Skip to content

Conversation

@malbouis
Copy link
Contributor

@malbouis malbouis commented Jun 8, 2022

PR description:

This PR is to include the new L1T Menu in the mcRun3 and data GTs, as requested here: https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/run-3-gt-update-of-the-l1-menu-tag-v1-1-0-in-run-3-mc-gts-and-run-3-data-relvals-gts/11279 and needed in PR #38241.

We also profit from this change to include the EGM regression tags in the offline data GTs, as requested here: https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/offline-gt-updating-egm-regression-tags-for-run-3-collisions-for-offline-tags/11203

Finally, we include also the run3_hlt GT introduced in PR #38265.

This PR is to be merged together with PR #38241.

The GT diffs are listed below:
run3_hlt
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//123X_dataRun3_HLT_frozen_v6/123X_dataRun3_HLT_frozen_v5

run3_hlt_relval
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_dataRun3_HLT_relval_v1/123X_dataRun3_HLT_relval_v9

run3_data
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_dataRun3_v2/124X_dataRun3_v1

run3_data_relval
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_dataRun3_relval_v2/124X_dataRun3_relval_v1

phase1_2022_design
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun3_2022_design_v4/124X_mcRun3_2022_design_v3

phase1_2022_realistic
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_v4/124X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_v3

phase1_2022_cosmics
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun3_2022cosmics_realistic_deco_v5/124X_mcRun3_2022cosmics_realistic_deco_v4

phase1_2022_cosmics_design
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun3_2022cosmics_design_deco_v4/124X_mcRun3_2022cosmics_design_deco_v3

phase1_2022_realistic_hi
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_HI_v4/124X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_HI_v3

phase1_2023_realistic
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v4/124X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v3

phase1_2024_realistic
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v4/124X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v3

phase2_realistic
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//124X_mcRun4_realistic_v5/124X_mcRun4_realistic_v4

PR validation:

runTheMatrix.py -l 136.897, 12034.0, 7.23, 12834.0

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

It is not a backport but it will be backported to 124X (as soon as PR #38265 is merged) and to 123X (for the inclusion of the EGM tags only, in run3_data_relval and run3_data).

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38283/30434

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @malbouis for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/AlCa (alca)

@cmsbuild, @malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @mmusich, @fabiocos, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@malbouis
Copy link
Contributor Author

malbouis commented Jun 8, 2022

test parameters:

@malbouis
Copy link
Contributor Author

malbouis commented Jun 8, 2022

please test

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor

missirol commented Jun 8, 2022

@malbouis , thanks for the quick update of the GTs with the new L1T menu.

The new run3_hlt and run3_hlt_relval GTs have IOV differences:
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts//123X_dataRun3_HLT_frozen_v6/124X_dataRun3_HLT_relval_v1

I note it in case you can (and/or want to) change this (I think HLT tests will pass even with the GTs as they are right now).

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2022

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e5bd3e/25350/summary.html
COMMIT: 0405d95
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-06-07-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38283/25350/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-e5bd3e/12034.0_TTbar_14TeV+2021Design+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSim+Digi+RecoNano+HARVESTNano
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-e5bd3e/136.897_RunCosmics2021CRUZET+RunCosmics2021CRUZET+RECOCOSDRUN3+ALCACOSDRUN3+HARVESTDCR3
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-e5bd3e/7.23_Cosmics_UP21+Cosmics_UP21+DIGICOS_UP21+RECOCOS_UP21+ALCACOS_UP21+HARVESTCOS_UP21

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 54
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4046231
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 309
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 130
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4045770
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 5747.095999999999 KiB( 53 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 438.834 KiB HLT/JME
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 215.022 KiB HLT/TAU
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 111.191 KiB HLT/HLTEgammaValidation
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): -54.365 KiB HLT/HIG
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 22.390 KiB HLT/EGM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): -13.316 KiB HLT/Exotica
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): -6.582 KiB HLT/Higgs
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 5.213 KiB HLT/Filters
  • Checked 226 log files, 45 edm output root files, 54 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 8 / 53 workflows

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 8, 2022

@cmsbuild , please test

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 8, 2022

---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS

@qliphy is this a known issue? Is there a github issue to follow? It's definitely not coming from this PR

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Jun 8, 2022

@tvami probably a glitch, see e.g.
#38147
hopefully a new test will succeed

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor

missirol commented Jun 8, 2022

@tvami @malbouis , can we please test this PR without #38241 (see this #38283 (comment))?

In #38241, we are already testing the 2 of them together, and here it would be useful to see the differences induced by this PR alone (to disentangle them from the diffs we get when testing #38241+thisPR).

@malbouis
Copy link
Contributor Author

malbouis commented Jun 8, 2022

@tvami @malbouis , can we please test this PR without #38241 (see this #38283 (comment))?

@missirol I think we can, but when I tried it locally yesterday, the relval wfs were failing without PR #38241 .

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 8, 2022

test parameters:
*

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2022

Pull request #38283 was updated. @malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 8, 2022

type egamma

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the egamma label Jun 8, 2022
@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 8, 2022

type l1t

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 8, 2022

@smuzaffar I tried to do type l1t but that doesnt seem to exists. We frequently have updates from the L1T team, so I think it would be nice to have that label

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e5bd3e/25369/summary.html
COMMIT: 1f257cb
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-06-08-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38283/25369/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-e5bd3e/12034.0_TTbar_14TeV+2021Design+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSim+Digi+RecoNano+HARVESTNano
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-e5bd3e/136.897_RunCosmics2021CRUZET+RunCosmics2021CRUZET+RECOCOSDRUN3+ALCACOSDRUN3+HARVESTDCR3
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-e5bd3e/7.23_Cosmics_UP21+Cosmics_UP21+DIGICOS_UP21+RECOCOS_UP21+ALCACOS_UP21+HARVESTCOS_UP21

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 54
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4049895
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4049859
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 53 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 226 log files, 45 edm output root files, 54 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 8, 2022

+alca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2022

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@tvami , ok l1t type/label is available now

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the l1t label Jun 9, 2022
@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Jun 9, 2022

@smuzaffar I tried to do type l1t but that doesnt seem to exists. We frequently have updates from the L1T team, so I think it would be nice to have that label

@tvami , I see that @smuzaffar has created the corresponding tag.
However, why not simply "assign" it to L1T, if you want a PR to be reviewed by them?

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

@smuzaffar I tried to do type l1t but that doesnt seem to exists. We frequently have updates from the L1T team, so I think it would be nice to have that label

@tvami , I see that @smuzaffar has created the corresponding tag. However, why not simply "assign" it to L1T, if you want a PR to be reviewed by them?

@perrotta I guess the point here is about the "label" goal: AFAIU its purpose is not to request a signature, just to flag the type of the PR for a better bookkeeping.
And this PR is exactly the case: i.e. the only modfied file is autoCond which is alca domain, but the changes come from L1T tag updates.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 9, 2022

Exactly as Francesco said

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 9, 2022

type l1t

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 9, 2022

@cms-sw/orp-l2 shall we merge this and #38241 asap so they have some time in the IBs before their backport is merged?

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Jun 9, 2022

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants