Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fortitude v0.7 #310

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 6, 2025
Merged

Fortitude v0.7 #310

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 6, 2025

Conversation

jatkinson1000
Copy link
Member

This PR updates to use the latest version of the Fortran fortitude linter which included a few API changes

Notably it adds:

  • Ignoring of C003 'implicit none' missing 'external' as this is a f2013 feature and we want to support back to f2008.
  • Adding an explicit public statement to the ftorch and test utils modules.
    • This is correct for the test utils, but I think we should have a discussion about whether everything in the ftorch module should be public.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jwallwork23 jwallwork23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

* Ignoring of `C003` 'implicit none' missing 'external' as this is a f2013 feature and we want to support back to f2008.

That's fine.

* Adding an explicit `public` statement to the ftorch and test utils modules.
  
  * This is correct for the test utils, but I think we should have a discussion about whether everything in the ftorch module should be public.

I agree this is the right thing to do for now to maintain the current API. But yes, we should discuss whether some of the procedures should be made private in a future meeting.

@jatkinson1000
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @jwallwork23 opened #311 to capture this for a future discussion and will merge this now.

@jatkinson1000 jatkinson1000 merged commit 89c42ff into main Mar 6, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@jatkinson1000 jatkinson1000 deleted the fortitude-0.7-bump branch March 6, 2025 09:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants