Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xterm test cases #161

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jul 12, 2016
Merged

xterm test cases #161

merged 12 commits into from
Jul 12, 2016

Conversation

jerch
Copy link
Member

@jerch jerch commented Jul 5, 2016

Adding xterm conformance tests. See #156.

I fixed most of the test case input files (up to test 44), any higher test needs to be checked before using. I also switched off all failing test cases for now.

If you are going to apply the test cases please also give the original author of the input files the appropriate credits (https://github.com/MarkLodato).

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
from glob import glob
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this file used at all?

Copy link
Member Author

@jerch jerch Jul 6, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah well with this file I created the expected xterm outputs. It sits there just in case some test case is faulty or needs some adjustments and a rebuild of xterm output. Since it is in Python it can be deleted (you can also get the xterm output with shell tools).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's remove this file then, since it is not being used directly by this repository, in order to keep the codebase lean 😊 .

@parisk
Copy link
Contributor

parisk commented Jul 6, 2016

Hi @jerch thanks a lot for this contribution! I made some comments at first, after resolving I will dig deeper into this.

@parisk
Copy link
Contributor

parisk commented Jul 11, 2016

@jerch thanks a lot for the last patch! Could you please also rebase with master and resolve conflicts? Then we can merge this.

@parisk parisk mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2016
@parisk parisk merged commit 5b44e36 into xtermjs:master Jul 12, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants