Skip to content

Conversation

@lgoettgens
Copy link
Member

This (together with Nemocas/AbstractAlgebra.jl#2242) fixes building the Nemo docs, at least it does so locally for me.

```@docs
is_square(::ZZRingElem)
```@docs; canonical=false
is_square(::NCRingElement)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am OK with merging this as a "quick fix" but I wonder if we should not instead do it similar to how we did it in AA, and just have a list here:

The following standard ring methods are implemented for `ZZRingElem`:
- [`is_square`](@ref)
- ...

possibly followed by an example?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that this is not optimal right now, but I just wanted to do a mechanical change as a bandaid

@lgoettgens lgoettgens closed this Dec 11, 2025
@lgoettgens lgoettgens reopened this Dec 11, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.22%. Comparing base (ddb0880) to head (560fd90).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2197      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.24%   88.22%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          99       99              
  Lines       37056    37056              
==========================================
- Hits        32701    32691      -10     
- Misses       4355     4365      +10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@lgoettgens lgoettgens merged commit f49fce0 into Nemocas:master Dec 11, 2025
27 of 38 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants