Skip to content

Conversation

@SkArchon
Copy link
Contributor

@SkArchon SkArchon commented Dec 15, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Clarified CI workflow step label to indicate test result upload.
    • Updated code coverage configuration to use directory-style path matching, refined composition carryforward behavior, and added comment-related settings controlling layout and carryforward requirements.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Checklist

  • I have discussed my proposed changes in an issue and have received approval to proceed.
  • I have followed the coding standards of the project.
  • Tests or benchmarks have been added or updated.
  • Documentation has been updated on https://github.com/wundergraph/cosmo-docs.
  • I have read the Contributors Guide.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 15, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated a GitHub Actions workflow step label and revised the repository Codecov config: standardized flag paths to directory-style entries with trailing slashes, adjusted composition carryforward, and added comment-related configuration keys (layout/behavior/requirements).

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI workflow
\.github/workflows/protographic.yaml
Renamed the Codecov upload step label from "Upload integration results to Codecov" to "Upload test results to Codecov". No changes to action usage, inputs, or step ordering.
Codecov configuration
codecov.yaml
Standardized flag paths to directory-style entries with trailing slashes (e.g., router/, cli/, studio/, graphqlmetrics/, controlplane/, composition/), enabled carryforward for composition, and added comment settings including layout/behavior/requirement keys (require_changes, require_base, require_head, show_carryforward_flags).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Review focus: validate codecov.yaml keys and trailing-slash path semantics align with Codecov schema and intended directory globs; confirm workflow label change is purely cosmetic.

Possibly related PRs

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main fix: updating Codecov carryforward paths to be detected correctly, which aligns with the primary change of updating codecov.yaml flag paths.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5bed12a and c13e740.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • codecov.yaml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • codecov.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@SkArchon SkArchon marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2025 10:49
@SkArchon SkArchon requested review from a team as code owners December 15, 2025 10:49
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 923cd4f and 4073b64.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/protographic.yaml (1 hunks)
  • codecov.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
codecov.yaml

[error] 46-46: syntax error: found unexpected end of stream

(syntax)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/protographic.yaml (1)

44-51: Step label clarification looks good.

The label change from "Upload integration results to Codecov" to "Upload test results to Codecov" better reflects the actual content being uploaded. Action parameters and inputs remain unchanged.

codecov.yaml (1)

17-17: Standardized flag paths with trailing slashes for carryforward detection.

The addition of trailing slashes (router/, cli/, studio/, etc.) standardizes the path format for directory-style matching, which should improve Codecov's ability to detect and match paths during carryforward. This aligns with the PR objective.

Please verify that these standardized paths are correctly recognized by Codecov's carryforward feature in your test environment.

Also applies to: 21-21, 25-25, 29-29, 33-33, 37-37

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.55%. Comparing base (e5d9750) to head (c13e740).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2412       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   62.31%   90.55%   +28.23%     
===========================================
  Files         295       16      -279     
  Lines       41134     3271    -37863     
  Branches     4194      871     -3323     
===========================================
- Hits        25634     2962    -22672     
+ Misses      15480      309    -15171     
+ Partials       20        0       -20     

see 311 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants