Skip to content

Conversation

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

@tvami tvami commented Sep 14, 2021

PR description:

Inclusion of new DDD geometry tags in Run-3 MC GTs. Requested in
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/calibrations/4460.html

This is meant for CMSSW_12_1_0_pre4 so should not merge before CMSSW_12_1_0_pre3 is cut (expected to be today, Sept 14)

Differences in the GTs:

Differences are in the requested 2 geometry tags:
XMLFILE_Geometry_120YV2_Extended2021_mc and TKRECO_Geometry_120YV2

These revisions are included:

  • PPS Run 3 sim and reco geometry was implemented.
  • PPS material names were made unique.
  • Duplicate material names were eliminated.
  • In the extended geometry description, numerical drift of rotation and translation values was reduced by rounding values <=|1e-11| to zero to match their original definitions.
  • In the Tracker Reco geometry record, calculated values of translations <=|1.e-10| were rounded to zero. Also, the third position of the so-called "navType" (_nt2) was updated from 4 to 6. This change occurred in XML during 11_2 development, but it never made it to the DB until now.

PR validation:

Geometry validation talk in the Simulation meeting: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1071938/#56-progress-report-on-dd4hep-m

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

This is not a backport but a backport to 12_0_X is expected

cc @cvuosalo @srimanob

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35277/25274

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/AlCa (alca)

@yuanchao, @malbouis, @cmsbuild, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @mmusich, @fabiocos, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Sep 14, 2021

@cmsbuild , please test

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Sep 14, 2021

As written in the description: "This is meant for CMSSW_12_1_0_pre4 so should not merge before CMSSW_12_1_0_pre3 is cut (expected to be today, Sept 14)"
@perrotta @qliphy can you confirm that this schedule is still valid?

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Sep 15, 2021

As written in the description: "This is meant for CMSSW_12_1_0_pre4 so should not merge before CMSSW_12_1_0_pre3 is cut (expected to be today, Sept 14)"
@perrotta @qliphy can you confirm that this schedule is still valid?

Yes, pre3 is to be built quite soon.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d96316/18612/summary.html
COMMIT: 5bb86ed
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-14-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35277/18612/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d96316/18612/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d96316/18612/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 7480 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3000833
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 83370
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2917441
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 3 / 38 workflows

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

Tests passed, but, as always when changing the geometry, there are several differences in the comparisons.
@cms-sw/geometry-l2 please could you confirm these differences are expected?

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Sep 15, 2021

@cmsbuild , please test

  • many other commits were included in the other test, maybe this time it will be cleaner?

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

This PR changes the DDD geometry. There is no way to preserve regression in this case. The 2021 DDD workflows that re-generate MC (312.0, 11634.0, and 12434.0) will show comparison differences, but these differences look like statistical fluctuations.

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

At Tuesday's Simulation meeting, it was decided that the DDD geometry will require one more technical revision. That means there will be one more DB upload, and a new GT version will be needed.
I think it is OK to go ahead with this PR. The GT in this PR contains the major PPS changes. Then the next GT will contain only very minor technical geometry changes.
@tvami Do you agree with this plan? The alternative is to stop this PR, wait for the new DDD revision, and create a new GT that contains all the changes together.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Sep 15, 2021

At Tuesday's Simulation meeting, it was decided that the DDD geometry will require one more technical revision. That means there will be one more DB upload, and a new GT version will be needed.
I think it is OK to go ahead with this PR. The GT in this PR contains the major PPS changes. Then the next GT will contain only very minor technical geometry changes.
@tvami Do you agree with this plan? The alternative is to stop this PR, wait for the new DDD revision, and create a new GT that contains all the changes together.

Hi @cvuosalo I agree with this plan and then we can consider that other payload as a bugfix maybe

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

+alca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d96316/18631/summary.html
COMMIT: 5bb86ed
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-14-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35277/18631/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d96316/18631/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d96316/18631/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 7478 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3000833
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 83364
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2917447
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 3 / 38 workflows

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Sep 15, 2021

This PR changes the DDD geometry. There is no way to preserve regression in this case. The 2021 DDD workflows that re-generate MC (312.0, 11634.0, and 12434.0) will show comparison differences, but these differences look like statistical fluctuations.

Ok so the new Jenkins results are similar, based on the above, we are ready for it to get merged

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Sep 16, 2021

Hi @perrotta @qliphy sorry for urging you so often, we get a lot of requests for GTs now... Please see
#35295

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Sep 16, 2021

@tvami No problem. We are now building 12_1_0_pre3 and will start adding new PRs after the build is finished.

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Sep 16, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit ba8af8e into cms-sw:master Sep 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants