Update Content Type description and scope note#90
Conversation
Clarified the Content Type description and added a note about the scope attribute for ContentKind.
| <CompositionPlaylist> | ||
|
|
||
| [^1]: *If the scope attribute is absent, the permissible SMPTE 429-7 ContentKind values are as follows: “feature”, “trailer”, “teaser”, “test”, “rating”, “advertisement”, “short”, “transitional”, “psa”, and “policy”. If the scope attribute is present and set to `http://www.smpte–ra.org/schemas/429-16/2014/CPL-Metadata#scope/content-kind`, the permissible SMPTE ST 429-16 ContentKind values are as follows: “clip”, “promo” and “stereocard.” See the specification for details.* No newline at end of file | ||
| +_NOTE_: As specified at SMPTE ST 429-7, 6.8, the `scope` attribute of the `ContentKind` element is present and set to the value specified in the _ContentKind Scope_ column of the register, _unless_ the _ContentKind Scope_ is equal to `http://www.smpte-ra.org/schemas/429-7/2006/CPL`, in which case the `scope` attribute can be omitted. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| +_NOTE_: As specified at SMPTE ST 429-7, 6.8, the `scope` attribute of the `ContentKind` element is present and set to the value specified in the _ContentKind Scope_ column of the register, _unless_ the _ContentKind Scope_ is equal to `http://www.smpte-ra.org/schemas/429-7/2006/CPL`, in which case the `scope` attribute can be omitted. | |
| _NOTE_: As specified at SMPTE ST 429-7, 6.8, the `scope` attribute of the `ContentKind` element is present and set to the value specified in the _ContentKind Scope_ column of the register, _unless_ the _ContentKind Scope_ is equal to `http://www.smpte-ra.org/schemas/429-7/2006/CPL`, in which case the `scope` attribute can be omitted. | |
| _NOTE 2_: The scope `http://www.smpte-ra.org/schemas/2067-3/2013#content-kind` and its defined ContentKinds should be used with caution, as support for these Content Types are limited in DC equipment, and may cause issues and/or confusion in theatrical environments. | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This address Adam's other point, and something that hadn't been addressed. We have to advise not to use the IMF based ContentKinds, as sorting in both TMS and servers don't have wide support for these values, and often get dropped to "unknown" or not listed at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We have to advise not to use the IMF based ContentKinds, as sorting in both TMS and servers don't have wide support for these values, and often get dropped to "unknown" or not listed at all.
Let's remove them from the register then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
They are still usable as CTT fields.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If they are usable in CTT, then the bug is with the TMS and servers and no note is necessary.
Closes #89