaloParticle passed the selector criteria. This happened because the DFS
traversal and SimCluster population occurred without checking the
selector status of the current CaloParticle. As a result, SimClusters
belonging to rejected CaloParticles were still saved. This fix ensures
that SimClusters are only saved if their corresponding CaloParticle has
passed the selection.

PR validation:

Checked on some runTheMatrix workflows and there are no more orphan SimClusters.

rovere added 3 commits April 16, 2025 14:12
Previously, SimClusters were saved regardless of whether the associated
CaloParticle passed the selector criteria. This happened because the DFS
traversal and SimCluster population occurred without checking the
selector status of the current CaloParticle. As a result, SimClusters
belonging to rejected CaloParticles were still saved. This fix ensures
that SimClusters are only saved if their corresponding CaloParticle has
passed the selection.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 16, 2025

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-47883/44523

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @rovere for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • SimCalorimetry/HGCalAssociatorProducers (upgrade, simulation)
  • SimDataFormats/CaloAnalysis (simulation)
  • SimGeneral/CaloAnalysis (simulation)
  • SimGeneral/Debugging (simulation)
  • SimGeneral/MixingModule (simulation)

@Moanwar, @civanch, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88, @mdhildreth, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ReyerBand, @apsallid, @bsunanda, @denizsun, @fabiocos, @felicepantaleo, @makortel, @martinamalberti, @missirol, @mmusich, @salimcerci, @sameasy, @slomeo, @thomreis, @wang0jin, @youyingli this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@rovere
Copy link
Contributor Author

rovere commented Apr 16, 2025

@AuroraPerego @fabiocos @felicepantaleo @waredjeb

@rovere
Copy link
Contributor Author

rovere commented Apr 16, 2025

type ngt

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the ngt label Apr 16, 2025
@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 44KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-abc825/45578/summary.html
COMMIT: a912731
CMSSW: CMSSW_15_1_X_2025-04-16-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/47883/45578/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Apr 17, 2025

+1

differences in phase2 WFs are expected.

@rovere
Copy link
Contributor Author

rovere commented Apr 21, 2025

@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 ping?

@Moanwar
Copy link
Contributor

Moanwar commented Apr 21, 2025

+Upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit cd48fe0 into cms-sw:master Apr 21, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants