Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data Localization #4466

Open
wants to merge 68 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Data Localization #4466

wants to merge 68 commits into from

Conversation

hishamco
Copy link
Member

@hishamco hishamco commented Oct 3, 2019

Fixes #3607

@hishamco hishamco requested a review from sebastienros October 3, 2019 07:27
@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

hishamco commented Oct 4, 2019

I'm successfully able to export the dynamic data localization, here's what I got:

{
  "name": "",
  "displayName": "",
  "description": "",
  "author": "",
  "website": "",
  "version": "",
  "issetuprecipe": false,
  "categories": "",
  "tags": [],
  "steps": [
    {
      "name": "DynamicDataTranslations",
      "DynamicDataTranslations": {
        "Article1": {
          "en": "Article1",
          "fr": "Article1",
          "es": "Artículo1"
        },
        "Article2": {
          "en": "Article2",
          "fr": "Article2",
          "es": ""
        },
        "Article3": {
          "en": "",
          "fr": "",
          "es": "Artículo3"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

It's the time to tweak it little to add the group them by the context

@hishamco hishamco force-pushed the hishamco/data-localization branch from c526e83 to b39500a Compare October 5, 2019 18:58
@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

@sebastienros any comments here before I will move further

/cc @jtkech @jptissot @Skrypt

@jrestall
Copy link
Contributor

@sebastienros any comments or should @hishamco keep going? Would love to see this one keep moving but it's dropped to the second page of PRs 😟

@sebastienros
Copy link
Member

I had started to review ... will go on don't worry, very important

@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

hishamco commented Nov 6, 2019

@sebastienros you asked me from the beginning to keep you in the loop, seem I enter in infinite loop 😄

@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

@sebastienros any change to review this before 1.0.0 or shall we delay to 1.1.0?

@agriffard
Copy link
Member

Conflicts to resolve.

@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

hishamco commented Oct 5, 2020

Sure, I will resolve them, but still need more work here, IMHO if this feature will be after 1.0.0 I can try to finalize it and ship it in Orchard Core Contrib at least we have a preview there, unless @sebastienros has another suggestion about when this feature should be shipped. Furthermore I think DataAnnotations Localization could go in 1.0.0 to avoid any breaking changes later

Thanks

@hishamco hishamco force-pushed the hishamco/data-localization branch from 5090dd4 to c84f2b4 Compare October 5, 2020 14:23
@Skrypt
Copy link
Contributor

Skrypt commented Dec 15, 2020

@hishamco This PR looks like a good start but where is the UI/Views/Controllers for adding translations on a Content Type or Field names? Ok, getting back on this tomorrow. Will test it and try to add some UI.

@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

I just waiting for Seb at that time ;) I can implement this feature in OCC and provide a worked prototype

@Skrypt
Copy link
Contributor

Skrypt commented Dec 15, 2020

It definitely needs to be added to OC.

@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

It definitely needs to be added to OC.

Me too ;) what I'm suggested is to make real working prototype in OCC, after that we can continue here and hear the OC team opinions

BTW this supposed to be 1.1.0 feature If I remembered

@Skrypt
Copy link
Contributor

Skrypt commented Dec 15, 2020

I think everyone will agree that we should not wait on 1.0 to start working on something 😅
I don't know about OC Contrib. I think this should be part of OC right out of the box.

@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

I don't know about OC Contrib. I think this should be part of OC right out of the box.

OCC is provide non official modules, themes and features for OC, of course this will be a part of OC but it needs a time to review and merge, I will try to keep this updated until Seb have a time to revise this

@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

hishamco commented Apr 7, 2024

It's ready for review, also I need to update something before merging. FYI while the PR is too old and very useful we can merge it with minimalist features, then I can continue pushing new features

I already did a great progress in OCC, also I might need to do another demo perhaps to accelerate the merging process :)

@Piedone
Copy link
Member

Piedone commented Apr 7, 2024

Awesome! @sebastienros would you like to continue the review?

@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

hishamco commented Apr 8, 2024

This is for you Seb #4466 (comment) :)

@Mollenhorst
Copy link

It's ready for review, also I need to update something before merging. FYI while the PR is too old and very useful we can merge it with minimalist features, then I can continue pushing new features

I already did a great progress in OCC, also I might need to do another demo perhaps to accelerate the merging process :)

It's ready for review, also I need to update something before merging. FYI while the PR is too old and very useful we can merge it with minimalist features, then I can continue pushing new features

I already did a great progress in OCC, also I might need to do another demo perhaps to accelerate the merging process :)

If you are planning a short demo on this, consider joining me into this call.

@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

@Mollenhorst sure I will do that, but my demo is follow-up, if you need related demos I can share the links, also I demo the Data Localization on the previous Orchard Harvest Conf

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has merge conflicts. Please resolve those before requesting a review.

Copy link
Contributor

It seems that this pull request didn't really move for quite a while. Is this something you'd like to revisit any time soon or should we close? Please comment if you'd like to pick it up.

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has merge conflicts. Please resolve those before requesting a review.

@MikeAlhayek
Copy link
Member

for instructions on how to resolve the merge conflicts due to #16572 please follow the step listed in this comment.

@hishamco hishamco mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2024
10 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

It seems that this pull request didn't really move for quite a while. Is this something you'd like to revisit any time soon or should we close? Please comment if you'd like to pick it up.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Oct 28, 2024
@hishamco hishamco removed the stale label Oct 29, 2024
@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

I think this should be a part of OC 3.0.0

@Piedone
Copy link
Member

Piedone commented Oct 29, 2024

Does it have/need breaking changes?

@hishamco
Copy link
Member Author

Does it have/need breaking changes?

I don't think so, but I need to revise the PR and see the updates that I did in OCC

Copy link
Contributor

It seems that this pull request didn't really move for quite a while. Is this something you'd like to revisit any time soon or should we close? Please comment if you'd like to pick it up.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Dec 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Dec 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Translate a dynamic content