feat(uci): integrate effect-bound verification chain - #276
feat(uci): integrate effect-bound verification chain#276Tarik Skalić (tarikskalic33) wants to merge 11 commits into
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Preview URL | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ Deployment successful! View logs |
aegisomega | bda5c53 | Commit Preview URL Branch Preview URL |
Aug 20 2026, 02:49 PM |
|
Deployment failed for project hook-generator with the following error: Learn More: https://vercel.com/tariks-projects-e9198507?upgradeToPro=build-rate-limit |
|
Deployment failed for project platform-picker with the following error: Learn More: https://vercel.com/tariks-projects-e9198507?upgradeToPro=build-rate-limit |
|
Deployment failed for project hub with the following error: Learn More: https://vercel.com/tariks-projects-e9198507?upgradeToPro=build-rate-limit |
|
ⓘ Qodo reviews are paused because the subscription is no longer active. Ask your workspace admin to reactivate the subscription to resume reviews. Manage billing |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
UCI-4 — Effect-Bound Verification Chain Integration
Status: INDEPENDENTLY REVIEWED / SECURITY-HARDENED / EXACT-HEAD VERIFIED / READY FOR REVIEW
Exact lineage
This PR reconciles the frozen transition/effect-verification proofline onto the current UCI integration spine. It does not import AtomicAdmission, collective-memory admission, production admission, or the historical stacked branch DAG wholesale.
Preserved epistemic chain
Hard boundaries remain:
DecisionReceipt != ExecutionReceipt != EffectReceiptnominally and after serialization;PERMITcarries decision authority;DEFER -> WAITING;DEFER -/-> EXECUTE;ExecutionReceipt -/-> EffectReceipt;EffectReceiptproducer exists;CompleteVerificationResult=TRUEis verifier output only and does not create or imply admission;Independent review findings and TDD closure
Review found that the original 79-test GREEN did not close three effect-evidence integrity gaps and three CI/evidence-contract gaps:
EffectWitnesswas publicly constructible and structural adapter identity/version checks could accept a caller-fabricated witness as verified effect evidence;resolve -> opensequence susceptible to open-time path/symlink redirection;All six regression falsifiers were committed before the production hardening patch.
Security RED — ESTABLISHED
The six failures were exactly the preregistered fabricated-witness, open-time redirect, missing size-bound, frozen-parent, trigger-scope, and cardinality failures. No pre-existing semantic test regressed in the RED candidate.
Hardened implementation
The reference filesystem observer now:
dir_fd+O_NOFOLLOWon supported POSIX;read();EffectWitnessobjects produced by the adapter, and the verifier rejects structurally fabricated/reconstructed witnesses asV_effect_evidence=FALSE.The native gate now binds literal frozen parent
ebec2f9…, verifies the actual PR base against it, runs only for PRs targeting the UCI-1 parent branch, and locks the hardened proofline to85 passed.Final repo-native exact-head witness — ESTABLISHED
UCI-4 Effect Chain Contractrun32382334592, job96468341013checked out exact:Other native exact-head gates on
bda5c536…:32382334592— SUCCESS32382334558— SUCCESS32382334359— SUCCESS32382334393— SUCCESSSKIPPED; not counted as pass/failure evidenceNo result is promoted from an earlier SHA.
Review decision and explicit residual boundaries
The identified UCI-4 proof-integrity blockers are closed for the declared local/reference effect-observation scope. This is not promoted into stronger production claims.
The process-local issuance registry is a nominal reference provenance boundary, not a cryptographic attestation mechanism. Descriptor-relative
O_NOFOLLOWcontainment is a POSIX reference hardening; unsupported platforms fail closed rather than silently weakening the invariant. Metadata-before/after checking detects ordinary concurrent mutation but is not represented as an atomic filesystem snapshot proof against a privileged adversary.Parent #275 is already READY FOR REVIEW. UCI-5 remains a separate successor and must be restacked/reverified against this new exact UCI-4 head before any downstream status can be promoted.
No mutation of
main, #275, #264, #268, #270, #272, or #273 occurred.