-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Better Camera Implementation #59
Conversation
Added camera scanner
Added camera ID alongside Serial #
The code is now done, and completely untested. I need teh Orin cameras to be able to test it, and also to test it on the Orin. However, this code should be perfectly just fine and working. The Bash scripts are the only thing entirely untested and possibly not working correctly.
…into cameraIDs
I forgot these on the first time I pushed the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't have enough experience with this side of the service, so defer to Chris or others on the review. Two minor comments to make usability a bit better, and in general for people.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Above comments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At the sunday meeting we decided we need to prioritize integrating with the kalman filter this week. So we're going to descope and read the rotation/translation for each camera from each calibration file, and I'm asking you to add those parameters into those files. We can pick up the implementation later after we've successfully integrated.
Please make the requested changes to the calibration files as soon as possible so we can merge it. This is the highest priority activity on the vision team.
…into cameraIDs
This should be ok? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks great, thanks so much for pushing this over the finish line to meet our integration milestone!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving per conversation w Chris
This seems to be ok, but strangely both subprocesses appear to be dying for some reason.