-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Revert "decoupling NANO V10 and V11 [WIP]" #39620
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39620/32415
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @perrotta (Andrea Perrotta) for master. It involves the following packages:
@perrotta, @rappoccio, @swertz, @vlimant, @cmsbuild, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
please test workflow 11634.15 |
|
that workflow in particular is using a customise function for V10 that the original PR is getting rid of. |
there are now many more workflows that fail beyond 11634.15 , see https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/html/cmssdt-ib/#/relVal/CMSSW_12_6/2022-10-04-2300?selectedArchs=el8_amd64_gcc10&selectedFlavors=X&selectedStatus=failed I tested that one simply to verify esplicitely that reverting the PR its error does disappear |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dc8a93/28007/summary.html Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
|
Closing this PR because it is not needed any more, given that the fix #39621 worked as intended |
Reverts #39337
See #39337 (comment)