Revert "decoupling NANO V10 and V11 [WIP]"#39620
Conversation
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39620/32415
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @perrotta (Andrea Perrotta) for master. It involves the following packages:
@perrotta, @rappoccio, @swertz, @vlimant, @cmsbuild, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
please test workflow 11634.15 |
|
that workflow in particular is using a customise function for V10 that the original PR is getting rid of. |
there are now many more workflows that fail beyond 11634.15 , see https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/html/cmssdt-ib/#/relVal/CMSSW_12_6/2022-10-04-2300?selectedArchs=el8_amd64_gcc10&selectedFlavors=X&selectedStatus=failed I tested that one simply to verify esplicitely that reverting the PR its error does disappear |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dc8a93/28007/summary.html Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
|
Closing this PR because it is not needed any more, given that the fix #39621 worked as intended |
Reverts #39337
See #39337 (comment)