-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Include new geometry tags in Run-3 MC GTs #35277
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35277/25274
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master. It involves the following packages:
@yuanchao, @malbouis, @cmsbuild, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
@cmsbuild , please test |
|
Tests passed, but, as always when changing the geometry, there are several differences in the comparisons. |
|
@cmsbuild , please test
|
|
This PR changes the DDD geometry. There is no way to preserve regression in this case. The 2021 DDD workflows that re-generate MC (312.0, 11634.0, and 12434.0) will show comparison differences, but these differences look like statistical fluctuations. |
|
At Tuesday's Simulation meeting, it was decided that the DDD geometry will require one more technical revision. That means there will be one more DB upload, and a new GT version will be needed. |
Hi @cvuosalo I agree with this plan and then we can consider that other payload as a bugfix maybe |
|
+alca |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
Ok so the new Jenkins results are similar, based on the above, we are ready for it to get merged |
|
@tvami No problem. We are now building 12_1_0_pre3 and will start adding new PRs after the build is finished. |
|
+1 |
PR description:
Inclusion of new DDD geometry tags in Run-3 MC GTs. Requested in
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/calibrations/4460.html
This is meant for
CMSSW_12_1_0_pre4so should not merge beforeCMSSW_12_1_0_pre3is cut (expected to be today, Sept 14)Differences in the GTs:
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/121X_mcRun3_2021_design_v1/121X_mcRun3_2021_design_v2
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/121X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v2/121X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v3
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/121X_mcRun3_2021cosmics_realistic_deco_v2/121X_mcRun3_2021cosmics_realistic_deco_v3
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/121X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_HI_v2/121X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_HI_v3
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/121X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v1/121X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v2
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/121X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v1/121X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v2
Differences are in the requested 2 geometry tags:
XMLFILE_Geometry_120YV2_Extended2021_mcandTKRECO_Geometry_120YV2These revisions are included:
PR validation:
Geometry validation talk in the Simulation meeting: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1071938/#56-progress-report-on-dd4hep-m
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
This is not a backport but a backport to 12_0_X is expected
cc @cvuosalo @srimanob