-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Silence static analyzer warning on existsAs() calls in PluginDescription.h #42889
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42889/37024
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
…ion.h These two uses of existsAs() are legitimate
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42889/37025
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master. It involves the following packages:
@Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar, @makortel, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
@cmsbuild, please test Let's see if this works |
|
@Dr15Jones Do you agree? |
|
yes |
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found 1 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test CondToolsLHCInfoNewPopConTest had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
Seems to do the job. The unit test fails also in the IBs |
|
+core |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-55493a/34960/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
Hi @makortel Thanks very much for the PR. I still see warnings of |
|
I'm honestly puzzled why the warnings appear only in the tests with #42518? |
|
Ready to merge except we also need this one: |
|
@cms-sw/orp-l2 please feel free to merge. I will follow up on remaining static log warning in the original PR. Thx. |
|
+1 |
PR description:
As far as I can (quickly) tell, these two uses of existsAs() are legitimate. The warnings were noticed in #42518 (comment) .
Resolves cms-sw/framework-team#681
PR validation:
None (edited on the web editor).