Skip to content

Update Content Type description and scope note#90

Open
palemieux wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
palemieux-patch-1
Open

Update Content Type description and scope note#90
palemieux wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
palemieux-patch-1

Conversation

@palemieux
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes #89

Clarified the Content Type description and added a note about the scope attribute for ContentKind.
<CompositionPlaylist>

[^1]: *If the scope attribute is absent, the permissible SMPTE 429-7 ContentKind values are as follows: “feature”, “trailer”, “teaser”, “test”, “rating”, “advertisement”, “short”, “transitional”, “psa”, and “policy”. If the scope attribute is present and set to `http://www.smptera.org/schemas/429-16/2014/CPL-Metadata#scope/content-kind`, the permissible SMPTE ST 429-16 ContentKind values are as follows: “clip”, “promo” and “stereocard.” See the specification for details.* No newline at end of file
+_NOTE_: As specified at SMPTE ST 429-7, 6.8, the `scope` attribute of the `ContentKind` element is present and set to the value specified in the _ContentKind Scope_ column of the register, _unless_ the _ContentKind Scope_ is equal to `http://www.smpte-ra.org/schemas/429-7/2006/CPL`, in which case the `scope` attribute can be omitted.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
+_NOTE_: As specified at SMPTE ST 429-7, 6.8, the `scope` attribute of the `ContentKind` element is present and set to the value specified in the _ContentKind Scope_ column of the register, _unless_ the _ContentKind Scope_ is equal to `http://www.smpte-ra.org/schemas/429-7/2006/CPL`, in which case the `scope` attribute can be omitted.
_NOTE_: As specified at SMPTE ST 429-7, 6.8, the `scope` attribute of the `ContentKind` element is present and set to the value specified in the _ContentKind Scope_ column of the register, _unless_ the _ContentKind Scope_ is equal to `http://www.smpte-ra.org/schemas/429-7/2006/CPL`, in which case the `scope` attribute can be omitted.
_NOTE 2_: The scope `http://www.smpte-ra.org/schemas/2067-3/2013#content-kind` and its defined ContentKinds should be used with caution, as support for these Content Types are limited in DC equipment, and may cause issues and/or confusion in theatrical environments.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This address Adam's other point, and something that hadn't been addressed. We have to advise not to use the IMF based ContentKinds, as sorting in both TMS and servers don't have wide support for these values, and often get dropped to "unknown" or not listed at all.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have to advise not to use the IMF based ContentKinds, as sorting in both TMS and servers don't have wide support for these values, and often get dropped to "unknown" or not listed at all.

Let's remove them from the register then.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are still usable as CTT fields.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If they are usable in CTT, then the bug is with the TMS and servers and no note is necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

IMF-specific content types listed on DCP content type registry without scope clarification

2 participants