Skip to content

Conversation

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Jan 3, 2024

PR description:

PR #38304 moved TkAlStyle.cc from Alignment/OfflineValidation/macros to a header / source implementation in order to include the header file in other developments.
This has broken few macros in cmssw that contain the incorrect include: this PR fixes the issue, while adding back some lost functionalities originally included in PR #15570 and removed in the meanwhile.
The file Alignment/OfflineValidation/macros/trackSplitPlot.C has apparently not been touched since the central code-format campaign, and thus in order for this PR to pass the standard code quality requirements, it is now heavily changed (albeit basically all of it is just formatting).
I profit of this PR to add a dedicated unit test profiting of the existing file Alignment/OfflineValidation/test/testTkAlStyle.C.

PR validation:

Relies on the compilation and the newly added unit test (scram b runtests_testTkAlStyle runs fine).

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, might be backported to 13.0.X to be used for the 2022+2023 re-reco alignment campaigns.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jan 3, 2024

type bug-fix

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 3, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 3, 2024

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43650/38309

  • This PR adds an extra 64KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 3, 2024

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Alignment/OfflineValidation (alca)

@cmsbuild, @consuegs, @saumyaphor4252, @perrotta can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @adewit, @rsreds, @tocheng, @yuanchao, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jan 3, 2024

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 3, 2024

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1c56b1/36702/summary.html
COMMIT: 5947b05
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-01-03-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/43650/36702/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

Copy link
Contributor

@perrotta perrotta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stilish comments are, of course, unimportant: just apply them if you wish.
Please just check my doubts related to L237 and L2329 of trackSplitPlot.C: if you confirm that it is OK I'll sign for AlCa

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Jan 4, 2024

+alca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 4, 2024

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jan 4, 2024

Stilish comments are, of course, unimportant: just apply them if you wish.

since we're not in a hurry with this, I'll implement the comments on the style of the commented lines as well.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 4, 2024

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43650/38312

  • This PR adds an extra 64KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 4, 2024

Pull request #43650 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @consuegs can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jan 4, 2024

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 4, 2024

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1c56b1/36705/summary.html
COMMIT: e3347b7
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-01-04-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/43650/36705/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Jan 4, 2024

+alca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 4, 2024

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jan 9, 2024

there are further developments on top of this PR that are awaiting this to be merged.
@cms-sw/orp-l2 can you please merge it? thank you.

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants