-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
enhance: form builder blank form, form field icons #1506
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
enhance: form builder blank form, form field icons #1506
Conversation
…or_form_builder_ui_redesign
commit daae343 Author: Sapayth Hossain <[email protected]> Date: Fri Oct 25 10:21:05 2024 +0600 fix logo, minor css commit 7590512 Author: Sapayth Hossain <[email protected]> Date: Thu Oct 17 13:00:12 2024 +0600 pro icon and link commit b720564 Author: Sapayth Hossain <[email protected]> Date: Wed Oct 16 17:31:46 2024 +0600 action buttons commit 743860f Author: Sapayth Hossain <[email protected]> Date: Wed Oct 16 13:10:14 2024 +0600 various fields time, phone field, pro fields, image, file, recaptcha, hidden fields commit e58e788 Merge: 2b12da4 f92a621 Author: Sapayth Hossain <[email protected]> Date: Tue Oct 15 17:25:44 2024 +0600 Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into enhance/form_builder_content_body_ui_redesign commit 2b12da4 Author: Sapayth Hossain <[email protected]> Date: Tue Oct 15 17:24:24 2024 +0600 column field, section break commit 63f6663 Author: Sapayth Hossain <[email protected]> Date: Mon Oct 14 21:47:26 2024 +0600 regular fields
…der_stage_form_builder_ui_redesign
…der_stage_form_builder_ui_redesign
…der_stage_form_builder_ui_redesign
…der_stage_form_builder_ui_redesign
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces comprehensive updates across multiple files in the WordPress User Frontend plugin, focusing on enhancing the form builder interface, updating styling, and improving component functionality. The changes span various aspects of the plugin, including Vue.js components, CSS styling, form templates, and administrative interfaces. Key modifications include introducing new form builder versions, refining UI components, and updating asset management. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Nitpick comments (66)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-textarea_field/template.php (1)
8-8
: Consistent use ofbuilder_class_names
is recommended across all form components.Switching to
builder_class_names('textareafield')
aligns with the new class naming approach. Ensure all other fields' classes follow the same pattern for uniformity.assets/less/frontend-forms.less (1)
Line range hint
1-1000
: Consider implementing CSS Custom PropertiesThe codebase heavily uses LESS variables for colors and dimensions. Consider gradually migrating to CSS Custom Properties (CSS Variables) for better runtime customization and theme support.
Example implementation:
-@borderColor: #eee; -@mainColor: #64C3DE; +:root { + --wpuf-border-color: #eee; + --wpuf-main-color: #64C3DE; +}This would allow runtime theme changes and better maintainability.
includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Form_Template.php (1)
85-89
: Condense style enqueue logic.
Although these lines ensure backward compatibility for different versions, consider condensing the logic into a single version-check utility function. This keeps the enqueue code DRY and more maintainable.includes/Admin/Menu.php (2)
120-121
: Consider removing or utilizing$pro_templates
Currently,
$pro_templates
is assigned but never used. Keeping unused variables can introduce confusion and clutter. Suggest removing it if not needed or utilizing it if it serves a purpose.$registry = wpuf_get_post_form_templates(); -$pro_templates = wpuf_get_pro_form_previews();
124-128
: Ensure consistent translation and branding for the mailto linkThe
$footer_help
variable leveragessprintf
with an inline translator comment. Confirm that the user-facing text aligns with your branding guidelines and expected translation context.assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js (2)
53-57
: Consider making these classes configurable for future flexibility.Right now,
action_button_classes
returns a static string of utility classes. If you anticipate needing to update or toggle classes conditionally (e.g., based on props, state, or theming), consider using a more dynamic approach—for example, storing possible class variants in a data property or a computed property that checks relevant state.
95-129
: Extract repeated classes into a lookup object for cleaner, DRY code.Using a switch statement is fine, but consider refactoring the repeated string literals into an external object mapping each type to a class string. For example:
const typeClassMap = { text: "...", textfield: "...", ... }; builder_class_names(type_class) { const commonClasses = typeClassMap[type_class] || ''; return [ /* ... */ commonClasses ]; }This approach may simplify maintenance and readability by centralizing your classes in a single structure.
includes/Admin/template-parts/modal-v4.1.php (2)
107-109
: Add security attributes to external link
When linking to external sites in a new tab, it's best practice to includerel="noopener noreferrer"
to reduce the risk of window manipulation from the linked page.-<a href="<?php echo esc_url( Pro_Prompt::get_upgrade_to_pro_popup_url() ); ?>" - target="_blank" - class="wpuf-btn-primary wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-w-max" - title="<?php echo esc_attr( $template->get_title() ); ?>" > +<a href="<?php echo esc_url( Pro_Prompt::get_upgrade_to_pro_popup_url() ); ?>" + target="_blank" + rel="noopener noreferrer" + class="wpuf-btn-primary wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-w-max" + title="<?php echo esc_attr( $template->get_title() ); ?>" >
131-168
: Consider adding an overlay click-to-close feature
Closing the modal only via the close button or the ESC key might be less intuitive for users. Consider listening for clicks on the modal’s background/overlay to provide a more standard dismissal option.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js (3)
30-38
: jQuery UI draggable
The draggable setup is properly targeting selector.panel-form-field-buttons .wpuf-field-button
. Consider wrapping it in a condition or try-catch to ensure it doesn't error if the expected elements are missing.
68-81
: Simplify null checks with optional chaining
Static analysis suggests using optional chaining. Replacevalidator && validator.msg
withvalidator?.msg
for brevity.- if (validator && validator.msg) { + if (validator?.msg) {🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 71-71: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
92-115
: Avoid aliasingthis
At line 94, the variableself
is assigned tothis
. Using an arrow function or directthis
calls is generally preferable for readability.- var self = this; + // rely on arrow functions or use `this` directly🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 94-94: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits
this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js (4)
489-525
: Branching for post form vs normal form
The code for setting up tabs, clipboard, and tooltips is repeated. Consider DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) patterns if possible.
530-530
: Redeclaringsettings_tabs
Static analysis indicatessettings_tabs
is declared again in this scope (also declared at line 491). Consider renaming to avoid confusion.- var settings_tabs = $('#wpuf-form-builder-settings .nav-tab'), - settings_tab_contents = ... + var secondary_settings_tabs = $('#wpuf-form-builder-settings .nav-tab'), + settings_tab_contents = ...🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 530-530: Shouldn't redeclare 'settings_tabs'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'settings_tabs' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
538-538
: Redeclaringclipboard
The variableclipboard
was also declared earlier at line 499. Consider a different identifier or scoping to avoid overshadowing.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 538-538: Shouldn't redeclare 'clipboard'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'clipboard' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
541-541
: Redeclaringself
var self = this;
is also declared earlier. Prefer directly using arrow functions or sticking to oneself
usage if necessary.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 541-541: Shouldn't redeclare 'self'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'self' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js (4)
489-525
: Conditional form type logic
As in the previous file, consider refactoring the repeated logic for settings tabs and clipboard to reduce duplication.
530-530
: Avoid redeclaringsettings_tabs
Rename or restructure to prevent overshadowing from the earlier declaration in the same scope.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 530-530: Shouldn't redeclare 'settings_tabs'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'settings_tabs' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
538-538
:clipboard
overshadowing
Rename or scope properly, as it’s also declared in line 499.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 538-538: Shouldn't redeclare 'clipboard'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'clipboard' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
541-541
:self
overshadowing
Reusingvar self = this;
is unnecessary. Prefer an arrow function if you need lexical scope.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 541-541: Shouldn't redeclare 'self'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'self' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (3)
85-91
: Provide additional user guidance for blank form state
These lines introduce a helpful blank state with an illustration and descriptive text. It might be beneficial to include more specific instructions, such as “Drag and drop fields from the sidebar” or “Click on a field to configure its settings,” to further guide new users.
306-320
: Multi-select changes
The multi-select approach is well-handled. For large sets of options, ensure that the component doesn't become unwieldy. Lazy-loading or a search integration might be worth adding later.
1047-1157
: New form-fields-v4-1 component
This block introduces a cleaner UI for searching and adding form fields. The search field and dynamic panel toggles are an excellent user experience improvement. As a minor improvement, consider debouncing the search input to reduce performance overhead for large forms.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-email_address/template.php (1)
4-4
: Use array-based class binding for improved readability
While combiningclass_names('email')
andbuilder_class_names('text')
via string concatenation works fine, consider using an array-based syntax for improved clarity and to avoid potential spacing issues:-:class="class_names('email') + builder_class_names('text')" +:class="[class_names('email'), builder_class_names('text')]"admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-textarea/template.php (1)
2-2
: Ensure label is accessible
Adding afor
attribute on the<label>
that matches theid
of the<textarea>
would further improve accessibility by explicitly linking the label and the textarea.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-recaptcha/template.php (1)
7-7
: Provide descriptive alt text
Consider providing a descriptive alt text for the placeholder image. Having an empty alt value might be fine for purely decorative images, but a short description like "reCaptcha placeholder" can improve accessibility for screen readers.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-option-pro-feature-alert/template.php (1)
1-6
: Consider improving the alt text for accessibility.
While"pro icon"
is acceptable, a more descriptive alt text (e.g.,"Pro feature icon"
) might better convey the meaning to screen reader users.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/help-text/index.js (1)
20-23
: Consider using a Vue-based tooltip approach instead of jQuery.
While the tooltip configuration works, relying on jQuery may lead to maintainability issues if your project moves away from jQuery in future versions. You might explore a pure Vue-based tooltip library to keep your stack consistent.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-checkbox/template.php (1)
8-8
: Dynamic class binding for flexibility.
Using:class="builder_class_names('checkbox')"
is an excellent approach to unify styling across different build contexts. Provide documentation on howbuilder_class_names
is computed so new team members can extend or modify it easily.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-dropdown_field/template.php (1)
13-13
: Semantic improvement for help text.
Switching from<span>
to<p>
provides better readability and semantic structure. Use additional ARIA attributes if you need more accessibility cues, for example linking help text with the form control usingaria-describedby
.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-text-meta/template.php (1)
1-13
: Ensure label and input maintain full accessibility compliance.The addition of
:for="option_field.title"
is a step in the right direction for accessibility, but consider binding an actualid
to the<input>
so that thefor
attribute references a valid ID. Matchingfor
/id
pairs provide better accessibility for screen reader users.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-select/index.js (1)
8-13
: Consider i18n and default states for the new dropdown.The newly introduced
showOptions
andselectedOption
properties effectively control the dropdown’s visibility and display text. However, the default string'Select an option'
may need translation for internationalization. Align the UI text with your localization strategy to ensure usability across different languages.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-post_content/template.php (1)
14-14
: Consider removing or replacing<br>
for better semantic structure
The<br>
tag is acceptable for short line breaks, but for a more robust structure, consider using CSS margins or spacing utilities for better maintainability.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-image_upload/template.php (1)
4-16
: Use consistent button label logic and accessibility.
The updated<a>
tag with conditional button labels using SVG icons is a welcome improvement. Make sure the button text (e.g., "Select Image") is either accessible through ARIA attributes or remains visible for screen readers.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-select/template.php (1)
20-21
: Separate concerns in future.
Rendering a full<ul>
for options is fine here, but consider extracting it into a reusable component for better modularity, especially if multiple dropdowns exist.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-taxonomy/template.php (1)
21-21
: Multiple select usage and styling.
The application ofbuilder_class_names('select')
for a multiselect is a good approach. Verify that the class generator handles multi-select-specific needs such as adequate spacing and correct placeholder styling.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-radio_field/template.php (1)
2-17
: Ensure Proper Input Binding for Radios
Currently, the<input>
elements lack explicit Vue bindings for:value
orv-model
. Instead, the label elements control the radio state with:value
and:checked
. While this can work, it’s more common to bind these attributes on the<input>
for clarity and maintainability. Consider moving the bindings to the<input>
if you encounter future issues with radio group state.admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/option-field.js (1)
9-9
: Vue Defaults Must Return Objects
Switching from an empty object to a factory function returning{ key: 'value' }
is the correct approach in Vue to avoid shared state across instances. However, consider if'key'
and'value'
are truly meaningful defaults or simply placeholders. This might cause confusion if these fields are never replaced.Also applies to: 14-14
admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/add-form-field.js (1)
49-54
: Centralize or Reuse Button Classes
Definingaction_button_classes
as a computed property fosters consistency. If more buttons share these classes across the codebase, consider extracting them to a dedicated common styling solution so updates can be made in one place.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-options/template.php (2)
9-15
: Consider adding accessibility attributes for toggle headings
The toggle headings (show_basic_settings
) work well, but adding ARIA attributes such asaria-expanded
andaria-controls
could improve accessibility for screen readers and keyboard users.Example improvement:
<h3 :class="show_basic_settings ? 'wpuf-text-green-600' : 'wpuf-text-gray-500'" class="wpuf-flex wpuf-mt-0 wpuf-mb-6 wpuf-justify-between hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer wpuf-text-sm" @click="show_basic_settings = !show_basic_settings" + :aria-expanded="show_basic_settings" + aria-controls="basic-settings-section" > {{ form_field_type_title }} <i :class="show_basic_settings ? 'fa fa-angle-down wpuf-text-green-600' : 'fa fa-angle-right wpuf-text-gray-500'"></i> </h3> <transition name="slide-fade"> - <div v-show="show_basic_settings" class="option-field-section-fields"> + <div + v-show="show_basic_settings" + class="option-field-section-fields" + id="basic-settings-section" + > ... </div> </transition>
32-37
: Apply the same accessibility improvements for advanced settings
The advanced settings heading mirrors the basic settings toggler. For consistency and improved accessibility, add the same ARIA attributes.admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/form-field.js (1)
36-70
: Consider consolidating repeated class logic
Thebuilder_class_names
method enumerates multiple input types, returning a large switch statement. For maintainability, consider storing each type’s classes in a dictionary, which can simplify updates:Example approach:
builder_class_names: function(type_class) { - var commonClasses = ''; - switch (type_class) { - case 'text': - case 'textfield': - case 'number': - ... - commonClasses = 'wpuf-block wpuf-min-w-full ...'; - break; - ... - } + const mapClasses = { + text: 'wpuf-block wpuf-min-w-full ...', // etc. + textfield: 'wpuf-block wpuf-min-w-full ...', + number: 'wpuf-block wpuf-min-w-full ...', + upload_btn: 'file-selector wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-btn-secondary', + radio: 'wpuf-ml-3 wpuf-block wpuf-text-sm ...', + ... + }; + + const commonClasses = mapClasses[type_class] || ''; return [ type_class, this.required_class(), 'wpuf_' + this.field.name + '_' + this.form_id, commonClasses ]; }admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-visibility/template.php (2)
41-41
: Typographical fix
“condiotional-logic-container” appears to be misspelled. Consider renaming to “conditional-logic-container” for clarity.-<div v-if="'logged_in' === selected" class="condiotional-logic-container wpuf-mt-2"> +<div v-if="'logged_in' === selected" class="conditional-logic-container wpuf-mt-2">
60-60
: Repeated typographical fix
Reuse the corrected spelling “conditional-logic-container” here as well.-<div v-if="'subscribed_users' === selected" class="condiotional-logic-container wpuf-mt-2"> +<div v-if="'subscribed_users' === selected" class="conditional-logic-container wpuf-mt-2">admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-option-data/template.php (2)
2-5
: Improve labeling clarity for the top-level title.
The current label and help text synergy is good. However, consider ensuring screen readers can associate each label with the relevant input for improved accessibility.
23-35
: Grid layout improvements.
Usingwpuf-grid wpuf-grid-cols-4
for the options is valid. Make sure that, on small screens, the layout remains usable and responsive.includes/Fields/Form_Field_Cloudflare_Turnstile.php (1)
41-48
: Wrap Turnstile in<li>
for consistent markup.
This<li>
wrapper and additionalwpuf-fields
class keep styling consistent with other fields. Verify that any CSS or JS scripts that previously targeted the direct<div>
are updated to handle the new structure.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js (4)
113-132
: Consider removing unnecessary aliasing ofthis
.
You setvar self = this;
at line 114, but you’re already using an arrow function in thethen
block. Arrow functions do not redefinethis
, so referencingthis
directly is sufficient:delete_field: function(index) { - var self = this; (Swal.fire({ - text: self.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg, + text: this.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg, ... })).then((result) => { - if (result.isConfirmed) { - self.$store.commit('delete_form_field_element', index); + if (result.isConfirmed) { + this.$store.commit('delete_form_field_element', index); } }); },🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 114-114: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits
this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
144-146
: Simplify boolean return and consider optional chaining.
Line 145 uses a ternary to return a boolean. You can simplify:- return (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature) ? true : false; + return !!(this.field_settings[template]?.pro_feature);🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 145-145: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 145-145: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
167-173
: Optional chaining could improve readability.
At line 168, you can use optional chaining to avoid a repeated&&
check. Example:- if (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].is_full_width) { + if (this.field_settings[template]?.is_full_width) {🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 168-168: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
175-177
: Avoid unnecessary boolean literals in ternary.
At line 176, you can return the conditional directly:- return ( field.recaptcha_type && 'invisible_recaptcha' === field.recaptcha_type ) ? true : false; + return field.recaptcha_type === 'invisible_recaptcha';🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 176-176: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/template.php (1)
35-108
: Dynamic field sections are nicely implemented.
The toggling mechanism, templates, and separate cases for pro/invalid/regular fields enhance control and clarity. Check if you need ARIA roles or labels for improved accessibility.includes/Admin/Forms/Admin_Form_Builder.php (2)
129-129
: Maintain alphabetical consistency if needed.The
'recaptcha'
field was appended at line 129. If there's a strict field ordering convention (alphabetical, usage, etc.), ensure consistency throughout the list.
264-275
: Consider a filter or hook for advanced templating.You introduced conditional logic to include either
form-builder.php
orform-builder-v4.1.php
. A filter or an action might further empower developers to override or extend this selection for custom builder versions.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/index.js (1)
56-56
: Maintain consistent data references.Using
$(this).parent().data('column')
ensures clarity when identifying the drop target, but confirm that no other drag-and-drop functionalities rely on the previous approach. If so, update them consistently.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/template.php (2)
60-61
: Hover-based controls.Using hover states to handle button opacity can declutter the UI but might obscure discoverability for new users. If user testing reveals confusion, consider a tooltip or a minimal indicator.
116-117
: Pro feature link consistency.Rendering a call-to-action for Pro-only features is consistent with the rest of the code. Double-check that the link matches your official marketing or promotional strategy.
includes/Admin/Posting.php (1)
32-39
: Enhance the docblock with correct version tagging.The docblock for
dequeue_assets
references@since WPUF_SINCE
. It would be clearer to replaceWPUF_SINCE
with the actual plugin version (e.g.,@since 4.2.0
), ensuring proper tracking of when this method was introduced.- * @since WPUF_SINCE + * @since 4.2.0includes/Fields/Field_Contract.php (1)
68-72
: Consider input validation for content restriction.The new
content_restriction
field is typed as'text'
, but presumably should be numeric if it represents characters or words. Validate or sanitize numeric input to avoid misuse or confusion.assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js (7)
188-369
: Avoid repeating similar logic across builder components.You introduced
builder-stage-v4-1
as a clone of an existing component. Consider refactoring shared logic into a base or mixin to avoid duplicating code.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits
this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
301-301
: Remove unnecessary 'self' alias in arrow functions.In modern JavaScript, arrow functions inherit
this
, sovar self = this;
is not needed.-delete_field: function(index) { - var self = this; - (Swal.fire({ +delete_field: function(index) { (Swal.fire({🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits
this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
332-332
: Simplify the boolean ternary.The expression can be simplified by directly negating or double-banging the condition.
-return (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature) ? true : false; +return !!(this.field_settings[template]?.pro_feature);🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
355-355
: Use optional chaining for safer property access.You can leverage optional chaining to safely access nested properties without additional checks.
-if (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].is_full_width) { +if (this.field_settings[template]?.is_full_width) {🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
363-363
: Eliminate the explicit boolean ternary.Use a more direct approach to return a boolean.
-return ( field.recaptcha_type && 'invisible_recaptcha' === field.recaptcha_type ) ? true : false; +return field.recaptcha_type === 'invisible_recaptcha';🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
777-782
: Consider a user-friendly default for "Select an option".When opening/hiding the dropdown, you might want to localize or adapt the default text (
'Select an option'
) to the plugin’s language domain.
2020-2023
: Tooltip placement improvement.Replacing
'placement: 'auto top'
with user-defined or dynamic placement can increase the tooltip usability for different screen sizes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (43)
assets/images/adjustments-horizontal.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/arrow-up-tray.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/badge-check.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/check-circle.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/chevron-down.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/clock.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/cloud.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/code-bracket-square.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/code.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/command-line.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/document-check.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/exclamation-circle.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/eye-off.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/form-blank-state.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/globe-alt.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/link.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/location-marker.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/mail.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/map.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/menu-alt-2.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/menu-alt-4.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/photograph.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/play.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/qrcode.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/queue-list.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/recaptcha-placeholder.png
is excluded by!**/*.png
assets/images/rectangle-stack.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/squares-2x2.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/squares-2x2.zip
is excluded by!**/*.zip
assets/images/star.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/stop.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/tag.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/templates/blank.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/templates/edd.png
is excluded by!**/*.png
assets/images/templates/edd.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/templates/event.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/templates/post.png
is excluded by!**/*.png
assets/images/templates/post.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/templates/woocommerce.png
is excluded by!**/*.png
assets/images/templates/woocommerce.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/title.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/view-columns.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (82)
Gruntfile.js
(5 hunks)Lib/Appsero/Client.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage/index.js
(0 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-checkbox/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-checkbox/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-multiselect/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-option-data/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-option-data/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-option-pro-feature-alert/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-options/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-options/template.php
(2 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-radio/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-select/index.js
(2 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-select/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-text-meta/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-text/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-text/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-textarea/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-textarea/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-visibility/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-visibility/template.php
(3 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-checkbox_field/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/index.js
(3 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-custom_hidden_field/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-dropdown_field/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-email_address/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-featured_image/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-image_upload/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-multiple_select/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-post_content/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-post_excerpt/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-post_tags/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-post_title/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-radio_field/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-recaptcha/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-section_break/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-taxonomy/template.php
(3 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-text_field/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-textarea_field/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-website_url/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/help-text/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/help-text/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js
(13 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/add-form-field.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/form-field.js
(3 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/option-field.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/less/form-builder.less
(0 hunks)admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-v4.1.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/views/form-builder.php
(2 hunks)assets/css/admin.css
(0 hunks)assets/css/frontend-forms.css
(1 hunks)assets/js-templates/form-components.php
(16 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
(12 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js
(5 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js
(13 hunks)assets/less/admin.less
(0 hunks)assets/less/frontend-forms.less
(1 hunks)includes/Admin/Admin_Subscription.php
(1 hunks)includes/Admin/Forms/Admin_Form.php
(4 hunks)includes/Admin/Forms/Admin_Form_Builder.php
(4 hunks)includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Form_Template.php
(3 hunks)includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Post_Form_Template_Events_Calendar.php
(1 hunks)includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Post_Form_Template_Post.php
(1 hunks)includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Post_Form_Template_WooCommerce.php
(1 hunks)includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Pro_Form_Preview_EDD.php
(1 hunks)includes/Admin/Forms/Template_Post.php
(1 hunks)includes/Admin/Menu.php
(1 hunks)includes/Admin/Posting.php
(2 hunks)includes/Admin/template-parts/modal-v4.1.php
(1 hunks)includes/Admin/template-parts/modal.php
(5 hunks)includes/Admin/views/post-form.php
(1 hunks)includes/Assets.php
(1 hunks)includes/Fields/Field_Contract.php
(2 hunks)includes/Fields/Form_Field_Checkbox.php
(1 hunks)includes/Fields/Form_Field_Cloudflare_Turnstile.php
(1 hunks)includes/Fields/Form_Field_Column.php
(2 hunks)includes/Fields/Form_Field_Dropdown.php
(1 hunks)
⛔ Files not processed due to max files limit (26)
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Email.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Featured_Image.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Hidden.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Image.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_MultiDropdown.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Numeric.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Content.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Excerpt.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Tags.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Taxonomy.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Post_Title.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Radio.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_SectionBreak.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Text.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Textarea.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_reCaptcha.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Pro_Upgrade_Fields.php
- includes/Frontend_Render_Form.php
- includes/Pro_Upgrades.php
- includes/Setup_Wizard.php
- languages/wp-user-frontend.pot
- package.json
- src/css/admin/form-builder.css
- tailwind.config.js
- tests/chrome_recordings/post form templates.json
- wpuf-functions.php
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage/index.js
- assets/css/admin.css
- admin/form-builder/assets/less/form-builder.less
- assets/less/admin.less
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Checkbox.php
- includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Post_Form_Template_Post.php
- includes/Fields/Form_Field_Dropdown.php
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/help-text/template.php
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-multiple_select/template.php
- includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Post_Form_Template_WooCommerce.php
- includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Post_Form_Template_Events_Calendar.php
- includes/Admin/template-parts/modal.php
- includes/Admin/Forms/Template_Post.php
- includes/Assets.php
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js
[error] 530-530: Shouldn't redeclare 'settings_tabs'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'settings_tabs' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 538-538: Shouldn't redeclare 'clipboard'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'clipboard' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 541-541: Shouldn't redeclare 'self'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'self' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js
[error] 145-145: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 145-145: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 168-168: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 176-176: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 114-114: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js
[error] 71-71: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 94-94: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
[error] 1618-1618: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 1641-1641: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js
[error] 530-530: Shouldn't redeclare 'settings_tabs'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'settings_tabs' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 538-538: Shouldn't redeclare 'clipboard'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'clipboard' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 541-541: Shouldn't redeclare 'self'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'self' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
🔇 Additional comments (160)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-textarea_field/template.php (3)
5-5
: Great fix for the default
binding.
Previously, the binding might have been incorrectly spelled. Using :default="field.default"
ensures proper access and reactivity for the default value.
11-14
: Conditional rendering logic looks sound.
The v-if="'no' !== field.rich"
properly displays the <text-editor>
only when rich
text editing is enabled. Make sure to cover both scenarios in your tests (rich text on and off).
16-16
: Semantic update from span
to p
for help text.
Using a paragraph element (<p>
) enhances readability and consistency with typical block-level text semantics at no functional cost.
assets/less/frontend-forms.less (1)
259-259
: LGTM: Border removal improves visual cleanliness
The removal of the border from .wp-editor-wrap
aligns with modern UI practices and creates a cleaner interface.
assets/css/frontend-forms.css (1)
Line range hint 1-1000
: Generated file looks good
This is an automatically generated CSS file from the LESS source. No issues found in the compilation output.
includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Form_Template.php (2)
19-19
: Revisit commented-out code or remove it entirely.
By commenting out the admin_footer
action, you’re losing the chance to render post form templates directly in the footer. Evaluate whether this is still needed. If it is deprecated, consider removing it altogether to keep the codebase clean.
112-118
: Ensure correct file inclusion for modal template.
The new version-based approach for including the modal template is fine, but verify that the file paths indeed exist and that the correct modal is used for each version. You might also add a fallback for unexpected scenarios.
includes/Admin/Forms/Post/Templates/Pro_Form_Preview_EDD.php (1)
30-30
: Switching from PNG to SVG is a great scalability improvement.
This update ensures better resolution independence and smaller file sizes. However, confirm that the new asset file edd.svg
is present in the assets directory and properly referenced.
You can verify the presence of the SVG file using the following script:
✅ Verification successful
SVG file is correctly placed and referenced
The verification confirms that edd.svg
exists at assets/images/templates/edd.svg
, which matches the path referenced in the code through WPUF_ASSET_URI . '/images/templates/edd.svg'
. The asset is properly placed in the expected directory structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Searching for the file 'edd.svg' in the repository
fd 'edd.svg'
Length of output: 44
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-options/index.js (1)
7-7
: Ensure proper integration of the new mixin
Adding wpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin
is a good step toward a more unified approach to managing form fields. Please make sure this mixin does not introduce conflicting reactive properties or methods that may override the existing functionality from wpuf_mixins.field_options
.
Run the following script to search for potential naming collisions (e.g., methods, computed properties, watchers) across mixin definitions:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the mixin definitions to check for potential conflicts.
Let me gather information about the field_options mixin to complete the analysis.
Let me try a different approach to find the field_options mixin definition.
Let me try one more search to find the field_options mixin definition.
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a definitive response about the mixin integration.
No conflicts found between the mixins
The wpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin
and wpuf_mixins.field_options
appear to be properly integrated without any naming collisions. The form_field_mixin provides basic form field functionality with:
- Props:
field
object - Computed properties:
form_id
,has_options
- Methods:
class_names
,builder_class_names
,required_class
,is_selected
The field_options mixin appears to be used for field option panel functionality and doesn't show any overlapping method or property names with form_field_mixin.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for potential naming collisions between mixin definitions.
# We'll search for definitions in both mixins and compare method/computed property names
rg "computed:|methods:|watch:|props:" -A 20 | grep -E "wpuf_mixins.field_options|wpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin"
Length of output: 613
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the mixin definitions and their contents
ast-grep --pattern 'wpuf_mixins.field_options = {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'wpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin = {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 13486
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the field_options mixin definition
ast-grep --pattern 'wpuf_mixins.field_options = {
$$$
}'
# Also search for any direct references to field_options methods
rg "field_options\." -A 3
Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files that might contain the field_options mixin definition
fd -e js | xargs rg "wpuf_mixins.field_options\s*=" -A 10
# Also search for the file that might contain the mixin definitions
fd "wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js" -x cat
Length of output: 11008
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for field_options in all JavaScript files
rg -l "field_options" | xargs cat
# Also try to find any potential conflicts in method names
rg "methods:|computed:" -A 2 admin/form-builder/assets/js/
Length of output: 82459
includes/Admin/Menu.php (1)
133-133
: Review the required file location
The path to modal-v4.1.php
is loaded via WPUF_ROOT
. Verify that this file exists and is accessible across all environments.
✅ Verification successful
File exists at the expected location
The file modal-v4.1.php
exists at the correct path includes/Admin/template-parts/modal-v4.1.php
relative to the repository root, which aligns with the path being loaded via WPUF_ROOT
. The file is accessible with proper read permissions (644).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the template-parts/modal-v4.1.php file exists.
fd modal-v4.1.php --exec ls -lah
Length of output: 130
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js (4)
68-68
: Great improvement using a factory function for the default prop.
Defining the default as a function returning a new object is a best practice in Vue. This prevents shared references across component instances and avoids unexpected mutations.
83-83
: Closing brace inclusion looks correct.
The syntax of the computed property has_options
is now correct with the closing brace. This resolves any prior parsing issues.
311-311
: Proper default for option_field prop.
Utilizing a function returning an object here follows Vue best practices, preventing shared mutable state across component instances.
316-316
: Good use of a factory function for editing_form_field.
Same reasoning as above—this ensures each prop instance has its own unique data reference.
includes/Admin/template-parts/modal-v4.1.php (1)
100-115
: Verify the safety of inline file reads
The code reads the crown icon file content directly from the file system (file_get_contents( $crown_icon )
). Ensure $crown_icon
always resolves to an expected local file path to prevent potential security risks if the path can be tampered with.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify how $crown_icon
is defined and used.
Let me try a different approach to find the definition and usage of $crown_icon
.
Let me check how WPUF_ROOT is defined to ensure it's secure.
File reads are properly secured with hardcoded paths
The usage of file_get_contents($crown_icon)
is safe because:
$crown_icon
is always defined asWPUF_ROOT . '/assets/images/crown.svg'
WPUF_ROOT
is defined in the main plugin file as__DIR__
, which is a PHP magic constant that provides the directory path of the current file- The file existence is properly checked with
file_exists()
before reading - The SVG file is located at a fixed path within the plugin directory and cannot be manipulated by user input
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that crown.svg is present in the expected location and is not user-controlled.
fd crown.svg
Length of output: 38
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find where $crown_icon is defined and how it's constructed
rg -B 2 -A 2 "\$crown_icon\s*="
Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the file content around the crown icon usage
rg -B 10 -A 2 "file_exists\(\s*\\\$crown_icon\s*\)"
Length of output: 8374
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for WPUF_ROOT definition
rg -B 2 -A 2 "WPUF_ROOT|define.*WPUF_ROOT"
Length of output: 21430
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js (9)
1-3
: Consistent component documentation
The introductory comment block clearly describes the component.
7-8
: Mixins usage
Combining multiple mixins (wpuf_form_builder_mixins
and wpuf_mixins.add_form_field
) is a good practice to keep the component logic organized.
9-14
: Data properties provide clarity
Storing searched_fields
and asset_url
in data is straightforward and keeps dependencies explicit.
16-28
: Computed properties
The computed properties effectively retrieve Vuex store data. No issues or performance concerns identified.
40-44
: panel_toggle
method
Straightforward use of a Vuex mutation to toggle the panel. No issues found.
45-47
: is_pro_feature
method
Relies on field_settings[field].pro_feature
. This is fine if the store’s data is always guaranteed.
49-66
: SweetAlert usage in alert_pro_feature
This is properly set up with a confirm button to open an external link. Implementation looks solid.
83-85
: get_invalidate_btn_class
functionality
Method retrieves a class from store data. This is straightforward and efficient.
87-89
: set_default_panel_sections
method
Resets panel sections using a store commit. No concerns here.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/template.php (4)
1-3
: Readable utility classes
Using utility classes like wpuf-flex
and wpuf-gap-4
enhances maintainability. Good approach for consistent styling.
5-8
: Dynamic columns loop
The v-for
loop with :key="column"
is correct for rendering columns. Ensure each column
in columnClasses
is unique.
14-27
: Column fields iteration
The multi-property usage (e.g., :class
, data-source
, v-for
) is well-structured. Hover and grouping classes look correct for styling.
65-107
: Action buttons
The control panel for editing, copying, and removing fields is clear. The conditionals for failed validation vs. normal usage are well-handled. No major issues spotted.
admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-v4.1.php (4)
1-4
: Semantic form structure
Wrapping the builder in a <form>
with @submit.prevent="save_form_builder"
is clean and intuitive for capturing save events.
13-23
: Editable form title
Toggling post_title_editing
with icons is user-friendly. The computed visual states are handled by toggling classes. Nicely done.
89-107
: Preview and Save button states
Using v-if="!is_form_saving"
and the subsequent v-else
to show a loader is a good example of reactive UI.
153-176
: Tabbed interface
The usage of v-show="active_tab === 'form-editor'"
and v-show="active_tab === 'form-settings'"
is a straightforward approach to display different sections. This improves user experience clearly.
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js (7)
44-46
: Flags for older form and post form
is_older_form
and is_post_form
help differentiate form types. Ensure consistent updates if additional form types appear.
73-73
: Editing field reset
Conditionally resetting editing_field_id
when switching panels is a neat approach to avoid residual states in the UI.
Line range hint 93-108
: open_field_settings
mutation
Filters the correct field from form_fields
. The setTimeout
ensures the panel transitions before setting the editing_field_id
. This is a valid approach.
245-245
: Adjust current_panel
upon deletion
Switching back to 'form-fields-v4-1'
or 'form-fields'
after deleting a field prevents leftover state references.
397-399
: set_panel_sections
mutation
Assigns sections
to state.panel_sections
. Straightforward.
401-404
: set_default_panel_sections
mutation
Resets panel sections to the original wpuf_form_builder.panel_sections
. Helpful for reverting.
423-428
: New data properties
enableMultistep
, shortcodeCopied
, active_tab
, and active_settings_tab
add clarity for new UI features.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js (8)
44-46
: Flag usage
Defining is_older_form
and is_post_form
in state is consistent with the logic from the rest of the builder.
73-73
: Panel reset
Resets editing_field_id
correctly when toggling to a field list panel. Good to maintain consistency.
Line range hint 93-108
: open_field_settings
Same pattern as seen elsewhere. Filtering the correct field ensures minimal overhead, and the setTimeout
for transitions is practical.
245-245
: Deleting field concurrency
Switching current_panel
to 'form-fields-v4-1'
or 'form-fields'
helps avoid dangling references.
392-392
: Deleting a column field
Similar logic to single-field deletion. Properly references is_older_form
to revert the panel.
396-399
: set_panel_sections
Straight assignment to store. Straightforward.
401-404
: set_default_panel_sections
Pulling defaults from wpuf_form_builder.panel_sections
is a tidy approach for easy resets.
423-428
: Extended data properties
Storing isDirty
, enableMultistep
, shortcodeCopied
, active_tab
, and logoUrl
in data is consistent with the updated form builder interface.
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (7)
93-205
: Double-check accessibility and keyboard interactions
This entire block defines the main form structure and field controls. Although it looks visually appealing, ensure that drag-and-drop and other interactive elements are usable with a keyboard (focus states, ARIA attributes). Consider verifying it for screen-readers as well.
210-283
: Hidden fields block
The hidden fields section is well-structured. The controls for editing, cloning, and removing hidden fields are consistent with other fields. This looks good.
285-294
: Checkbox template checks
The <input type="checkbox">
loop is straightforward. Consider verifying that any newly introduced classes match your project’s BEM/utility guidelines for styling consistency.
327-435
: Dynamic option data
This section handles dynamic addition/removal of options with checkboxes/radio input. Carefully watch for edge cases, such as when no options remain or when label/value contain special characters.
441-446
: Pro feature alerts & field options
The “Pro Version” alert logic and the basic/advanced settings toggles look consistent. Make sure that external links open in new tabs (target="_blank"
) and that the user is not trapped post-navigation (add rel="noopener"
if needed for security).
Also applies to: 452-488
512-548
: Various field templates
All these field templates (radio, select, text, hidden, featured image, multiple select, post content/excerpt/tags/title, etc.) share a consistent layout pattern and styling approach. Continue ensuring that the new utility classes (wpuf-text-sm
, wpuf-text-gray-500
, etc.) are uniformly applied across the entire form builder. Also, confirm that HTML-escaped or sanitized outputs are used for user-generated content, particularly in help texts, to prevent any risk of XSS injection.
Also applies to: 573-596, 602-624, 629-641, 647-650, 656-693, 743-777, 929-934, 946-955, 963-968, 976-991, 1189-1189, 1208-1250
1162-1181
: Remaining field partial templates
The updated image upload, radio-field, section-break, taxonomy, and other textual field components align with the approach used elsewhere. This maintains consistency. Everything seems properly introduced and integrated.
Also applies to: 1285-1317, 1335-1352, 1360-1402, 1413-1462
includes/Admin/views/post-form.php (1)
1-10
: Conditional rendering of builder hooks
Switching between wpuf_admin_form_builder
and wpuf_admin_form_builder_view
based on the WPUF Pro version introduces new flexibility. Confirm it still meets backward compatibility requirements for older sites without WPUF_PRO_VERSION
.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-website_url/template.php (1)
4-9
: Consistent use of builder_class_names for URL inputs
Switching to builder_class_names('url')
keeps styling consistent with other form elements. This looks good.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-text_field/template.php (1)
7-9
: Refactored class binding and help text semantics
Using builder_class_names('textfield')
aligns with the broader shift to utility-based classes. Displaying help text in a <p>
element is more semantic. Good change.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-custom_hidden_field/template.php (1)
4-9
: Hidden field styling improvements
Changing the class binding for the hidden field and updating help text to a <p>
improves consistency and readability.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-email_address/template.php (1)
9-9
: Good semantic improvement
Using a <p>
element instead of a <span>
for help text is more semantically appropriate for paragraph content, improves accessibility, and provides better structure for screen readers.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-textarea/template.php (1)
5-5
: Dynamic class usage is consistent and flexible
Good use of builder_class_names('textareafield')
for tailoring styles. It aligns with the plugin’s pattern of configurable classes for form fields.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-textarea/index.js (1)
5-6
: Seamless mixin integration
Adding wpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin
here leverages reusable functionality across form fields, promoting cleaner and more maintainable code.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-post_title/template.php (1)
7-8
: Verify interaction between dynamic and static class attributes.
You have :class="class_names('textfield')"
and a static class
on the same element. Double-check that these do not conflict. In Vue, they are merged, but reviewing them for consistency helps avoid style overrides or unexpected results.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-post_tags/template.php (1)
4-5
: Ensure builder_class_names usage is consistent.
Using :class="builder_class_names('text')"
plus a static class
is typically fine in Vue, but confirm that it doesn’t inadvertently override or duplicate computed classes.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-post_excerpt/template.php (1)
4-4
: Confirm correct usage of builder_class_names.
This helper method is introduced to handle dynamic classes. Verify it merges well with any static classes or if you want to rely on a single approach for styling consistency.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-multiselect/template.php (3)
1-1
: Update looks good for conditional rendering.
Using v-if="met_dependencies"
ensures the component does not render at all unless dependencies are met, which can improve performance and hide unneeded DOM elements.
8-8
: Ensure consistent usage of Tailwind utility classes.
The newly added utility classes (wpuf-w-full wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-border-primary wpuf-z-30
) appear consistent with the plugin’s styling approach. Consider verifying that these classes align well with any global design tokens or guidelines.
12-15
: Confirm custom states styling.
The checked:wpuf-bg-primary
class indicates a Tailwind variant for the checked state, which is not always natively supported for <option>
elements. Verify that this class is effectively applied or recognized by your styling pipeline for multi-select options.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-checkbox/template.php (2)
1-1
: Addition of margin utilities.
Using wpuf-mb-6
adds spacing between checkbox groups. This is a helpful design improvement, but ensure consistency with other form-field spacing.
6-6
: Inline vs. stacked checkboxes.
class="wpuf-mt-2"
for each list item enhances spacing. If multiple checkboxes need to be displayed inline, verify that option_field.inline
is being handled properly to remove or override this top margin when desired.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-dropdown_field/template.php (1)
4-4
: Leverage utility classes for cohesive design.
The addition of multiple utility classes (wpuf-text-gray-900
, wpuf-rounded-md
, etc.) systematically streamlines design. Consider highlighting these new classes in your documentation for consistent usage across components.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-text/index.js (1)
5-6
: Include validation or compatibility checks for the new mixin.
Adding wpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin
can introduce shared methods and computed properties beneficial for maintaining consistent behavior across multiple field types. However, ensure that any dependencies or validations in the form_field_mixin
are satisfied by this component to prevent potential compatibility issues.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-text/template.php (1)
2-24
: Review edge cases for field variations and ensure fallback UI.
The logic for rendering <input type="number">
or <input type="text">
covers two specific conditions, but if option_field.variation
is defined yet not 'number'
, there might be a scenario where neither input is rendered. Consider a fallback or an else-case to handle any additional field variations or unexpected states. Additionally, the usage of builder_class_names('text')
is a good approach for dynamically setting CSS classes.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-section_break/template.php (2)
1-8
: Consistent use of conditional rendering for "regular" divider mode
The new layout correctly distinguishes the "regular" divider mode and applies the expected styling for the title, description, and border. This approach improves code clarity and layout consistency.
9-18
: Well-structured dashed divider layout
Using wpuf-flex
along with the border sections on each side of the title cleanly represents a dashed divider. This is an effective way to visually differentiate the two layout modes.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-checkbox/index.js (1)
5-6
: Addition of form_field_mixin
for enhanced reusability
Incorporating wpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin
improves code reuse and consistency across form fields. This approach centralizes common logic, making it easier to maintain and extend component functionality.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-post_content/template.php (3)
2-4
: Good use of strict equality for field.insert_image
Switching from loose equality to strict equality (=== 'yes'
) is a best practice that helps avoid unintended type coercions.
5-12
: Successful integration of SVG icon in the upload button
Adding an SVG icon inside the button improves visual clarity. The dynamic class binding with builder_class_names('upload_btn')
maintains styling consistency across components.
18-18
: Clear distinction between rich
and non-rich text areas
Using a conditional to determine rendering of text-editor
vs. <textarea>
helps provide a flexible editing experience appropriate to the field’s setting.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-featured_image/template.php (3)
4-5
: Uniform button styling with utility classes
The new classes (wpuf-inline-flex
, wpuf-items-center
, wpuf-gap-x-1.5
) create consistent spacing and alignment for the button. Dynamic class binding also promotes a cohesive UI.
10-12
: SVG icon enhances visual clarity
Including an inline SVG next to custom button text is an excellent step for improved discoverability. The new icon helps users identify the upload action.
19-19
: Improved accessibility and semantics for help text
Replacing <span>
with <p>
and adding descriptive utility classes (wpuf-text-sm
, etc.) makes the help text more noticeable and semantically correct.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-image_upload/template.php (1)
23-23
: Help text styling is clear and consistent.
Switching from <span>
to <p>
for the help text with new classes can improve readability and consistency with the rest of the UI. No further change required.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-visibility/index.js (1)
5-6
: Good addition of the form field mixin.
Incorporating wpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin
unifies class handling and data management for form fields. This should reduce duplicated logic across components.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-select/template.php (3)
11-15
: Maintain consistent icon usage.
The toggling of fa-angle-up
and fa-angle-down
is good. Ensure that the same icon library is used consistently in the rest of the form builder for a uniform user experience.
17-19
: Ensure dropdown positioning in small screens.
Positioning across various devices is crucial. The wpuf-z-30
class is a good start, but confirm there's enough z-index to avoid overlay issues on mobile.
22-26
: Update selected value consistently.
The inline handler @click="[value = key, showOptions = false, selectedOption = option]"
is succinct, but ensure that local state is updated properly in sync with any Vuex store or higher-level parent component state if needed.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-taxonomy/template.php (4)
4-5
: Dynamic classes for select elements appear correct.
Using builder_class_names('select')
ensures consistent styling across multiple form fields. Keep verifying the returned class list.
10-12
: Confirm uniform styling for nested selects.
The nested <select>
using builder_class_names('select')
might differ in styling from the top-level version. Ensure consistent UI across different taxonomy field types.
40-42
: Dynamic placeholder and size attributes.
Well done dynamically binding placeholder
and size
. This is more flexible than a static approach.
46-46
: Help text styling.
Replacing <span>
with <p>
and adding a consistent text style, as in other form components, keeps the UI uniform.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-radio_field/template.php (2)
19-32
: Inline Radio Structure Looks Good
The inline radio layout is neatly done. This approach is consistent with modern UI patterns and helps maintain styling parity with the non-inline block above.
34-34
: Consider Sanitizing HTML in Help Text
Using v-html
can introduce security risks if the source data is not sanitized. Ensure field.help
is safe or sanitized upstream to prevent potential XSS attacks.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-radio/template.php (2)
2-19
: Well-Structured Radio Groups
The radio group logic and help-text display are clear. The code effectively handles met dependencies and nicely separates label and help text. Good job!
21-38
: Inline Layout Implementation
Displaying the radio options inline is handled gracefully. The conditional margin class on the label (:class="index !== 0 ? 'wpuf-ml-2' : ''"
) is a nice touch to ensure spacing consistency.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-options/template.php (1)
1-1
: Consistent use of utility classes
Adding the wpuf-px-6
class here enhances the horizontal padding, aligning it with other Tailwind-like utility classes in the codebase.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/form-field.js (2)
9-9
: Preventing shared object references
Using a factory function for the default prop ensures a fresh object is returned each time, preventing accidental mutations across instances.
24-24
: Syntactical correction
This closing brace correctly terminates the has_options
computed property definition. No further changes required.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-visibility/template.php (5)
2-7
: Usage of flex layout for title and help text
Switching to a flex-container here is a clean approach, allowing the label and help text to occupy separate spaces more naturally.
9-21
: Radio group styling
The new layout and classes for the non-inline radio group look consistent and user-friendly. Ensure it aligns visually with other field types for uniform design.
23-39
: Streamlined inline radio group
Using wpuf-flex
and wpuf-flex-wrap
for inline layout is consistent with the rest of the UI logic. This change is cohesive with the non-inline case above.
50-51
: Consistent application of builder classes
Using :class="builder_class_names('checkbox')"
unifies the styling for checkboxes consistently across the builder. This is a solid approach.
70-71
: Subscription logic emergent
The subscription listing approach with checkboxes is consistent and straightforward. Continue verifying that the builder_class_names
usage (if needed) is applied uniformly across these dynamic inputs.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-option-data/index.js (1)
9-10
: Verify potential overlap of methods from multiple mixins
Adding wpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin
alongside option_field_mixin
is beneficial, but confirm no method name collisions or overshadowing occurs.
Use a script to search for identical method names among these mixins:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to find the mixin methods.
After analyzing the mixin files, I can now provide a definitive response about potential method collisions between option_field_mixin
and form_field_mixin
.
No method name collisions found between the mixins
The analysis of both mixins shows they have distinct, non-overlapping methods:
-
option_field_mixin
methods:update_value()
-
form_field_mixin
methods:class_names()
builder_class_names()
required_class()
is_selected()
Each mixin serves a different purpose and their methods are uniquely named, so there's no risk of method overshadowing or collisions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Searching for duplicate method names in mixins
ast-grep --pattern $'export default {
methods: {
$_() {}
}
}'
Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's locate the mixin files
fd mixin -t f
# Then, let's examine their content
echo "=== Content of found mixin files ==="
fd mixin -t f -x cat {}
Length of output: 13755
Lib/Appsero/Client.php (1)
168-168
: Ensure parameter usage aligns with WordPress best practices.
Changing the get_plugin_data
call to ( $this->file, true, false )
sets $markup = true
and $translate = false
. This should be valid, but confirm you really do not want translation to occur for plugin headers, as translations will be bypassed.
Would you like a script to scan for references to translated plugin data to ensure consistency?
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-option-data/template.php (2)
7-22
: Validate the two checkbox states.
Both the “Show values” and “Sync values” checkboxes are placed close together, which is convenient. Ensure they do not conflict logically (e.g., the app can handle both states being true).
36-110
: Optimize v-for list management and user actions.
- The
v-for
loop for adding, removing, and sorting items is correct; confirm you handle index references carefully when reordering. - The “Delete” and “Add” buttons rely on an index-based approach. Confirm no data reactivity issues occur when arrays shrink or expand.
Would you like me to generate a test snippet that programmatically verifies these actions in different sequences (add multiple items, remove from the middle, reorder, etc.)?
includes/Fields/Form_Field_Column.php (2)
13-13
: Icon name updated to view-columns
.
Ensure this new icon reference exists in your icon set or library so it displays correctly.
83-83
: Clarify maximum columns help text.
The updated text clarifies a maximum of 3 columns. Ensure your client-side validations (e.g., in the form builder) reflect the same constraint to avoid mismatches.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js (8)
1-2
: New component registration looks good.
This new builder-stage-v4-1
component is well-structured and follows Vue’s component registration pattern.
4-4
: Mixins usage is consistent.
Using the wpuf_form_builder_mixins
and other mixins keeps the code DRY and modular.
6-28
: Computed properties are clear.
They provide straightforward access to Vuex state, ensuring data is reactive.
30-82
: Sortable initialization is properly placed in mounted.
The jQuery UI sortable instance effectively handles reordering. Verify if older browsers or Vue's reactivity might cause unexpected behaviors. Otherwise, looking good.
84-88
: Function naming is intuitive.
open_field_settings
succinctly reflects its functionality. Implementation is straightforward.
89-111
: Cloning logic is correct.
The duplicate handling is clear, and the error feedback for single-instance fields is user-friendly.
134-142
: delete_hidden_field
method merges well with delete_field
.
Looping to locate the matching hidden field is fine, though you could exit after deletion for efficiency.
179-182
: Field naming retrieval is straightforward.
Ensures a uniform approach for retrieving the user-facing name of each field.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/template.php (1)
1-34
: Search functionality and input design are well-structured.
The conditional icons for empty vs. non-empty search input provide straightforward user feedback.
admin/form-builder/views/form-builder.php (2)
42-42
: Inline variable usage is consistent.
The $form_id
usage here is straightforward and contextually relevant for copying the shortcode.
59-59
: List styling for form switcher is user-friendly.
The extra classes .button.ui-draggable.ui-draggable-handle
improve drag-and-drop interactions. Consider verifying cross-browser support.
Gruntfile.js (5)
2-6
: Definition of tailwindFileMap
extends build capabilities.
This approach is clean. Just ensure you keep it in sync with other relevant template or CSS paths as they expand.
119-133
: New tailwind
watch target is well-organized.
Monitors relevant files for changes and triggers the shell:tailwind
task. This automated flow helps maintain consistent styling.
245-249
: Tailwind shell command is clearly parameterized.
This pattern helps dynamically generate commands. Provides a future-proof approach for working with multiple input-output pairs.
279-283
: Watch callback extends build pipeline logically.
Running 'tailwind'
as part of the watch flow ensures styles remain updated in real-time.
285-301
: Tailwind Grunt task is flexible and robust.
The iteration over tailwindFileMap
is straightforward, verifying file existence before running the command. Good job.
includes/Admin/Forms/Admin_Form_Builder.php (4)
51-51
: Good use of a new action hook.
Adding the wpuf_admin_form_builder_view
action helps isolate and extend specific view logic for the form builder, enhancing flexibility for versioned templates.
166-166
: Confirm the usage of root_dir
.
'root_dir' => WPUF_ROOT,
is localized. Verify that other parts of the code rely on this variable or if it might be unnecessary. Overexposing directory structures could pose security concerns if misused.
172-172
: Version check logic looks good.
This conditionally sets is_older_form
by comparing WPUF_PRO_VERSION
. Ensure that all references to this flag within Vuex or other components gracefully handle false
or undefined states if the constant is missing.
279-279
: Documentation clarity improved.
The updated doc comment for the i18n
method clarifies its purpose. This is helpful for contributors who consult inline documentation.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/index.js (4)
29-29
: Selector refinement.
Changing the selector to ".wpuf-field-columns .wpuf-column-inner-fields"
might affect any existing code or styles depending on the old selector. Ensure all references to the previous selector are updated or removed.
62-62
: Prevent accidental removal of non-related elements.
$(this).find('.wpuf-field-button').remove();
effectively clears the button. Double-check that no other elements share the class .wpuf-field-button
inside this container. If so, consider scoping more narrowly.
117-118
: Clear and concise action button styles.
Defining action_button_classes
with a short string is straightforward. Consider moving to a design utility layer if these classes are reused across multiple components.
121-130
: Computed property for dynamic column classes.
This is a good approach for programmatically generating column classes based on the number of columns. Keep an eye on potential off-by-one errors if the number of columns changes outside the expected range.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/template.php (8)
1-6
: Improved blank-state UX.
Displaying a helpful illustration and guidance text when no form fields are present is an excellent user experience enhancement.
8-10
: Label type binding is flexible.
Binding :class="['form-label-' + label_type]"
seamlessly handles label styling. Ensure label_type
is consistently set and validated in your Vuex/store or parent component.
16-21
: Conditional classes for form fields.
Applying multiple classes conditionally ('field-items', 'wpuf-el', ...
) is helpful for styling and referencing. Confirm consistency with existing field-specific CSS rules.
23-25
: Highlighting selected fields.
The class logic applies a distinct border and background color when editing_form_id
matches the current field ID. This improves the editing experience. Ensure unused states are gracefully handled (e.g., no editing field).
83-95
: Handling invalid fields gracefully.
Disabling controls for fields that failed validation is effective. Confirm that the user receives adequate feedback on why a field is invalid and how to fix it.
126-131
: Hidden fields grouping.
Providing a dedicated section for hidden fields, along with clarity on keys and values, is beneficial. Ensure that any toggling logic or advanced settings for hidden fields are documented for future maintainers.
139-193
: Consistent control layout.
Reusing the same approach for hover-based control buttons in hidden fields ensures UI uniformity. Verify that the styling and control states match the main field items for a cohesive user experience.
197-198
: Customizable bottom area.
do_action( 'wpuf_form_builder_template_builder_stage_bottom_area' )
allows further extensibility. Good practice for plugin-based extension in the WordPress ecosystem.
includes/Admin/Forms/Admin_Form.php (9)
199-199
: Conditional rendering for Post Settings.
Using v-show="active_settings_tab === '#wpuf-metabox-settings'"
is a straightforward and performant solution for toggling sections. Double-check that the default tab is set properly.
203-203
: Consistent tab structure.
Ensuring uniform naming conventions (#wpuf-metabox-settings-update
) keeps the code base coherent and predictable, especially where IDs or anchors are used across multiple files.
207-207
: Clear naming for submission restrictions.
Making the tab ID #wpuf-metabox-submission-restriction
explicit clarifies its functionality. Verify that any references to the older ID are also updated.
211-211
: Explicit Payment Settings tab.
This ensures logical separation of payment-related configurations from other settings, making the UI more user-friendly.
215-215
: Dedicated Display Settings tab.
Following the same pattern, the display tab provides clarity on customizing how the form is rendered. This fosters better UX for end users.
219-219
: Post Expiration handling.
The newly introduced tab #wpuf-metabox-post_expiration
calls form_post_expiration()
. Ensure any advanced expiration logic is validated in the context of user roles or custom post types.
237-254
: Dynamic tab highlighting for Post/Edit/Restrictions/etc.
Binding the nav-tab-active
class to the condition :class="active_settings_tab === '...'"
is elegant. Ensure the default active tab is set appropriately if a user visits these settings for the first time.
270-274
: Additional Notification tab.
Adding a dedicated “Notification” tab for post forms centralizes email or admin notice settings. Double-check that references to the new tab remain consistent with the rest of the builder logic.
290-290
: Conditional content blocks in “Notification” tab.
The v-show="active_tab === 'notification'"
ensures the content is only displayed when relevant. Test thoroughly to confirm that any asynchronous calls or template logic are properly bound to the tab’s state.
includes/Admin/Posting.php (2)
25-25
: Assert code consistency for action hooks.
Adding admin_enqueue_scripts
for dequeue_assets
is consistent with the approach. However, ensure that dequeue_assets
doesn't conflict with other asset-loading sequences in the admin area.
63-69
: Confirm style handle availability.
When enqueuing either wpuf-admin-form-builder
or wpuf-form-builder
, confirm both style handles are actually registered. If one of them is missing, you may end up with an unregistered handle error.
includes/Fields/Field_Contract.php (1)
381-381
: Improve clarity in help text.
Changing from “Read only” to “Make this field read only” is clearer. You may want to mention explicitly if it’s only for frontend forms to reduce confusion.
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js (6)
610-610
: Validate field_options usage.
When mixing field_options
with form_field_mixin
, ensure you handle potential conflicts in watchers or computed properties between these mixins.
805-806
: Good approach for combining mixins.
Combining option_field_mixin
and form_field_mixin
can reduce duplication. This looks consistent with your approach in other fields.
876-877
: Ensure consistent approach for multiline fields.
wpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin
usage in field-textarea
is consistent with text fields. Verify the watch or computed properties manage multiline input properly.
897-898
: Check naming consistency of "visibility" field.
Confirm that the naming (field-visibility
) matches any usage in the code or data store. Potential confusion can arise if the naming doesn’t match the data pieces used elsewhere.
Line range hint 1028-1061
: Leverage internal sorting or reorder strategy for columns.
The code manipulates column fields’ drag/drop logic. Confirm that you have robust error handling if multiple simultaneous drags occur or if the user moves a field to an invalid column.
1548-1664
: Search-based panel filtering is well-integrated.
The approach to filter panel sections based on the user’s search text is clean. Double-check edge cases, such as an empty or special-character search, to avoid partial or unintended matches.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 1618-1618: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 1641-1641: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
includes/Admin/Admin_Subscription.php (1)
251-251
: LGTM!
Using a fallback 0
if billing_amount
is not set avoids undefined index notices. This is a clean fix for potential errors.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-checkbox_field/template.php (1)
2-17
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add key attribute to v-for directive for optimal rendering performance.
The v-for directive is missing a key attribute, which Vue.js requires for optimal list rendering and maintaining component state.
Apply this diff:
- v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options"
+ v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" :key="val"
Please ensure that:
- The
builder_class_names('checkbox')
method is properly implemented - The
is_selected
method correctly validates the checkbox state
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the concerns by checking the implementation of the mentioned methods.
This will help us verify:
- The implementation of
builder_class_names
method - The implementation of
is_selected
method - The location of the component's script file to check the methods' implementations
Let me try a different approach to find these implementations.
This should help us find:
- The component's script file with correct extensions
- The implementation of both methods either in the component or in a base component/mixin
- Any potential base component that might contain these shared methods
Based on the search results, I found that both builder_class_names
and is_selected
methods are implemented in the form field mixin:
builder_class_names
is implemented inadmin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/form-field.js
is_selected
is also implemented in the same mixin file with proper array checking logic:
is_selected: function (label) {
if (_.isArray(this.field.selected)) {
if (_.indexOf(this.field.selected, label) >= 0) {
return true;
}
}
}
The key attribute can be safely added as both required methods are properly implemented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for builder_class_names implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'builder_class_names'
# Search for is_selected implementation in the component
ast-grep --pattern 'is_selected'
# Find the component's script file
fd "form-checkbox_field" --type f
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the component's script file with a more specific pattern
fd "form-checkbox_field" --type f --extension js --extension vue
# Use ripgrep to search for method implementations
rg "builder_class_names" -A 5
rg "is_selected" -A 5
# Look for any base component or mixin that might contain these methods
rg "export default" -A 10 --type js
Length of output: 35468
if ( ! $registry ) { | ||
break; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Provide fallback or explanatory UI when no templates are available
When $registry
is empty, the logic breaks out without informing the user. Consider gracefully handling the empty state by providing a helpful message or alternative UI.
if ( ! $registry ) {
+ echo '<p>' . esc_html__( 'No form templates available.', 'wp-user-frontend' ) . '</p>';
break;
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
if ( ! $registry ) { | |
break; | |
} | |
if ( ! $registry ) { | |
echo '<p>' . esc_html__( 'No form templates available.', 'wp-user-frontend' ) . '</p>'; | |
break; | |
} |
<div class="wpuf-relative wpuf-group"> | ||
<?php | ||
if ( $image ) { | ||
printf( '<img src="%s" alt="%s">', esc_attr( $image ), esc_attr( $title ) ); | ||
} | ||
?> | ||
<p class="wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-700 wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-justify-center"> | ||
<?php | ||
echo esc_html( $title ); | ||
if ( file_exists( $crown_icon ) ) { | ||
printf( '<span class="pro-icon-title wpuf-ml-2"> %s</span>', file_get_contents( $crown_icon ) ); | ||
} | ||
?> | ||
</p> | ||
|
||
<div class="wpuf-absolute wpuf-opacity-0 group-hover:wpuf-opacity-100 wpuf-transition-all wpuf-z-10 wpuf-text-center wpuf-flex wpuf-flex-col wpuf-bg-green-700/70 wpuf-h-full wpuf-w-full wpuf-top-0 wpuf-left-0 wpuf-text-white wpuf-p-10 wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-justify-center"> | ||
<a href="<?php echo esc_url( Pro_Prompt::get_upgrade_to_pro_popup_url() ); ?>" | ||
target="_blank" | ||
class="wpuf-btn-primary wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-w-max" | ||
title="<?php echo esc_attr( $template->get_title() ); ?>" > | ||
<?php | ||
esc_html_e( 'Upgrade to PRO', 'wp-user-frontend' ); | ||
if ( file_exists( $crown_icon ) ) { | ||
printf( '<span class="pro-icon wpuf-ml-2"> %s</span>', file_get_contents( $crown_icon ) ); | ||
} | ||
?> | ||
</a> | ||
</div> | ||
</li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mismatched closing tag for <li>
It appears that there is a stray </li>
tag at line 119 without a corresponding opening <li>
tag. This may cause unexpected layout or styling issues.
Below is a possible fix to replace </li>
with </div>
:
- </li>
+ </div>
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<div class="wpuf-relative wpuf-group"> | |
<?php | |
if ( $image ) { | |
printf( '<img src="%s" alt="%s">', esc_attr( $image ), esc_attr( $title ) ); | |
} | |
?> | |
<p class="wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-700 wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-justify-center"> | |
<?php | |
echo esc_html( $title ); | |
if ( file_exists( $crown_icon ) ) { | |
printf( '<span class="pro-icon-title wpuf-ml-2"> %s</span>', file_get_contents( $crown_icon ) ); | |
} | |
?> | |
</p> | |
<div class="wpuf-absolute wpuf-opacity-0 group-hover:wpuf-opacity-100 wpuf-transition-all wpuf-z-10 wpuf-text-center wpuf-flex wpuf-flex-col wpuf-bg-green-700/70 wpuf-h-full wpuf-w-full wpuf-top-0 wpuf-left-0 wpuf-text-white wpuf-p-10 wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-justify-center"> | |
<a href="<?php echo esc_url( Pro_Prompt::get_upgrade_to_pro_popup_url() ); ?>" | |
target="_blank" | |
class="wpuf-btn-primary wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-w-max" | |
title="<?php echo esc_attr( $template->get_title() ); ?>" > | |
<?php | |
esc_html_e( 'Upgrade to PRO', 'wp-user-frontend' ); | |
if ( file_exists( $crown_icon ) ) { | |
printf( '<span class="pro-icon wpuf-ml-2"> %s</span>', file_get_contents( $crown_icon ) ); | |
} | |
?> | |
</a> | |
</div> | |
</li> | |
<div class="wpuf-relative wpuf-group"> | |
<?php | |
if ( $image ) { | |
printf( '<img src="%s" alt="%s">', esc_attr( $image ), esc_attr( $title ) ); | |
} | |
?> | |
<p class="wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-700 wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-justify-center"> | |
<?php | |
echo esc_html( $title ); | |
if ( file_exists( $crown_icon ) ) { | |
printf( '<span class="pro-icon-title wpuf-ml-2"> %s</span>', file_get_contents( $crown_icon ) ); | |
} | |
?> | |
</p> | |
<div class="wpuf-absolute wpuf-opacity-0 group-hover:wpuf-opacity-100 wpuf-transition-all wpuf-z-10 wpuf-text-center wpuf-flex wpuf-flex-col wpuf-bg-green-700/70 wpuf-h-full wpuf-w-full wpuf-top-0 wpuf-left-0 wpuf-text-white wpuf-p-10 wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-justify-center"> | |
<a href="<?php echo esc_url( Pro_Prompt::get_upgrade_to_pro_popup_url() ); ?>" | |
target="_blank" | |
class="wpuf-btn-primary wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-w-max" | |
title="<?php echo esc_attr( $template->get_title() ); ?>" > | |
<?php | |
esc_html_e( 'Upgrade to PRO', 'wp-user-frontend' ); | |
if ( file_exists( $crown_icon ) ) { | |
printf( '<span class="pro-icon wpuf-ml-2"> %s</span>', file_get_contents( $crown_icon ) ); | |
} | |
?> | |
</a> | |
</div> | |
</div> |
> | ||
<span v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-help" v-html="field.help" /> | ||
<p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check for potential XSS through “v-html” usage.
v-html="field.help"
will render raw HTML and can expose the app to XSS if field.help
is not sanitized. Confirm that the field's content is trusted or sanitized server-side.
:placeholder="field.placeholder" | ||
:value="field.default" | ||
:size="field.size" | ||
> | ||
|
||
<span v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-help" v-html="field.help" /> | ||
<p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Potential XSS through “v-html”.
Same concern as in other files—ensure field.help
is sanitized to mitigate XSS risks.
:rows="field.rows" | ||
:cols="field.cols" | ||
>{{ field.default }}</textarea> | ||
|
||
<text-editor v-if="'no' !== field.rich" :rich="field.rich" :default_text="field.default"></text-editor> | ||
|
||
<span v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-help" v-html="field.help" ></span> | ||
<p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Prevent XSS on help text.
v-html="field.help"
can render malicious HTML if field.help
is not sanitized. Confirm the data is validated prior to binding.
:placeholder="field.placeholder" | ||
:default_text="field.default" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review duplication of default text.
You have :default_text="field.default"
and also {{ field.default }}
within <textarea>
. This can cause confusion or duplication in your final output. Consider removing one to keep the logic consistent.
<textarea
v-if="'no' === field.rich"
:class="builder_class_names('textareafield')"
:placeholder="field.placeholder"
- :default_text="field.default"
:rows="field.rows"
:cols="field.cols"
>{{ field.default }}</textarea>
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<div class="option-fields-section wpuf-relative"> | ||
<p | ||
@click="showOptions = !showOptions" | ||
class="wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-justify-between wpuf-min-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-py-1 wpuf-px-2 wpuf-text-gray-900 !wpuf-shadow-sm placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6 wpuf-border !wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-max-w-full hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer" | ||
> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace paragraph with a button or ARIA attributes for improved accessibility.
While a clickable <p>
can be styled to resemble a button, consider using a <button>
or implementing ARIA attributes for accessibility compliance.
-<p
- @click="showOptions = !showOptions"
- class="..."
->
+</p>
+<button
+ type="button"
+ @click="showOptions = !showOptions"
+ class="..."
+ aria-haspopup="listbox"
+>
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
$post_form_page = 'wpuf-post-forms'; | ||
|
||
if ( strpos( get_current_screen()->id, $post_form_page ) === false ) { | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
wp_dequeue_style( 'wpuf-form-builder' ); | ||
if ( defined( 'WPUF_PRO_VERSION' ) && version_compare( WPUF_PRO_VERSION, '4.1', '<' ) ) { | ||
wp_dequeue_style( 'wpuf-form-builder-pro' ); | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
The current screen ID check should be exact to prevent unintended matches.
Based on the codebase analysis, the screen ID wpuf-post-forms
is used consistently throughout the codebase as an exact identifier for the post forms page. The current strpos
check could indeed lead to false positives with URLs like wpuf-post-forms-duplicate
or similar variations. This is particularly important because:
- The screen ID is used in menu registration:
add_submenu_page(..., 'wpuf-post-forms', ...)
- The ID is used for exact matching in other parts of the code:
return 'wpuf-post-forms' === $page ? true : false;
- All URL constructions in the codebase use the exact
wpuf-post-forms
value
The suggested refactor to use an exact match is correct:
- if ( strpos( get_current_screen()->id, $post_form_page ) === false ) {
+ if ( $post_form_page !== get_current_screen()->id ) {
🔗 Analysis chain
Validate the screen ID match.
The code checks for strpos( get_current_screen()->id, $post_form_page ) === false
. In some edge cases, partial matches (e.g., wpuf-post-forms-duplicate
) could mistakenly pass or fail. If you want an exact match, verify you do not inadvertently match sub-strings.
- if ( strpos( get_current_screen()->id, $post_form_page ) === false ) {
+ if ( $post_form_page !== get_current_screen()->id ) {
Let me gather more information about the screen ID usage in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of screen ID comparisons
rg "get_current_screen\(\)->id" -B 2 -A 2
# Search for definitions or usage of wpuf-post-forms
rg "wpuf-post-forms" -B 2 -A 2
# Look for any menu/page registration that might define these screen IDs
ast-grep --pattern 'add_menu_page($$$)'
ast-grep --pattern 'add_submenu_page($$$)'
Length of output: 17120
<div | ||
v-else | ||
class="wpuf-flex" | ||
> | ||
<div | ||
v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | ||
class="wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-mr-4"> | ||
<input | ||
type="checkbox" | ||
:value="val" | ||
:checked="is_selected(val)" | ||
:class="class_names('checkbox_btns')" | ||
class="!wpuf-mt-[.5px] wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600"> | ||
<label class="wpuf-ml-1 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve inline checkbox implementation for better maintainability.
Several issues need attention:
- Inconsistent method naming between
class_names
andbuilder_class_names
- Use of hardcoded !important modifier
- Missing key attribute in v-for directive
Apply these changes:
- v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options"
+ v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" :key="val"
- :class="class_names('checkbox_btns')"
- class="!wpuf-mt-[.5px] wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600">
+ :class="[
+ builder_class_names('checkbox_btns'),
+ 'wpuf-mt-0.5 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600'
+ ]">
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<div | |
v-else | |
class="wpuf-flex" | |
> | |
<div | |
v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | |
class="wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-mr-4"> | |
<input | |
type="checkbox" | |
:value="val" | |
:checked="is_selected(val)" | |
:class="class_names('checkbox_btns')" | |
class="!wpuf-mt-[.5px] wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600"> | |
<label class="wpuf-ml-1 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label> | |
</div> | |
</div> | |
<div | |
v-else | |
class="wpuf-flex" | |
> | |
<div | |
v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" :key="val" | |
class="wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-mr-4"> | |
<input | |
type="checkbox" | |
:value="val" | |
:checked="is_selected(val)" | |
:class="[ | |
builder_class_names('checkbox_btns'), | |
'wpuf-mt-0.5 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-text-indigo-600' | |
]"> | |
<label class="wpuf-ml-1 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label> | |
</div> | |
</div> |
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
|
||
<p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Potential XSS vulnerability in help text rendering.
Using v-html with potentially unsanitized content could expose the application to XSS attacks. Ensure that field.help
content is properly sanitized before rendering.
Consider one of these approaches:
- Sanitize the help text before assigning to field.help
- Use a dedicated HTML sanitizer library
- If HTML is not required, use standard text interpolation instead:
- <p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p>
+ <p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500">{{ field.help }}</p>
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-wpuf-forms.js (1)
122-122
: Spacing cleanup
Removing redundant spaces inconnectToSortable
enhances readability. Functionality remains intact.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js (1)
99-101
: Resetting panel sections
set_default_panel_sections
reverts to default. Makes it easier to refresh the UI if the user tries different filters or manipulations.Consider clarifying in code comments that this method reverts the user’s panel filters/sections to the plugin’s default structure.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js (1)
957-961
: Commented-out code
Leaving a clear comment for future reference or debugging might be beneficial if these lines are planned for re-introduction. Otherwise, consider removing if no longer needed.assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js (1)
957-961
: Commented-out resizing
If no longer needed, removing it would further reduce code clutter. Otherwise, leaving a clarifying comment is advisable.assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js (2)
1652-1692
: Optimize search performance with debouncingThe search functionality directly filters on every input change. Consider implementing debouncing to reduce unnecessary re-renders and improve performance, especially with a large number of fields.
+ data: function () { + return { + searchTimeout: null, + ...this.$data + } + }, watch: { searched_fields: function ( searchValue ) { + if (this.searchTimeout) { + clearTimeout(this.searchTimeout); + } + this.searchTimeout = setTimeout(() => { // Existing search logic + }, 300); } }
331-333
: Refactor code based on static analysis suggestionsSeveral code quality improvements can be made:
- Simplify boolean expressions
- Use optional chaining
- Remove unnecessary this aliasing
- return (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature) ? true : false; + return Boolean(this.field_settings[template]?.pro_feature); - if (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].is_full_width) { + if (this.field_settings[template]?.is_full_width) { - var self = this; - self.options.splice(index, 1); + this.options.splice(index, 1);Also applies to: 354-356, 362-364
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (1)
1047-1060
: Enhance search field accessibilityThe search implementation could benefit from additional accessibility attributes:
<input type="text" name="search" id="search" v-model="searched_fields" + role="searchbox" + aria-label="Search fields" + aria-describedby="search-description" class="!wpuf-border-none !wpuf-rounded-lg wpuf-block wpuf-min-w-0 wpuf-grow wpuf-px-4 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-base wpuf-text-gray-900 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 sm:wpuf-text-sm/6 !wpuf-shadow-none !wpuf-ring-transparent" placeholder="<?php esc_attr_e( 'Search Field', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>"> +<span id="search-description" class="wpuf-sr-only"> + <?php esc_html_e( 'Type to search available form fields', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?> +</span>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js
(13 hunks)admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-v4.1.php
(1 hunks)assets/css/frontend-forms.css
(2 hunks)assets/js-templates/form-components.php
(16 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
(12 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-wpuf-forms.js
(2 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js
(13 hunks)assets/less/frontend-forms.less
(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-v4.1.php
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/template.php
- assets/css/frontend-forms.css
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
[error] 1630-1630: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js
[error] 83-83: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (71)
assets/less/frontend-forms.less (2)
259-259
: LGTM: Editor wrap border removal.The removal of the border from
.wp-editor-wrap
creates a cleaner, more modern look for the editor interface.
2070-2074
: LGTM: Form preview dropzone styling.The dropzone styling uses semantic colors (green background and border) to provide clear visual feedback for drag and drop interactions.
A few observations about the implementation:
- The light green background (
#f0fdf4
) provides good contrast for content- The green border (
#4ade80
) clearly indicates the drop target area- The fixed height ensures consistent spacing in the layout
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-wpuf-forms.js (2)
111-111
: Typographical fix is properly applied
The correction from "destroy" ensures clarity in the code comments. No further changes needed.
113-113
: Selector refinement
Changing from a broad'.button'
class to'.wpuf-field-button'
helps precisely target the intended elements. Good improvement for clarity and maintainability.admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js (7)
1-14
: New component introduction
This newform-fields-v4-1
component structure is clear and follows Vue best practices. Good job organizing the data properties (searched_fields
,asset_url
) for easy reference.
30-49
: Draggable initialization
The approach of cleaning up previous jQuery UI draggable instances and re-initializing them is sound. Ensures the elements do not stack multiple draggable bindings.
52-55
: Toggle panel sections
panel_toggle
commits a Vuex mutation to handle panel visibility. Straightforward and maintainable approach for toggling UI states.
57-59
: Pro feature verification
Neat function to determine if a field is a pro feature. This improves clarity for end-users on restricted functionalities.
61-78
: Upsell workflow
alert_pro_feature
uses SweetAlert. The styling and logic look correct. Good reusability for product upsells.
80-92
: Validation workflow
alert_invalidate_msg
gracefully warns about invalid or incomplete fields. The approach is well-structured and user-friendly.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 83-83: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
104-145
: Responsive search & re-render
The watcher onsearched_fields
resets panel sections, re-initializes draggable, and filters the fields dynamically. This thoroughly addresses the real-time search use case.admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js (29)
44-47
: Conditional logic for older form panels
You’re correctly deciding which panel (older vs. new) to present based onis_older_form
andpost.post_type
. Great approach to unify new and legacy form builder experiences.
73-73
: Reset field editing
Resettingediting_field_id
to 0 is a good practice when switching to the “form-fields” or “form-fields-v4-1” panel, preventing stale references.
93-96
: Filtering for field settings
Lines 94-96 retrieve the relevant field fromform_fields
. The code is concise.
106-108
: Async delayed setting
UsingsetTimeout
to setediting_field_id
ensures the panel properly re-renders, preventing potential race conditions in Vue.
245-245
: Panel update after deletion
Shiftingstate.current_panel
toform-fields-v4-1
if it’s not an older form keeps the UI consistent with the newly introduced interface.
392-392
: Consistent panel selection for column field removal
Same logic for column fields: ensures the UI does not get stuck in the wrong panel.
396-404
: Panel section management
set_panel_sections
andset_default_panel_sections
provide seamless reconfigurations or resets of the form builder’s panel structure. This is flexible and easy to maintain.
423-428
: User interface states
Adding reactive data likeenableMultistep
,shortcodeCopied
,active_tab
, andactive_settings_tab
significantly expands the plugin’s user experience potential.
466-466
: Meta field key generation
Concise mapping for generating placeholders from the fieldname
. The approach is straightforward.
489-491
: Clipboard initialization
Binding a newClipboard
instance to.form-id
is a neat approach for easily copying shortcodes.
493-493
: Tooltip activation
Calling$(".form-id").tooltip();
ensures immediate help text for the user. Good call for usability.
495-500
: Conditional for post forms
Attaching click listeners only ifthis.is_post_form
is a practical approach, avoiding extraneous event binding on other form types.
501-517
: Copy success logic
This block updates tooltip text on copy and reverts it after a short interval. Great user feedback.
518-518
: Empty block
No functional difference introduced here. Good to see code cleanliness.
519-524
: Unload warning
Prompting the user upon unsaved changes is a great safeguard.
525-526
: Alternate nav tab binding
For non-post forms, separate tab logic is consistent with the overall approach.
528-529
: Secondary settings tab handling
These lines gather references to.tab-contents .group
for more targeted manipulations. Neat separation for bigger UIs.
531-532
: Default active tab
Selecting the first tab and showing the first group streamlines the initial user experience.
534-534
: Tab click binding
Reusingbind_tab_on_click
method keeps the code DRY.
536-536
: Reinitializing clipboard
Same logic for older forms. Ensures a consistent user experience.
537-540
: Tooltip text refactor
Appropriately sets the “Shortcode copied!” message. Clear user feedback.
542-542
: State toggling
shortcodeCopied
set to true at line 542. Straightforward.
544-549
: Tooltip revert timer
Setting a 1-second timeout is a standard approach, ensuring the success message remains visible briefly.
551-552
: Clipboard clearing
Finalizing the copy action so the user can repeat without leftover states.
553-553
: No further changes here
554-559
: Protect unsaved changes
As with older forms,window.onbeforeunload
warns of unsaved data. Good parity across code paths.
579-581
: Active settings tab
setActiveSettingsTab
quickly updatesactive_settings_tab
. Satisfies the user’s expectation of immediate reactivity.
597-598
: Panel fallback before save
Switching to either'form-fields'
or'form-fields-v4-1'
prior to saving the form is consistent with the rest of the flow.
609-609
: Immediate panel set
self.set_current_panel(panel)
ensures the correct panel is displayed post-save, clarifying the user’s next step.assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js (29)
44-47
: Adaptive panel handling
Same approach for older vs. new forms. This straightforward logic helps unify form builder usage.
73-73
: Reset field editing
As above, resettingediting_field_id
avoids references to a removed or changed field.
93-96
: Targeted field lookups
Retrieves the appropriate field for editing. The usage offilter
is concise.
106-108
: Async reactivity
ThesetTimeout
fix is repeated here for ensuring a clean re-render.
245-245
: Consistent panel post-deletion
Reverts to'form-fields-v4-1'
if it’s a newer form. Maintains a smooth user experience.
392-392
: Column field panel fix
Same approach ensures column field removal also respects the new panel logic.
396-404
: Panel sections
set_panel_sections
andset_default_panel_sections
mirror the logic used in the related script, ensuring consistent code in multiple areas.
423-428
: Extended data properties
The new data properties (shortcodeCopied
, etc.) reflect the plugin’s broader UI enhancements.
466-466
: Meta field placeholders
Generates a string of placeholders for meta fields. Light and efficient solution for shortcodes or templates.
489-491
: Clipboard constructor
Identical usage to the other file. Good for cross-consistency in the codebase.
493-493
: Tooltip
Same approach to activate the tooltip. Straightforward user experience improvement.
495-500
: Event binding for post form
Consistent check foris_post_form
ensures no overhead for pages that do not need it.
501-517
: Copy success feedback
Mirrors the logic of the other file. Great consistency across the builder.
518-518
: No functional change
519-524
: Unload safety
User is warned when leaving the page with unsaved changes, preventing data loss.
525-526
: Tab logic for advanced forms
Keeps the tab interactions coherent for non-post forms.
528-529
: Additional references
Grabbing.tab-contents .group
ensures dynamic updates.
531-532
: Defaulting to first tab
Helps new or returning users know where to start.
534-534
: Method reuse
bind_tab_on_click
is invoked again, continuing the DRY principle.
536-536
: Clipboard logic repeated
Idempotent code ensuring uniform copying functionality.
537-540
: Friendly message
Reminding users the copy was successful.
542-542
: Shortcode state
TogglingshortcodeCopied
is instant feedback.
544-549
: Timeout revert
Same approach ensures the message does not linger too long.
551-552
: Cleanup
Ensures subsequent copy actions remain accurate.
553-553
: No changes
554-559
: Window unload
Repeats the unsaved-changes confirmation. Good for user safety.
579-581
: Tab switching
setActiveSettingsTab
is a compact function. Perfectly suits the needed use case.
597-598
: Fallback to correct panel
Reaffirming the panel switch logic during form saving.
609-609
: Panel reset after save
Callingset_current_panel
is consistent with changes above.assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js (1)
258-260
: Verify the selector change impact on draggable functionalityThe selector for removing buttons from the stage has been changed from
.button.ui-draggable.ui-draggable-handle
to.wpuf-field-button
. While this aligns with the new styling approach, we should ensure this change doesn't break the draggable functionality in older templates.✅ Verification successful
The selector change is properly synchronized with draggable functionality
The code analysis shows that the selector change from
.button.ui-draggable.ui-draggable-handle
to.wpuf-field-button
is properly synchronized across the codebase:
- The new
.wpuf-field-button
class is consistently used in the draggable initialization code:var buttons = $(self.$el).find('.panel-form-field-buttons .wpuf-field-button'); buttons.draggable({ connectToSortable: '#form-preview-stage .wpuf-form, .wpuf-column-inner-fields .wpuf-column-fields-sortable-list', helper: 'clone', revert: 'invalid' });
- The class is properly defined in the templates:
class="wpuf-field-button wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-rounded-lg wpuf-border wpuf-border-gray-200 wpuf-bg-white wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-p-3 hover:wpuf-border-gray-300 hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer"
- The draggable functionality is properly maintained with proper cleanup and reinitialization:
if ($(this).draggable('instance')) { $(this).draggable('destroy'); }🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the old selector is still in use anywhere in the codebase rg -l "button.ui-draggable.ui-draggable-handle" # Check for any potential draggable initialization with the new selector rg -l "wpuf-field-button.*draggable"Length of output: 233
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the actual implementation and usage context rg "button.ui-draggable.ui-draggable-handle" -A 3 -B 3 # Check for any draggable initialization patterns rg "wpuf-field-button" -A 3 -B 3 # Look for jQuery draggable initialization rg "draggable\(" -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 26758
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (1)
87-91
: Well-implemented empty state UI patternThe empty state implementation follows good UX practices by:
- Providing clear visual feedback with an illustration
- Including descriptive text to guide users
- Maintaining visual hierarchy with appropriate typography
data: function () { | ||
return { | ||
showOptions: false, | ||
selectedOption: 'Select an option', | ||
}; | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility for custom dropdown implementation
The custom dropdown implementation should include ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation support for better accessibility. Consider adding:
aria-expanded
for dropdown staterole="listbox"
androle="option"
for semantic meaning- Keyboard event handlers for arrow keys, Enter, and Escape
data: function () {
return {
showOptions: false,
selectedOption: 'Select an option',
+ // Add aria attributes
+ ariaExpanded: false,
+ activeDescendant: null
};
},
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
src/css/admin/form-builder.css (1)
58-63
: Avoid overriding thebackground-color
withbackground
You have declaredbackground-color: #ffffff;
on line 60 and then overridden it withbackground: repeating-linear-gradient(...)
on line 62. If you intend to combine both, please consider leveraging layered background properties (e.g.,background-image
) to avoid potential conflicts.- background-color: #ffffff; - background: repeating-linear-gradient( -45deg, #dcfce7, #dcfce7 2px, #ffffff 2px, #ffffff 6px ); + background-color: #ffffff; + background-image: repeating-linear-gradient( + -45deg, + #dcfce7, + #dcfce7 2px, + #ffffff 2px, + #ffffff 6px + );🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 62-62: Unexpected shorthand property background after background-color
(lint/suspicious/noShorthandPropertyOverrides)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js (1)
80-93
: Use optional chaining to simplify the validator check
To cleanly check forvalidator
andvalidator.msg
, consider using optional chaining for improved readability.- if (validator && validator.msg) { + if (validator?.msg) {🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 83-83: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js (2)
355-358
: Replace ternary with direct boolean usage
Static analysis suggests removing unneeded boolean literals in conditional expressions, such as:return this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].is_full_width ? true : false;You may simplify to:
return !!(this.field_settings[template]?.is_full_width);🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
363-364
: Simplify conditional usage
Likewise, you can remove unnecessary boolean literals:- return ( field.recaptcha_type && 'invisible_recaptcha' === field.recaptcha_type ) ? true : false; + return field.recaptcha_type && field.recaptcha_type === 'invisible_recaptcha';🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (4)
89-90
: Fix duplicate message in blank state.The same message appears in both the heading and paragraph:
<h2>...<?php esc_html_e( 'Add fields and build your desired form', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?></h2> <p>...<?php esc_html_e( 'Add fields and build your desired form', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?></p>Consider using different, complementary messages to better guide the user.
743-778
: Enhance accessibility of checkbox fields.While the styling has been improved, consider these accessibility enhancements:
- Add
aria-label
oraria-labelledby
to improve screen reader support- Consider adding
aria-describedby
to link help text with inputsExample implementation:
<div class="wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center"> <input type="checkbox" :value="val" :checked="is_selected(val)" + :aria-label="label" + :aria-describedby="'help-' + field.id" :class="builder_class_names('checkbox')"> <label class="wpuf-ml-3 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label> </div> -<p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p> +<p v-if="field.help" :id="'help-' + field.id" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p>
1051-1057
: Enhance search field functionality.Consider these improvements to the search functionality:
- Add
aria-label
for accessibility- Add debounce to prevent excessive filtering
- Add loading state during filtering
Example implementation:
<input type="text" name="search" id="search" v-model="searched_fields" + aria-label="<?php esc_attr_e( 'Search form fields', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>" + @input="debounceSearch" class="!wpuf-border-none !wpuf-rounded-lg wpuf-block wpuf-min-w-0 wpuf-grow wpuf-px-4 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-base wpuf-text-gray-900 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 sm:wpuf-text-sm/6 !wpuf-shadow-none !wpuf-ring-transparent" placeholder="<?php esc_attr_e( 'Search Field', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>">
1047-1175
: Add JSDoc comments to Vue.js templates.Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose, props, and events of each template. This will improve maintainability and help other developers understand the components better.
Example:
/** * Form Fields Panel Component (v4.1) * * @template tmpl-wpuf-form-fields-v4-1 * @description Displays a searchable panel of form fields that can be dragged into the form builder. * * @property {Object[]} panel_sections - Sections of form fields * @property {Object} field_settings - Settings for each field type * @property {string} asset_url - Base URL for assets * * @fires add_form_field - When a field is added to the form * @fires alert_pro_feature - When a pro feature is clicked */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields/index.js
(1 hunks)assets/js-templates/form-components.php
(16 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
(13 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-wpuf-forms.js
(2 hunks)src/css/admin/form-builder.css
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-wpuf-forms.js
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/template.php
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/css/admin/form-builder.css
[error] 81-81: expected }
but instead the file ends
the file ends here
(parse)
[error] 62-62: Unexpected shorthand property background after background-color
(lint/suspicious/noShorthandPropertyOverrides)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
[error] 1630-1630: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js
[error] 83-83: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields/index.js (1)
26-26
: Include#form-preview-stage
in draggable connectionThis addition looks good and will allow draggable elements to be placed directly onto the
#form-preview-stage
.assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js (9)
188-270
: Consistent naming of new componentbuilder-stage-v4-1
The newbuilder-stage-v4-1
component replicates much of the logic frombuilder-stage
. Ensure all references to versioning or naming are consistent throughout the codebase to avoid confusion.
777-782
: [Duplicate Comment] Accessibility improvement needed for custom dropdown
This strongly resembles a comment from a prior review that recommended adding ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation.
805-806
: Well-structured mixing approach
Using bothwpuf_mixins.option_field_mixin
andwpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin
together in thefield-text
component is a good modular approach.
876-877
: Keep consistency in mixins usage
Similar tofield-text
, applyingwpuf_mixins.option_field_mixin
andwpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin
tofield-textarea
helps maintain consistency.
897-898
: Consistent multi-mixin usage
Applying both mixins tofield-visibility
aligns it with other fields, ensuring consistent data handling and reusability.
Line range hint
1028-1061
: Check for double-drag triggers in the column field
While the code setssortableTriggered
flags to avoid double drag triggers, ensure that edge cases with nested or quick drags do not still cause duplicates. Consider adding unit or integration tests covering drag-and-drop scenarios with multiple columns.
1115-1129
: Leverage dynamic classes
The computed propertiesaction_button_classes
andcolumnClasses
are straightforward, but ensure that the generated classes are consistently applied throughout the UI for a uniform look and feel.
1492-1492
: Great extension ofconnectToSortable
Updating the draggable selector to include#form-preview-stage
helps ensure form fields can be placed at the top level as well as in nested columns.
1548-1695
:form-fields-v4-1
panel addition
Introducing the new panel for a refined form-builder experience is well-organized. Good job ensuring partial code reuse from the existingform-fields
component while introducing the search functionality.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 1630-1630: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (1)
Line range hint
85-1481
: Overall implementation looks great!The changes successfully modernize the form builder interface with:
- Clean, modern UI using Tailwind CSS
- Improved user experience with better visual feedback
- Consistent styling across components
- Enhanced drag and drop functionality
The code is well-structured and maintainable. The suggested improvements are minor and can be addressed in follow-up updates.
#wpuf-form-builder .wpuf-fields { | ||
float: none; | ||
width: auto; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Close the file with a matching brace
Static analysis tools indicate that the file might be missing a closing brace. Double-check that all layers (@layer ... { ... }
) and any additional style blocks are syntactically closed.
...
81 }
+}
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 81-81: expected }
but instead the file ends
the file ends here
(parse)
delete_field: function(index) { | ||
var self = this; | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary aliasing of this
Using var self = this;
in the delete_field: function(index)
method is typically unnecessary if you adopt an arrow function in the promise callback (as arrow functions preserve the lexical this
).
delete_field: function(index) {
- var self = this;
(Swal.fire({
text: this.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg,
...
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
delete_field: function(index) { | |
var self = this; | |
delete_field: function(index) { | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (1)
Line range hint
1655-1655
: Remove console.log statementDebug logging should not be present in production code.
-console.log(this.field_settings[field].pro_feature);
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js (1)
777-782
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance accessibility for custom dropdown implementation
The custom dropdown implementation should include ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation support for better accessibility.
🧹 Nitpick comments (11)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js (3)
52-57
: Consider enhancing button accessibility.The button classes provide good visual feedback, but consider adding ARIA attributes and focus states for better accessibility.
computed: { action_button_classes: function() { - return 'wpuf-p-2 hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer hover:wpuf-text-white'; + return 'wpuf-p-2 hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer hover:wpuf-text-white focus:wpuf-outline-none focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-offset-2 focus:wpuf-ring-primary'; } },
95-125
: Refactor class management to reduce complexity and improve maintainability.While the implementation works, consider these improvements:
- The use of
!important
(!wpuf-border-gray-300) suggests potential CSS specificity issues.- Common classes between field types could be extracted to reduce duplication.
Consider extracting common classes and using a configuration object:
const COMMON_CLASSES = { base: 'wpuf-block wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-text-gray-900 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6', input: 'wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-border wpuf-border-gray-300' }; const FIELD_CLASSES = { upload_btn: `file-selector ${COMMON_CLASSES.base} wpuf-btn-secondary`, radio: 'wpuf-ml-3 wpuf-block wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-leading-6 wpuf-text-gray-900', // ... other field types }; builder_class_names: function(type_class) { const fieldClasses = FIELD_CLASSES[type_class] || `${COMMON_CLASSES.base} ${COMMON_CLASSES.input}`; return [ type_class, this.required_class(), 'wpuf_' + this.field.name + '_' + this.form_id, fieldClasses ]; }
312-312
: LGTM! Consider standardizing default prop values.The change correctly implements Vue.js best practices. For consistency, consider extracting these default values into a shared configuration.
const DEFAULT_PROP = () => ({ key: 'value' }); // Usage in components props: { field: { type: Object, default: DEFAULT_PROP }, option_field: { type: Object, default: DEFAULT_PROP }, editing_form_field: { type: Object, default: DEFAULT_PROP } }includes/Admin/Forms/Admin_Form_Builder.php (1)
266-271
: Consider pagination for scalability.The query retrieves all forms without pagination, which could impact performance if there are many forms.
Consider adding pagination or limiting the number of forms:
-$forms = get_posts([ - 'post_type' => $post_type, - 'post_status' => 'any', -]); +$forms = get_posts([ + 'post_type' => $post_type, + 'post_status' => 'any', + 'posts_per_page' => 10, + 'paged' => max(1, get_query_var('paged')), +]);wpuf-functions.php (2)
4819-4829
: Extract the version constant or inline documentation reference.The doc block references
@since WPUF_SINCE
. Typically, you want to replaceWPUF_SINCE
with an actual version constant or a valid version number (e.g.,4.1.0
) to accurately track when the function was introduced./** - * @since WPUF_SINCE + * @since 4.1.0 (Replace with the actual version) * * @return string */
4819-4829
: Ensure unit test coverage.This function is straightforward and not likely to fail under normal conditions, but a unit test that verifies the return string for different plugin states (e.g., when
WPUF_ASSET_URI
might differ) can be beneficial.Do you want me to provide a basic unit test snippet to confirm the correct return value under various plugin asset configuration scenarios?
admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js (1)
585-585
: Simplify boolean ternaryYou’re using a ternary that could be simplified:
- this.is_form_switcher = (this.is_form_switcher) ? false : true; + this.is_form_switcher = !this.is_form_switcher;🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 585-585: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js (3)
44-46
: Enhance state initialization with TypeScript interfacesThe new state properties lack type definitions which could lead to potential runtime errors. Consider adding TypeScript interfaces to improve type safety and code maintainability.
+ interface FormBuilderState { + is_older_form: boolean; + is_post_form: boolean; + // ... other state properties + } state: { - is_older_form: wpuf_form_builder.is_older_form, - is_post_form: wpuf_form_builder.is_older_form && wpuf_form_builder.post.post_type === 'wpuf_forms', + is_older_form: wpuf_form_builder.is_older_form as boolean, + is_post_form: (wpuf_form_builder.is_older_form && wpuf_form_builder.post.post_type === 'wpuf_forms') as boolean,
Line range hint
93-108
: Optimize field settings mutation with debouncingThe
open_field_settings
mutation uses a setTimeout which could cause unnecessary re-renders if triggered rapidly. Consider implementing debouncing to optimize performance.+ const debounce = (fn, delay) => { + let timeoutId; + return (...args) => { + clearTimeout(timeoutId); + timeoutId = setTimeout(() => fn.apply(this, args), delay); + }; + }; open_field_settings: function(state, field_id) { - setTimeout(function() { + const debouncedUpdate = debounce(function() { state.editing_field_id = field[0].id; - }, 400); + }, 400); + debouncedUpdate(); }
519-524
: Add confirmation dialog for unsaved changesThe
onbeforeunload
handler should provide a more descriptive message and consider checking for specific changes rather than a generic dirty flag.window.onbeforeunload = function() { - if (self.isDirty) { - return self.i18n.unsaved_changes; + if (self.hasUnsavedChanges()) { + return self.i18n.unsaved_changes_message || 'You have unsaved changes. Are you sure you want to leave?'; } }; + methods: { + hasUnsavedChanges: function() { + return this.isDirty && this.form_fields.some(field => field.isModified); + } + }assets/js-templates/form-components.php (1)
85-91
: Improve empty state messaging and accessibilityThe empty state messaging should be more descriptive and include proper ARIA attributes for screen readers.
-<div v-if="!form_fields.length" class="wpuf-flex wpuf-flex-col wpuf-items-center wpuf-justify-center wpuf-h-[80vh]"> +<div + v-if="!form_fields.length" + class="wpuf-flex wpuf-flex-col wpuf-items-center wpuf-justify-center wpuf-h-[80vh]" + role="status" + aria-live="polite" +> <img src="<?php echo WPUF_ASSET_URI . '/images/form-blank-state.svg'; ?>" + alt="Empty form illustration" + role="presentation" > - <h2 class="wpuf-text-lg wpuf-text-gray-800"><?php esc_html_e('Add fields and build your desired form', 'wp-user-frontend'); ?></h2> + <h2 class="wpuf-text-lg wpuf-text-gray-800"><?php esc_html_e('Start Building Your Form', 'wp-user-frontend'); ?></h2> - <p class="wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500"><?php esc_html_e('Add fields and build your desired form', 'wp-user-frontend'); ?></p> + <p class="wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500"><?php esc_html_e('Drag and drop fields from the right panel to start building your form', 'wp-user-frontend'); ?></p>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
assets/images/minus-circle-green.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
assets/images/plus-circle-green.svg
is excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-dropdown_field/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-section_break/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js
(13 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/form-field.js
(3 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/less/form-builder.less
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-v4.1.php
(1 hunks)assets/css/wpuf-form-builder.css
(1 hunks)assets/js-templates/form-components.php
(16 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
(14 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js
(5 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js
(13 hunks)includes/Admin/Forms/Admin_Form_Builder.php
(4 hunks)languages/wp-user-frontend.pot
(36 hunks)wpuf-functions.php
(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- assets/css/wpuf-form-builder.css
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage/index.js
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-dropdown_field/template.php
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-section_break/template.php
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/template.php
- admin/form-builder/assets/less/form-builder.less
- admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-v4.1.php
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/template.php
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/form-field.js
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js
[error] 83-83: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
[error] 1630-1630: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder.js
[error] 585-585: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js
[error] 585-585: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js
[error] 145-145: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 145-145: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 168-168: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 176-176: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 114-114: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
🔇 Additional comments (84)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js (2)
68-68
: LGTM! Important Vue.js best practice implemented.Changing the prop default from an object to a function prevents shared state between component instances. This is crucial for avoiding unintended side effects where multiple instances modify the same default object.
307-307
: LGTM! Consistent with Vue.js best practices.The change to a function-based default value prevents shared state between component instances.
includes/Admin/Forms/Admin_Form_Builder.php (5)
129-129
: LGTM! Added reCAPTCHA support.Added 'recaptcha' to the list of single objects, which aligns with the existing 'cloudflare_turnstile' integration.
281-281
: LGTM! Improved method documentation.The documentation update clearly indicates that these are WordPress i18n translatable strings.
273-277
: Verify template file existence.The code conditionally includes different template files based on version, but doesn't verify if they exist.
Let's verify the template files:
✅ Verification successful
Template files verified and accessible
Both template files exist and are readable:
admin/form-builder/views/form-builder.php
admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-v4.1.php
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if both template files exist echo "Checking form builder template files:" ls -l admin/form-builder/views/form-builder.php admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-v4.1.php 2>/dev/null || echo "One or more template files missing"Length of output: 370
166-174
: Verify the version-specific feature flags.The new localization keys support version-specific features:
is_older_form
checks for Pro version < 4.1is_pro_active
determines if Pro is active- Added paths for loading assets from both free and pro versions
Let's verify the version checks are used consistently:
✅ Verification successful
Version-specific feature flags are properly implemented and consistent
The version checks and feature flags are implemented consistently across the codebase:
- Version comparisons uniformly check for WPUF Pro < 4.1
- The
is_older_form
flag is properly utilized in the form builder UI- Asset paths are correctly configured with appropriate constant checks
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for version comparison usage to ensure consistent version checking echo "Searching for WPUF_PRO_VERSION comparisons:" rg "version_compare\s*\(\s*WPUF_PRO_VERSION" -t php echo -e "\nSearching for is_older_form usage in JS:" rg "is_older_form" -g "*.{js,vue}"Length of output: 3061
51-51
: Verify the usage of the new action hook.A new action hook
wpuf_admin_form_builder_view
has been added alongside the existingwpuf_admin_form_builder
hook. Both hooks trigger the same callback method.Let's check if both hooks are necessary:
✅ Verification successful
The new action hook implementation is correct
The hook
wpuf_admin_form_builder_view
is part of a form builder revamp and is properly implemented with version-based conditional logic to maintain backward compatibility with WPUF Pro versions below 4.1.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of both hooks to understand if they serve different purposes echo "Searching for wpuf_admin_form_builder hook usage:" rg "do_action\s*\(\s*['\"]wpuf_admin_form_builder['\"]" -t php echo -e "\nSearching for wpuf_admin_form_builder_view hook usage:" rg "do_action\s*\(\s*['\"]wpuf_admin_form_builder_view['\"]" -t phpLength of output: 552
Script:
#!/bin/bash # View the content of post-form.php to understand the context of both hooks echo "Content of includes/Admin/views/post-form.php:" cat includes/Admin/views/post-form.phpLength of output: 410
wpuf-functions.php (1)
4831-4840
: Valid approach to detect the pro class.This check using
class_exists( 'WP_User_Frontend_Pro' )
is a good approach to verify if the commercial version is active. A fallback or more robust detection (like checking constants) might be worth considering if you foresee multiple Pro classes or differences in naming.languages/wp-user-frontend.pot (37)
1-11
: No Functional Impact on Code ExecutionThese lines update header metadata (year, creation date, revision date), which doesn't affect the plugin's logic. The changes appear consistent with updated release info.
Line range hint
139-151
: Added or modified text strings are well-formedThe new strings and modifications follow consistent structure, appear grammatically correct, and do not pose i18n concerns.
167-171
: Localized text updatesThese placeholder strings for form import functionality remain consistent with the plugin’s pattern. No issues.
Line range hint
175-240
: Metadata and additional placeholdersAll placeholders and updated lines are properly formatted. No conflict with default text domain usage.
243-267
: Concise improvements on message stringsThe new placeholders for "Show values," "Sync values," "Label," etc. are properly introduced. No concerns.
275-282
: Addition of more strings referencing advanced fieldsStrings like "Clear Selection" and "Available in PRO version" align with typical premium gating. Good approach.
285-293
: No i18n or PII issuesText updates for subscription plan references do not expose personal data.
300-318
: Search features and form idea submission placeholdersProper English usage, consistent instructions for UI. No further changes needed.
320-365
: Additional form editor instructionsThese lines introduce new text for "Insert Photo," "Invisible reCaptcha," "Enable Multistep," etc. Implementation matches expected user guidance.
369-388
: New blocks for UI feedback (Preview, Save Form)Well-structured additions. Localization is consistent across the plugin.
Line range hint
468-559
: Payment configuration text changesNo syntax or localizability issues. The gating for "Enable Payments" lines is correct.
Line range hint
617-637
: User permissions & unsubscribed user messagesStrings for user permissions and unsubscribed states appear straightforward and help user clarity.
Line range hint
716-879
: New placeholders for name, email, and instructionsThese additions are carefully structured. No code logic concerns since POT changes have no direct functional effect.
978-1038
: Enhanced error & success message stringsLocalization-friendly approach for error dialogues.
Line range hint
1042-1162
: Broader plugin coverage with new linesAdds more messages for reCaptcha, image uploads, subscription details, plus general instructions. Everything looks correct.
Line range hint
1376-1434
: Extended placeholders for form componentsEnsures users see relevant instructions for textareas and advanced fields.
Line range hint
1455-1485
: Capturing extended info for captcha & turnstileNicely integrated new references. No translation or variable collisions found.
Line range hint
1620-1639
: Payment cancel & summary linesStructure follows previous patterns, with placeholders for dynamic data. Good approach.
Line range hint
1770-1809
: Post Expiration & advanced subscription linesIntegrates new lines seamlessly. No red flags spotted.
2241-2245
: Added welcome message & instructionsReference to a specialized user journey. Maintains uniform plugin tone.
2517-2538
: New labeling for post form settingsNo errors or style conflicts. This is consistent with other form references.
2543-2559
: Ensuring form must have title/body fieldsBusiness logic string influences front-end validation instructions. Looks fine.
2563-2609
: Pro gating message expansionsAccurate gating instructions for Pro features. Seamless user experience.
Line range hint
2613-2669
: User guidance for advanced custom fieldsText instructs user about ACF compatibility. Aligned well with the plugin's extended logic.
2670-2683
: Integration request stringsStraightforward placeholders for custom integration requests.
305-310
: Minor additions for template selectionNo content or structural issues found.
3067-3093
: Modal instructions for new form creationConfirming i18n placeholders appear correct.
Line range hint
3176-3213
: Advanced fields referencesThe expansions for “Google Map,” "Action Hook," "Address Field," etc. are consistent with prior text.
Line range hint
4353-4482
: Cloudflare turnstile integration textAdded lines supporting new captcha method. Polished approach with well-formed instructions.
4490-4493
: Column number, spacing infoComplements the new column field features. All good.
4553-4561
: Section break referencesNo concerns. The lines remain consistent with existing structure.
4606-4614
: URL field enhancements"Open in new window" text updated for clarity. Good job.
4619-4631
: Phone field & embed placeholdersNo functional or typographical problems.
4635-4656
: Pro upgrade referencesKeeps marketing and gating consistent. No duplication.
4661-4679
: Multi-step, math captcha, QR code coverageNo concerns. Straight to the point.
6109-6110
: New placeholders for marking items featuredImplementation matches the plugin’s existing approach to labeling.
7892-7947
: Enhanced select messages (accessibility)Introduces clarity for screen readers. Good for user experience.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js (15)
1-3
: Clear self-documentation in the header commentIndicates purpose of the new Vue component for the sidebar form fields.
4-6
: Component registrationDefines the 'form-fields-v4-1' component, no issues with naming.
7-8
: Mixins usage is correctSuccessfully merges wpuf_form_builder_mixins and add_form_field functionalities.
9-13
: Data properties initializationThe
searched_fields
andis_pro_active
properties are clearly set, indicating user’s search input and pro status.
16-28
: Computed properties referencing Vuex
panel_sections
,field_settings
,form_fields
are well structured. No duplication found.
30-50
: Draggable initialization in mounted hookDraggable is re-bound after destroying previous instances. This prevents potential double-binding issues. Good job.
52-55
: Method: panel_toggleCommits a Vuex mutation to toggle panel sections. Straightforward, no concerns.
57-59
: Method: is_pro_featureChecks if a field is gated for pro. Implementation is direct and consistent with field settings.
61-78
: Method: alert_pro_featureProvides a sweet alert if a field is pro-only. Clear logic, no problem.
80-93
: Method: alert_invalidate_msgDisplays warnings if the field_settings validator has a message. The approach is robust.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 83-83: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
95-97
: Method: get_invalidate_btn_classSimple method returning CSS classes for the validator button.
99-101
: Method: set_default_panel_sectionsCommits mutation to restore panel sections to default. Good separation of concerns.
103-115
: Method: get_icon_urlProvides correct icon path depending on pro status or normal. The debug log is helpful for verifying.
117-121
: Method: is_pro_previewPrevents preview unless pro is active. Straightforward gating logic.
124-165
: Watch: searched_fieldsResets the default panel sections upon text changes, re-initializes drag behavior, then filters fields. Implementation is robust and user-friendly.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js (11)
1-3
: Component definition & template referenceRegisters 'builder-stage-v4-1' correctly, referencing the correct template ID.
4-5
: Mixins for builder_stage & add_form_fieldAppropriate usage merges relevant functionalities.
6-28
: Computed properties referencing Vuex storeRetrieves
form_fields
,field_settings
, and others. Implementation is consistent with the overall store.
30-82
: mounted hook – jQuery UI sortable setupSort functionality is properly configured. The logic for detecting drag from panel vs stage is well-handled with
source
.
84-88
: Method: open_field_settingsCommits Vuex mutation to open field settings. This matches the typical structure in WP User Frontend.
89-111
: Method: clone_fieldClones existing field if not single-instance. Thorough check with simple user feedback using SweetAlert. Works well.
113-132
: Method: delete_fieldPrompts the user for confirmation before removing. Proper use of SweetAlert for user safety.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 114-114: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits
this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
134-142
: Method: delete_hidden_fieldIterates known fields for matching ID and calls delete_field. Straightforward approach.
144-146
: Method: is_pro_featureChecks
pro_feature
property fromfield_settings
. Good gating.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 145-145: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 145-145: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
148-165
: Method: is_template_available, is_full_width, is_invisible, get_field_nameEnsures correct field availability checks and UI decisions. Implementation looks consistent.
167-183
: No extra logic concernsThe file ends with consistent usage of these methods. Everything is well-coded.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 168-168: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 176-176: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/form-builder.js (13)
44-46
: New state properties: is_older_form, is_post_formThese boolean flags help differentiate older vs. newer form logic. Great approach for backward compatibility.
47-47
: current_panel initializationSwitches between 'form-fields' and 'form-fields-v4-1' based on form type. Nicely decoupled.
73-73
: Reset editing_field_id for new panel namesEnsures a clean state when toggling the main panel. Zero side effects seen.
Line range hint
93-108
: open_field_settings mutationBrief wait with setTimeout to ensure the correct field is assigned after switching panels. No concurrency issues.
245-245
: delete_form_field_element mutationResets current panel to 'form-fields' or 'form-fields-v4-1' after deletion. A well-defined fallback.
392-392
: delete_column_field_element mutationSimilarly toggles the panel upon deleting a column field. Maintains state consistency.
396-399
: Mutation: set_panel_sectionsUpdates state with new panel sections, possibly used by the new v4-1 panel. Straightforward approach.
401-404
: Mutation: set_default_panel_sectionsResets panel sections to defaults from global object. Smooth addition.
423-424
: New data flags: isDirtyHelps track unsaved changes. Implementation aligns with typical form builder logic.
425-426
: New data flags: enableMultistep, shortcodeCopiedUsed to manage multi-step toggle and user feedback for copied shortcodes. No concerns.
427-428
: Active Tab management
active_tab
,active_settings_tab
track user’s current view. Straightforward.
466-466
: Computed property: meta_field_keyFilters form fields to retrieve meta fields. Implementation is correct, no performance issues.
600-601
: Set current panel to fallback before form submissionSwitching panel ensures correct state prior to saving.
var clipboard = new window.Clipboard('.form-id'); | ||
var settings_tabs = $( '#wpuf-form-builder-settings-tabs .nav-tab' ); | ||
var self = this; | ||
|
||
// secondary settings tabs and their contents | ||
var settings_tabs = $('#wpuf-form-builder-settings .nav-tab'), | ||
settings_tab_contents = $('#wpuf-form-builder-settings .tab-contents .group'); | ||
$(".form-id").tooltip(); | ||
|
||
settings_tabs.first().addClass('nav-tab-active'); | ||
settings_tab_contents.first().addClass('active'); | ||
if ( this.is_post_form ) { | ||
// add a click listener to each settings_tab | ||
settings_tabs.each( function () { | ||
$( this ).bind( 'click', self.setActiveSettingsTab ); | ||
} ); | ||
|
||
clipboard.on( 'success', function ( e ) { | ||
// Show copied tooltip | ||
$( e.trigger ) | ||
.attr( 'data-original-title', 'Shortcode copied!' ) | ||
.tooltip( 'show' ); | ||
|
||
self.shortcodeCopied = true; | ||
|
||
// Reset the copied tooltip | ||
setTimeout( function () { | ||
$( e.trigger ).tooltip( 'hide' ) | ||
.attr( 'data-original-title', self.i18n.copy_shortcode ); | ||
self.shortcodeCopied = false; | ||
}, 1000 ); | ||
|
||
e.clearSelection(); | ||
} ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve clipboard initialization and error handling
The clipboard initialization lacks error handling and cleanup. Consider adding error handling and proper cleanup in the component's beforeDestroy
lifecycle hook.
mounted: function() {
- var clipboard = new window.Clipboard('.form-id');
+ try {
+ this.clipboard = new window.Clipboard('.form-id');
+ this.initializeClipboard();
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to initialize clipboard:', error);
+ }
},
+ beforeDestroy: function() {
+ if (this.clipboard) {
+ this.clipboard.destroy();
+ }
+ },
+ methods: {
+ initializeClipboard: function() {
+ if (!this.clipboard) return;
+ this.clipboard.on('success', (e) => {
// ... existing clipboard success handler
+ }).on('error', (e) => {
+ console.error('Action:', e.action);
+ console.error('Trigger:', e.trigger);
+ });
+ }
+ }
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
methods: { | ||
open_field_settings: function(field_id) { | ||
this.$store.commit('open_field_settings', field_id); | ||
}, | ||
|
||
clone_field: function(field_id, index) { | ||
var payload = { | ||
field_id: field_id, | ||
index: index, | ||
new_id: this.get_random_id() | ||
}; | ||
|
||
// single instance checking | ||
var field = _.find(this.$store.state.form_fields, function (item) { | ||
return parseInt(item.id) === parseInt(payload.field_id); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
// check if these are already inserted | ||
if ( this.isSingleInstance( field.template ) && this.containsField( field.template ) ) { | ||
Swal.fire({ | ||
title: "Oops...", | ||
text: "You already have this field in the form" | ||
}); | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
this.$store.commit('clone_form_field_element', payload); | ||
}, | ||
|
||
delete_field: function(index) { | ||
var self = this; | ||
|
||
(Swal.fire({ | ||
text: self.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg, | ||
icon: 'warning', | ||
showCancelButton: true, | ||
confirmButtonColor: '#d54e21', | ||
confirmButtonText: self.i18n.yes_delete_it, | ||
cancelButtonText: self.i18n.no_cancel_it, | ||
customClass: { | ||
confirmButton: 'btn btn-success', | ||
cancelButton: 'btn btn-danger', | ||
} | ||
})).then((result) => { | ||
if (result.isConfirmed) { | ||
self.$store.commit('delete_form_field_element', index); | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
}, | ||
|
||
delete_hidden_field: function (field_id) { | ||
var i = 0; | ||
|
||
for (i = 0; i < this.form_fields.length; i++) { | ||
if (parseInt(field_id) === parseInt(this.form_fields[i].id)) { | ||
this.delete_field(i); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
|
||
is_pro_feature: function (template) { | ||
return ( this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature ) ? true : false; | ||
}, | ||
|
||
is_template_available: function (field) { | ||
var template = field.template; | ||
|
||
if (this.field_settings[template]) { | ||
if (this.is_pro_feature(template)) { | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return true; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// for example see 'mixin_builder_stage' mixin's 'is_taxonomy_template_available' method | ||
if (_.isFunction(this['is_' + template + '_template_available'])) { | ||
return this['is_' + template + '_template_available'].call(this, field); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return false; | ||
}, | ||
|
||
is_full_width: function (template) { | ||
if (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].is_full_width) { | ||
return true; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return false; | ||
}, | ||
|
||
is_invisible: function (field) { | ||
return ( field.recaptcha_type && 'invisible_recaptcha' === field.recaptcha_type ) ? true : false; | ||
}, | ||
|
||
get_field_name: function (template) { | ||
return this.field_settings[template].title; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance component reusability and reduce code duplication
The builder-stage-v4-1
component largely duplicates code from the original builder-stage
component. Consider extracting common functionality into a mixin or base component.
+ const builderStageMixin = {
+ computed: {
+ form_fields() { ... },
+ field_settings() { ... },
+ hidden_fields() { ... },
+ editing_form_id() { ... },
+ pro_link() { ... }
+ },
+ methods: {
+ open_field_settings() { ... },
+ clone_field() { ... },
+ delete_field() { ... }
+ }
+ };
Vue.component('builder-stage-v4-1', {
template: '#tmpl-wpuf-builder-stage-v4-1',
- // Duplicate code
+ mixins: [builderStageMixin],
// Component-specific code
});
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
<span | ||
class="field-helper-text wpuf-ml-2" | ||
:data-placement="placement" | ||
data-toggle="tooltip" | ||
data-container="body"> | ||
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="18" height="18" fill="none"> | ||
<path d="M9.833 12.333H9V9h-.833M9 5.667h.008M16.5 9a7.5 7.5 0 1 1-15 0 7.5 7.5 0 1 1 15 0z" | ||
stroke="#9CA3AF" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"></path> | ||
</svg> | ||
</span> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance tooltip accessibility
The help text tooltip implementation should include proper ARIA attributes and keyboard interaction support.
<span
class="field-helper-text wpuf-ml-2"
:data-placement="placement"
- data-toggle="tooltip"
+ role="tooltip"
+ :aria-label="text"
+ tabindex="0"
+ @keydown.enter="toggleTooltip"
+ @keydown.space="toggleTooltip"
data-container="body">
<svg
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
width="18"
height="18"
fill="none"
+ role="img"
+ aria-hidden="true"
>
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (12)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js (2)
59-62
: Consider extracting CSS classes to a configuration object.While the implementation works, consider moving these Tailwind CSS classes to a configuration object for better maintainability and reusability across components.
+ const ACTION_BUTTON_CLASSES = 'wpuf-p-2 hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer hover:wpuf-text-white'; computed: { action_button_classes: function() { - return 'wpuf-p-2 hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer hover:wpuf-text-white'; + return ACTION_BUTTON_CLASSES; } },
Line range hint
1-1
: Consider gradual migration from jQuery to pure Vue.js.While the current implementation works, the mixture of jQuery and Vue.js could lead to maintenance challenges. Consider planning a gradual migration to pure Vue.js for better maintainability and performance.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/add-form-field.js (1)
49-53
: Simplify the code using optional chaining.The function can be simplified for better readability.
Apply this diff to improve the code:
- is_pro_preview: function (template) { - var is_pro_active = wpuf_form_builder.is_pro_active === '1'; - - return (!is_pro_active && this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature); - }, + is_pro_preview: function (template) { + return wpuf_form_builder.is_pro_active !== '1' && this.field_settings[template]?.pro_feature; + },admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js (1)
103-113
: Simplify the code using early return pattern.The method can be simplified for better readability.
Apply this diff to improve the code:
- get_icon_url: function (field) { - if (!this.field_settings[field].icon) { - return ''; - } - - if (this.is_pro_active === '1' && this.field_settings[field].pro_feature) { - return wpuf_form_builder.pro_asset_url + '/images/' + this.field_settings[field].icon + '.svg'; - } else { - return wpuf_form_builder.asset_url + '/images/' + this.field_settings[field].icon + '.svg'; - } - }, + get_icon_url: function (field) { + const icon = this.field_settings[field]?.icon; + if (!icon) { + return ''; + } + const baseUrl = (this.is_pro_active === '1' && this.field_settings[field].pro_feature) + ? wpuf_form_builder.pro_asset_url + : wpuf_form_builder.asset_url; + return `${baseUrl}/images/${icon}.svg`; + },admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js (2)
144-146
: Simplify boolean expression.The method uses an unnecessary ternary operator and could benefit from optional chaining.
Apply this diff to improve the code:
- is_pro_feature: function (template) { - return (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature) ? true : false; - }, + is_pro_feature: function (template) { + return Boolean(this.field_settings[template]?.pro_feature); + },🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 145-145: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 145-145: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
175-177
: Simplify boolean expression.The method uses an unnecessary ternary operator.
Apply this diff to improve the code:
- is_invisible: function (field) { - return ( field.recaptcha_type && 'invisible_recaptcha' === field.recaptcha_type ) ? true : false; - }, + is_invisible: function (field) { + return field.recaptcha_type === 'invisible_recaptcha'; + },🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 176-176: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/template.php (1)
1-126
: Extract repeated class combinations into computed properties.The template has several repeated class combinations that could be extracted into computed properties for better maintainability.
Add these computed properties to the component:
computed: { columnWrapperClasses() { return 'wpuf-flex-1 wpuf-min-w-0 wpuf-min-h-full wpuf-column-inner-fields'; }, columnContainerClasses() { return 'wpuf-border wpuf-border-dashed wpuf-border-green-400 wpuf-bg-green-50 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-p-1'; }, columnItemClasses() { return '!wpuf-m-0 !wpuf-p-0 wpuf-group/column-inner hover:wpuf-bg-green-50 wpuf-transition wpuf-duration-150 wpuf-ease-out column-field-items wpuf-el wpuf-rounded-t-md'; } }Then update the template:
- class="wpuf-flex-1 wpuf-min-w-0 wpuf-min-h-full wpuf-column-inner-fields"> + :class="columnWrapperClasses"> - class="wpuf-border wpuf-border-dashed wpuf-border-green-400 wpuf-bg-green-50 wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-p-1"> + :class="columnContainerClasses"> - class="!wpuf-m-0 !wpuf-p-0 wpuf-group/column-inner hover:wpuf-bg-green-50 wpuf-transition wpuf-duration-150 wpuf-ease-out column-field-items wpuf-el wpuf-rounded-t-md" + :class="[columnItemClasses, ...]"admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/index.js (1)
121-130
: Simplify array generation using Array.from.The computed property can be simplified using Array.from for better readability.
Apply this diff to improve the code:
- columnClasses: function() { - var columns_count = parseInt( this.field.columns ); - var columns = []; - - for (var i = 1; i <= columns_count; i++) { - columns.push('column-' + i); - } - - return columns; - } + columnClasses: function() { + const columns_count = parseInt(this.field.columns); + return Array.from( + { length: columns_count }, + (_, i) => `column-${i + 1}` + ); + }admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/template.php (3)
2-6
: Differentiate heading and description text for better UXThe same text is used for both the heading and description, which doesn't provide additional value to users.
<div v-if="!form_fields.length" class="wpuf-flex wpuf-flex-col wpuf-items-center wpuf-justify-center wpuf-h-[80vh]"> <img src="<?php echo WPUF_ASSET_URI . '/images/form-blank-state.svg'; ?>" alt=""> <h2 class="wpuf-text-lg wpuf-text-gray-800"><?php esc_html_e( 'Add fields and build your desired form', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?></h2> - <p class="wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500"><?php esc_html_e( 'Add fields and build your desired form', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?></p> + <p class="wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500"><?php esc_html_e( 'Drag and drop fields from the right sidebar to start building your form', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?></p> </div>
8-120
: Enhance accessibility for form field controlsWhile the implementation is solid, the form field controls could benefit from improved accessibility.
<div v-if="field.input_type !== 'column_field'" :class="parseInt(editing_form_id) === parseInt(field.id) ? 'wpuf-bg-green-50 wpuf-border-green-400' : 'wpuf-border-transparent'" - class="wpuf-flex wpuf-justify-between wpuf-p-4 wpuf-rounded-t-md wpuf-border-t wpuf-border-r wpuf-border-l wpuf-border-dashed group-hover:wpuf-border-green-400 group-hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer"> + class="wpuf-flex wpuf-justify-between wpuf-p-4 wpuf-rounded-t-md wpuf-border-t wpuf-border-r wpuf-border-l wpuf-border-dashed group-hover:wpuf-border-green-400 group-hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer" + role="group" + :aria-label="field.label + ' field controls'"> <!-- Control buttons --> <span :class="action_button_classes" - @click="open_field_settings(field.id)"> + @click="open_field_settings(field.id)" + role="button" + tabindex="0" + :aria-label="'Edit ' + field.label" + @keydown.enter="open_field_settings(field.id)"> <i class="fa fa-pencil"></i> Edit </span>
125-193
: Extract control buttons into a reusable componentThe control buttons logic is duplicated between regular form fields and hidden fields. Consider extracting this into a reusable component to improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.
Create a new component
field-control-buttons.php
:<template> <div class="field-buttons" :class="buttonClasses"> <div class="wpuf-flex wpuf-justify-around wpuf-text-green-200"> <template v-if="!is_failed_to_validate(field.template)"> <span v-if="showMove" :class="action_button_classes"> <i class="fa fa-arrows move wpuf-pr-2 wpuf-rounded-l-md hover:!wpuf-cursor-move wpuf-border-r wpuf-border-green-200"></i> </span> <span :class="action_button_classes" @click="$emit('edit', field.id)"> <i class="fa fa-pencil"></i> Edit </span> <span :class="action_button_classes" @click="$emit('clone', field.id, index)"> <i class="fa fa-clone"></i> Copy </span> </template> <!-- ... rest of the control buttons ... --> </div> </div> </template> <script> export default { props: { field: Object, index: Number, showMove: { type: Boolean, default: true }, buttonClasses: Object } } </script>Then use it in both places:
- <div class="field-buttons">...</div> + <field-control-buttons + :field="field" + :index="index" + :show-move="true" + :button-classes="buttonClasses" + @edit="open_field_settings" + @clone="clone_field" + @delete="delete_field" + />assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js (1)
376-377
: Document mixin usage and purposeMultiple components have been updated to include
form_field_mixin
, but its purpose and provided functionality are not documented.Add JSDoc comments to explain the mixin's purpose and usage:
/** * Provides common form field functionality * @mixin * @description This mixin provides common methods and computed properties for form fields * @example * // In a component: * export default { * mixins: [wpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin], * // ... component logic * } */ const form_field_mixin = { // ... mixin implementation };Also consider adding inline documentation where the mixin is used:
Vue.component('field-checkbox', { template: '#tmpl-wpuf-field-checkbox', mixins: [ wpuf_mixins.option_field_mixin, + // Provides common form field validation and styling wpuf_mixins.form_field_mixin ],
Also applies to: 476-477, 805-806, 876-877, 897-898
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/index.js
(3 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/add-form-field.js
(1 hunks)assets/js-templates/form-components.php
(16 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
(14 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js
(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
[error] 1630-1630: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js
[error] 145-145: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 145-145: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 168-168: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 176-176: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 114-114: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-fields-v4-1/index.js
[error] 83-83: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js (4)
51-57
: LGTM! Well-implemented pro feature check.The
is_pro_preview
method effectively determines if a field template is a pro feature while the pro version is inactive.
73-75
: LGTM! Important Vue.js best practice implementation.Changing the prop's default value to a factory function prevents shared state issues between component instances, which is crucial for maintaining proper component isolation.
312-314
: LGTM! Consistent prop initialization.Good practice using a factory function for the prop's default value, maintaining consistency with Vue.js best practices.
317-319
: LGTM! Proper prop initialization.Correctly implements Vue.js best practice for prop default values using a factory function.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/add-form-field.js (1)
57-59
: LGTM!The computed property correctly returns Tailwind CSS classes for consistent button styling across the form builder.
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/index.js (1)
117-119
: LGTM!The computed property correctly returns Tailwind CSS classes for consistent button styling across the form builder.
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (1)
1043-1171
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance accessibility for form field search and buttons
The new form fields panel needs improved keyboard navigation and screen reader support.
<div class="wpuf-px-6"> <div class="wpuf-flex wpuf-rounded-lg wpuf-bg-white wpuf-outline wpuf--outline-1 wpuf--outline-offset-1 wpuf-outline-gray-300 wpuf-border wpuf-border-gray-200 wpuf-shadow"> <input type="text" name="search" id="search" v-model="searched_fields" + aria-label="Search form fields" + role="searchbox" class="!wpuf-border-none !wpuf-rounded-lg wpuf-block wpuf-min-w-0 wpuf-grow wpuf-px-4 wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-base wpuf-text-gray-900 placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 sm:wpuf-text-sm/6 !wpuf-shadow-none !wpuf-ring-transparent" placeholder="<?php esc_attr_e( 'Search Field', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>"> <div class="wpuf-flex wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-pr-1.5"> <span class="wpuf-inline-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-rounded wpuf-px-1 wpuf-font-sans wpuf-text-xs wpuf-text-gray-400"> <svg v-if="!searched_fields" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" fill="none" viewBox="0 0 24 24" stroke-width="1.5" stroke="currentColor" + role="img" + aria-label="Search" class="wpuf-size-5 hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer wpuf-transition-all"> <path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" d="m21 21-5.197-5.197m0 0A7.5 7.5 0 1 0 5.196 5.196a7.5 7.5 0 0 0 10.607 10.607Z" /> </svg> <svg v-if="searched_fields" @click="searched_fields = ''" + @keydown.enter="searched_fields = ''" + tabindex="0" + role="button" + aria-label="Clear search" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 20 20" fill="currentColor" class="wpuf-size-5 hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer wpuf-transition-all"> <path d="M6.28 5.22a.75.75 0 0 0-1.06 1.06L8.94 10l-3.72 3.72a.75.75 0 1 0 1.06 1.06L10 11.06l3.72 3.72a.75.75 0 1 0 1.06-1.06L11.06 10l3.72-3.72a.75.75 0 0 0-1.06-1.06L10 8.94 6.28 5.22Z" /> </svg> </span> </div> </div> <!-- Field buttons --> <div v-else :key="field" :data-form-field="field" data-source="panel" @click="add_form_field(field)" + @keydown.enter="add_form_field(field)" + tabindex="0" + role="button" + :aria-label="'Add ' + field_settings[field].title + ' field'" class="wpuf-field-button wpuf-relative wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-rounded-lg wpuf-border wpuf-border-gray-200 wpuf-bg-white wpuf-shadow-sm wpuf-p-3 hover:wpuf-border-gray-300 hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer"> <!-- ... button content ... --> </div>Likely invalid or redundant comment.
builder_class_names: function(type_class) { | ||
var commonClasses = ''; | ||
|
||
switch (type_class) { | ||
case 'upload_btn': | ||
commonClasses = 'file-selector wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-btn-secondary'; | ||
break; | ||
|
||
case 'radio': | ||
commonClasses = 'wpuf-ml-3 wpuf-block wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-leading-6 wpuf-text-gray-900'; | ||
break; | ||
|
||
case 'checkbox': | ||
commonClasses = 'wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 !wpuf-mt-0.5 checked:focus:wpuf-bg-primary checked:hover:wpuf-bg-primary checked:wpuf-bg-primary before:!wpuf-content-none'; | ||
break; | ||
|
||
case 'dropdown': | ||
commonClasses = 'wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-min-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6 wpuf-border !wpuf-border-gray-300'; | ||
break; | ||
|
||
default: | ||
commonClasses = 'wpuf-block wpuf-min-w-full wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 !wpuf-shadow-sm placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6 wpuf-border !wpuf-border-gray-300 wpuf-max-w-full'; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return [ | ||
type_class, | ||
this.required_class(), | ||
'wpuf_' + this.field.name + '_' + this.form_id, | ||
commonClasses | ||
]; | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor class generation for better maintainability.
The current implementation could be improved in several ways:
- Extract CSS classes to a configuration object
- Add input validation
- Remove duplicate classes
+ const FIELD_CLASSES = {
+ base: 'wpuf-block wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm',
+ common: 'placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6',
+ upload_btn: 'file-selector wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-btn-secondary',
+ radio: 'wpuf-ml-3 wpuf-block wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-leading-6 wpuf-text-gray-900',
+ checkbox: 'wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 !wpuf-mt-0.5',
+ dropdown: 'wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-min-w-full'
+ };
builder_class_names: function(type_class) {
+ if (!type_class || typeof type_class !== 'string') {
+ console.warn('Invalid type_class provided to builder_class_names');
+ return [];
+ }
+
var commonClasses = '';
- switch (type_class) {
- case 'upload_btn':
- commonClasses = 'file-selector wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-btn-secondary';
- break;
- // ... other cases
+ commonClasses = FIELD_CLASSES[type_class] || FIELD_CLASSES.base;
+ commonClasses += ' ' + FIELD_CLASSES.common;
return [
type_class,
this.required_class(),
'wpuf_' + this.field.name + '_' + this.form_id,
commonClasses
];
},
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
searched_fields: function ( searchValue ) { | ||
var self = this; | ||
|
||
this.set_default_panel_sections(); | ||
|
||
// Bind jquery ui draggable. But first destroy any previous binding | ||
Vue.nextTick(function () { | ||
var buttons = $(self.$el).find('.panel-form-field-buttons .wpuf-field-button'); | ||
|
||
buttons.each(function () { | ||
|
||
if ($(this).draggable('instance')) { | ||
$(this).draggable('destroy'); | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
|
||
buttons.draggable({ | ||
connectToSortable: '#form-preview-stage, #form-preview-stage .wpuf-form, .wpuf-column-inner-fields .wpuf-column-fields-sortable-list', | ||
helper: 'clone', | ||
revert: 'invalid', | ||
cancel: '.button-faded', | ||
}).disableSelection(); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
if (this.searched_fields === '') { | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
const matchedFields = Object.keys( self.field_settings ).filter( key => | ||
self.field_settings[key].title.toLowerCase().includes( searchValue.toLowerCase() ) | ||
); | ||
|
||
const updatedStructure = self.panel_sections.map(section => ({ | ||
id: section.id, | ||
title: section.title, | ||
show: section.show, | ||
fields: section.fields.filter(field => matchedFields.includes(field)) | ||
})); | ||
|
||
this.$store.commit('set_panel_sections', updatedStructure); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor to reduce code duplication and improve readability.
The watcher duplicates draggable initialization code from the mounted hook and could benefit from simpler filtering logic.
- Extract draggable initialization to a separate method:
methods: {
initializeDraggable: function() {
const buttons = $(this.$el).find('.panel-form-field-buttons .wpuf-field-button');
buttons.each(function() {
if ($(this).draggable('instance')) {
$(this).draggable('destroy');
}
});
buttons.draggable({
connectToSortable: '#form-preview-stage, #form-preview-stage .wpuf-form, .wpuf-column-inner-fields .wpuf-column-fields-sortable-list',
helper: 'clone',
revert: 'invalid',
cancel: '.button-faded',
}).disableSelection();
}
}
- Simplify the watcher:
- searched_fields: function ( searchValue ) {
- var self = this;
-
- this.set_default_panel_sections();
-
- // Bind jquery ui draggable. But first destroy any previous binding
- Vue.nextTick(function () {
- var buttons = $(self.$el).find('.panel-form-field-buttons .wpuf-field-button');
-
- buttons.each(function () {
-
- if ($(this).draggable('instance')) {
- $(this).draggable('destroy');
- }
- });
-
- buttons.draggable({
- connectToSortable: '#form-preview-stage, #form-preview-stage .wpuf-form, .wpuf-column-inner-fields .wpuf-column-fields-sortable-list',
- helper: 'clone',
- revert: 'invalid',
- cancel: '.button-faded',
- }).disableSelection();
- });
-
- if (this.searched_fields === '') {
- return;
- }
-
- const matchedFields = Object.keys( self.field_settings ).filter( key =>
- self.field_settings[key].title.toLowerCase().includes( searchValue.toLowerCase() )
- );
-
- const updatedStructure = self.panel_sections.map(section => ({
- id: section.id,
- title: section.title,
- show: section.show,
- fields: section.fields.filter(field => matchedFields.includes(field))
- }));
-
- this.$store.commit('set_panel_sections', updatedStructure);
- }
+ searched_fields: function(searchValue) {
+ this.set_default_panel_sections();
+
+ Vue.nextTick(() => {
+ this.initializeDraggable();
+ });
+
+ if (!searchValue) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ const searchLower = searchValue.toLowerCase();
+ const matchedFields = new Set(
+ Object.entries(this.field_settings)
+ .filter(([_, field]) => field.title.toLowerCase().includes(searchLower))
+ .map(([key]) => key)
+ );
+
+ const updatedStructure = this.panel_sections.map(section => ({
+ ...section,
+ fields: section.fields.filter(field => matchedFields.has(field))
+ }));
+
+ this.$store.commit('set_panel_sections', updatedStructure);
+ }
methods: { | ||
open_field_settings: function(field_id) { | ||
this.$store.commit('open_field_settings', field_id); | ||
}, | ||
|
||
clone_field: function(field_id, index) { | ||
var payload = { | ||
field_id: field_id, | ||
index: index, | ||
new_id: this.get_random_id() | ||
}; | ||
|
||
// single instance checking | ||
var field = _.find(this.$store.state.form_fields, function (item) { | ||
return parseInt(item.id) === parseInt(payload.field_id); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
// check if these are already inserted | ||
if ( this.isSingleInstance( field.template ) && this.containsField( field.template ) ) { | ||
Swal.fire({ | ||
title: "Oops...", | ||
text: "You already have this field in the form" | ||
}); | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
this.$store.commit('clone_form_field_element', payload); | ||
}, | ||
|
||
delete_field: function(index) { | ||
var self = this; | ||
|
||
(Swal.fire({ | ||
text: self.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg, | ||
icon: 'warning', | ||
showCancelButton: true, | ||
confirmButtonColor: '#d54e21', | ||
confirmButtonText: self.i18n.yes_delete_it, | ||
cancelButtonText: self.i18n.no_cancel_it, | ||
customClass: { | ||
confirmButton: 'btn btn-success', | ||
cancelButton: 'btn btn-danger', | ||
} | ||
})).then((result) => { | ||
if (result.isConfirmed) { | ||
self.$store.commit('delete_form_field_element', index); | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
}, | ||
|
||
delete_hidden_field: function (field_id) { | ||
var i = 0; | ||
|
||
for (i = 0; i < this.form_fields.length; i++) { | ||
if (parseInt(field_id) === parseInt(this.form_fields[i].id)) { | ||
this.delete_field(i); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
|
||
is_pro_feature: function (template) { | ||
return ( this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature ) ? true : false; | ||
}, | ||
|
||
is_template_available: function (field) { | ||
var template = field.template; | ||
|
||
if (this.field_settings[template]) { | ||
if (this.is_pro_preview(template)) { | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return true; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// for example see 'mixin_builder_stage' mixin's 'is_taxonomy_template_available' method | ||
if (_.isFunction(this['is_' + template + '_template_available'])) { | ||
return this['is_' + template + '_template_available'].call(this, field); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return false; | ||
}, | ||
|
||
is_full_width: function (template) { | ||
if (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].is_full_width) { | ||
return true; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return false; | ||
}, | ||
|
||
is_invisible: function (field) { | ||
return ( field.recaptcha_type && 'invisible_recaptcha' === field.recaptcha_type ) ? true : false; | ||
}, | ||
|
||
get_field_name: function (template) { | ||
return this.field_settings[template].title; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize code quality and reduce duplication
The new builder-stage-v4-1
component has several code quality issues and duplicates much of the original builder-stage
component's logic.
- Remove unnecessary
this
aliasing:
- var self = this;
(Swal.fire({
- text: self.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg,
+ text: this.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg,
icon: 'warning',
showCancelButton: true,
confirmButtonColor: '#d54e21',
- confirmButtonText: self.i18n.yes_delete_it,
- cancelButtonText: self.i18n.no_cancel_it,
+ confirmButtonText: this.i18n.yes_delete_it,
+ cancelButtonText: this.i18n.no_cancel_it,
customClass: {
confirmButton: 'btn btn-success',
cancelButton: 'btn btn-danger',
}
})).then((result) => {
if (result.isConfirmed) {
- self.$store.commit('delete_form_field_element', index);
+ this.$store.commit('delete_form_field_element', index);
}
});
- Simplify boolean expressions:
- return (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature) ? true : false;
+ return !!(this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature);
- Extract common logic into a mixin:
// form-builder-stage-mixin.js
export const formBuilderStageMixin = {
methods: {
open_field_settings(field_id) {
this.$store.commit('open_field_settings', field_id);
},
clone_field(field_id, index) {
// ... common clone logic
},
delete_field(index) {
// ... common delete logic
}
// ... other common methods
}
};
// In component
{
mixins: [formBuilderStageMixin],
// Component-specific logic
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js (1)
101-131
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRefactor class generation for better maintainability.
The current implementation could benefit from the previously suggested refactoring approach to improve maintainability and reduce duplication.
See the previous review comment for the detailed refactoring suggestion that extracts CSS classes to a configuration object.
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (1)
1454-1463
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance tooltip accessibility.
The help text tooltip implementation should include proper ARIA attributes and keyboard interaction support.
🧹 Nitpick comments (12)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js (1)
52-56
: Consider using strict boolean comparison.The string comparison with '1' could be replaced with a more explicit boolean check.
- var is_pro_active = wpuf_form_builder.is_pro_active === '1'; + var is_pro_active = Boolean(parseInt(wpuf_form_builder.is_pro_active, 10));assets/js-templates/form-components.php (1)
918-918
: Standardize help text styling across components.The help text styling is inconsistent across different form field components. Some use
<span>
while others use<p>
, and the classes are not consistently applied.Standardize the help text implementation:
-<span v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-help" v-html="field.help"></span> +<p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p>Also applies to: 938-938, 951-951, 974-974, 1183-1183, 1252-1252, 1267-1267, 1281-1281, 1318-1318, 1403-1403, 1416-1416, 1436-1436, 1449-1449
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js (2)
188-370
: Consider extracting common logic to reduce duplicationThe
builder-stage-v4-1
component largely duplicates code from the originalbuilder-stage
component. Consider extracting shared functionality into a mixin or base component to improve maintainability.+ const builderStageMixin = { + computed: { + form_fields() { ... }, + field_settings() { ... }, + hidden_fields() { ... }, + editing_form_id() { ... }, + pro_link() { ... } + }, + methods: { + open_field_settings() { ... }, + clone_field() { ... }, + delete_field() { ... } + } + }; Vue.component('builder-stage-v4-1', { template: '#tmpl-wpuf-builder-stage-v4-1', + mixins: [builderStageMixin], // Component-specific code });🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits
this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
332-332
: Simplify boolean expressionsThe ternary operators for boolean conversion can be simplified.
- return (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature) ? true : false; + return !!(this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature); - return (field.recaptcha_type && 'invisible_recaptcha' === field.recaptcha_type) ? true : false; + return !!(field.recaptcha_type && 'invisible_recaptcha' === field.recaptcha_type);Also applies to: 363-363
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js (4)
1-4
: Consider local component registration and SFC pattern.The current implementation uses global component registration and external templates. Consider:
- Using local component registration for better tree-shaking
- Moving to Single File Components (SFC) pattern for better maintainability
- Documenting mixin dependencies to prevent naming conflicts
21-23
: Fix naming inconsistency in computed property.The computed property
editing_form_id
accessesediting_field_id
from the store. Align the naming to prevent confusion.- editing_form_id: function () { - return this.$store.state.editing_field_id; + editing_field_id: function () { + return this.$store.state.editing_field_id;
144-146
: Optimize boolean expressions and method implementations.Several methods can be simplified:
is_pro_feature: function (template) { - return ( this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature ) ? true : false; + return Boolean(this.field_settings[template]?.pro_feature); }, is_full_width: function (template) { - if (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].is_full_width) { - return true; - } - return false; + return Boolean(this.field_settings[template]?.is_full_width); }, is_invisible: function (field) { - return ( field.recaptcha_type && 'invisible_recaptcha' === field.recaptcha_type ) ? true : false; + return field.recaptcha_type === 'invisible_recaptcha'; },Also applies to: 167-173, 175-177
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 145-145: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 145-145: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
113-132
: Simplify delete_field method using arrow function.The method uses unnecessary
this
aliasing. Modern JavaScript allows cleaner implementation:delete_field: function(index) { - var self = this; - (Swal.fire({ - text: self.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg, + text: this.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg, icon: 'warning', showCancelButton: true, confirmButtonColor: '#d54e21', - confirmButtonText: self.i18n.yes_delete_it, - cancelButtonText: self.i18n.no_cancel_it, + confirmButtonText: this.i18n.yes_delete_it, + cancelButtonText: this.i18n.no_cancel_it, customClass: { confirmButton: 'btn btn-success', cancelButton: 'btn btn-danger', } - })).then((result) => { + })).then(result => { if (result.isConfirmed) { - self.$store.commit('delete_form_field_element', index); + this.$store.commit('delete_form_field_element', index); } }); },🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 114-114: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits
this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-option-data/template.php (4)
2-6
: Maintain consistency in help-text component usage.The help text component is used with different prop patterns across the file. Consider standardizing the usage:
-<help-text v-if="option_field.help_text" :text="option_field.help_text"></help-text> +<help-text + v-if="option_field.help_text" + :text="option_field.help_text" +></help-text>
7-22
: Enhance accessibility for checkbox controls.Consider adding
aria-label
attributes and improving keyboard navigation:<input type="checkbox" v-model="show_value" - class="wpuf-input-checkbox"> + class="wpuf-input-checkbox" + :aria-label="<?php esc_attr_e( 'Show values', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>" +>
118-124
: Enhance keyboard accessibility for clear selection button.Add keyboard interaction attributes and role:
<a v-if="!option_field.is_multiple && selected" class="wpuf-inline-flex wpuf-items-center wpuf-gap-x-2 wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-px-3 wpuf-py-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-700 hover:wpuf-text-gray-700 hover:wpuf-bg-gray-50 wpuf-ring-1 wpuf-ring-inset wpuf-ring-gray-300 wpuf-mt-4" href="#clear" + role="button" + tabindex="0" + @keyup.enter="clear_selection" @click.prevent="clear_selection">
1-124
: Consider extracting utility classes into component classes.The extensive use of utility classes, while flexible, may lead to maintenance challenges. Consider:
- Creating reusable component classes for common patterns
- Using CSS modules or scoped styles for better encapsulation
- Implementing a design system for consistent styling
This would improve maintainability and reduce duplication across templates.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-option-data/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-radio_field/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/form-field.js
(3 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/less/form-builder.less
(1 hunks)assets/css/wpuf-form-builder.css
(1 hunks)assets/js-templates/form-components.php
(16 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
(14 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js
(5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-radio_field/template.php
- assets/css/wpuf-form-builder.css
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/form-field.js
- admin/form-builder/assets/less/form-builder.less
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/template.php
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
[error] 1630-1630: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/builder-stage-v4-1/index.js
[error] 145-145: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 145-145: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 168-168: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 176-176: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 114-114: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js (4)
60-62
: LGTM! Well-structured Tailwind classes.The computed property provides a clean way to manage button styling using Tailwind CSS classes.
74-74
: LGTM! Follows Vue.js best practices.Using a factory function for the prop default prevents shared state between component instances, which is crucial for avoiding unintended mutations.
89-89
: LGTM! Fixed syntax error.The missing closing brace has been added, resolving the syntax error.
313-318
: LGTM! Consistent prop defaults implementation.The prop defaults are correctly implemented using factory functions, maintaining consistency with Vue.js best practices across the codebase.
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js (7)
41-41
: LGTM: Updated selector aligns with new UI structure
376-377
: LGTM: Enhanced component with form field mixinGood addition of the form field mixin to share common functionality.
476-477
: LGTM: Enhanced component with form field mixinGood addition of the form field mixin to share common functionality.
610-610
: LGTM: Enhanced component with form field mixinGood addition of the form field mixin while maintaining existing functionality.
2063-2066
: LGTM: Improved tooltip configurationEnhanced tooltip initialization with dynamic title and auto placement.
1548-1706
: LGTM: Well-implemented search functionalityThe new form-fields-v4-1 component adds search capabilities with proper cleanup and reinitialization of jQuery UI bindings.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 1630-1630: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
301-301
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRemove unnecessary
this
aliasingThe
var self = this
pattern is unnecessary when using arrow functions as they preserve the lexical scope.- var self = this; - (Swal.fire({ - text: self.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg, + text: this.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg, icon: 'warning', showCancelButton: true, confirmButtonColor: '#d54e21', - confirmButtonText: self.i18n.yes_delete_it, - cancelButtonText: self.i18n.no_cancel_it, + confirmButtonText: this.i18n.yes_delete_it, + cancelButtonText: this.i18n.no_cancel_it,Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits
this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
<span :class="action_button_classes"> | ||
<i | ||
class="fa fa-arrows move wpuf-pr-2 wpuf-rounded-l-md hover:!wpuf-cursor-move wpuf-border-r wpuf-border-green-200"></i> | ||
</span> | ||
<span | ||
:class="action_button_classes" | ||
@click="open_field_settings(field.id)"> | ||
<i | ||
class="fa fa-pencil"></i> | ||
Edit | ||
</span> | ||
<span | ||
:class="action_button_classes" | ||
@click="clone_field(field.id, index)"> | ||
<i | ||
class="fa fa-clone"></i> | ||
Copy | ||
</span> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility of action buttons.
The action buttons lack proper ARIA labels and keyboard interaction support.
Add appropriate ARIA attributes and keyboard support:
<span :class="action_button_classes">
<i
- class="fa fa-arrows move wpuf-pr-2 wpuf-rounded-l-md hover:!wpuf-cursor-move wpuf-border-r wpuf-border-green-200"></i>
+ class="fa fa-arrows move wpuf-pr-2 wpuf-rounded-l-md hover:!wpuf-cursor-move wpuf-border-r wpuf-border-green-200"
+ role="button"
+ tabindex="0"
+ aria-label="Move field"
+ @keydown.enter="handleMove"
+ @keydown.space="handleMove"></i>
</span>
<span
:class="action_button_classes"
+ role="button"
+ tabindex="0"
@click="open_field_settings(field.id)">
<i
class="fa fa-pencil"></i>
Edit
</span>
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
// bind jquery ui sortable | ||
$('#form-preview-stage, #form-preview-stage .wpuf-form.sortable-list').sortable({ | ||
placeholder: 'form-preview-stage-dropzone', | ||
items: '.field-items', | ||
handle: '.field-buttons .move', | ||
scroll: true, | ||
over: function() { | ||
in_column_field = false; | ||
|
||
// if the field drop in column field, then stop field rendering in the builder stage | ||
$(".wpuf-column-inner-fields" ).on( "drop", function(event) { | ||
var targetColumn = event.currentTarget.classList, | ||
isColumnExist = $.inArray(".wpuf-column-inner-fields", targetColumn); | ||
|
||
if ( isColumnExist ) { | ||
in_column_field = true; | ||
} | ||
} ); | ||
}, | ||
update: function (e, ui) { | ||
var item = ui.item[0], | ||
data = item.dataset, | ||
source = data.source, | ||
toIndex = parseInt($(ui.item).index()), | ||
payload = { | ||
toIndex: toIndex | ||
}; | ||
|
||
if ('panel' === source) { | ||
// add new form element | ||
self.$store.state.index_to_insert = parseInt(toIndex); | ||
|
||
if ( ! in_column_field ) { | ||
var field_template = ui.item[0].dataset.formField; | ||
self.add_form_field(field_template); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// remove button from stage | ||
$(this).find('.wpuf-field-button').remove(); | ||
|
||
} else if ('stage' === source) { | ||
payload.fromIndex = parseInt(data.index); | ||
|
||
self.$store.commit('swap_form_field_elements', payload); | ||
} | ||
|
||
} | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve jQuery UI integration with Vue.
Several concerns in the sortable implementation:
- Direct DOM manipulation with jQuery might conflict with Vue's virtual DOM
- Direct store state mutation (
self.$store.state.index_to_insert
) violates Vuex patterns - Complex column field logic could be extracted into a separate method
Consider these improvements:
- Use Vue refs instead of jQuery selectors
- Move state mutations to Vuex mutations
- Extract column field logic to a dedicated method
Example refactor for the state mutation:
- self.$store.state.index_to_insert = parseInt(toIndex);
+ self.$store.commit('set_insert_index', parseInt(toIndex));
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
<?php esc_attr_e( 'Label', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?> | ||
<help-text text="<?php esc_attr_e( 'Do not use & or other special character for option label', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>"></help-text> | ||
</th> | ||
<th | ||
v-if="show_value" | ||
class="wpuf-font-normal" | ||
scope="col"> | ||
<?php esc_attr_e( 'Value', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?> | ||
</th> | ||
<th scope="col"></th> | ||
<th scope="col"></th> | ||
</tr> | ||
</thead> | ||
<tbody> | ||
<tr | ||
v-for="(option, index) in options" | ||
:key="option.id" | ||
:data-index="index"> | ||
<td class="wpuf-flex"> | ||
<div class="selector "> | ||
<input | ||
v-if="option_field.is_multiple" | ||
type="checkbox" | ||
:value="option.value" | ||
v-model="selected" | ||
class="wpuf-input-checkbox" | ||
> | ||
<input | ||
v-else | ||
type="radio" | ||
:value="option.value" | ||
v-model="selected" | ||
:class="builder_class_names('radio')" | ||
> | ||
</div> | ||
<div class="sort-handler"> | ||
<i class="fa fa-bars"></i> | ||
</div> | ||
</td> | ||
<td> | ||
<input | ||
type="checkbox" | ||
v-model="show_value" | ||
/><?php esc_attr_e( 'Show values', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?> | ||
</label> | ||
</li> | ||
<li> | ||
<label> | ||
:class="builder_class_names('text')" | ||
type="text" | ||
v-model="option.label" | ||
@input="set_option_label(index, option.label)"> | ||
</td> | ||
<td | ||
v-if="show_value" | ||
class="wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500"> | ||
<input | ||
type="checkbox" | ||
v-model="sync_value" | ||
/><?php esc_attr_e( 'Sync values', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?> | ||
</label> | ||
<help-text placement="left" text="<?php esc_attr_e( 'When enabled, option values will update according to their labels.', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>" /> | ||
</li> | ||
</ul> | ||
:class="builder_class_names('text')" | ||
type="text" | ||
v-model="option.value"> | ||
</td> | ||
<td class="wpuf-ml-2 wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center"> | ||
<div | ||
class="action-buttons hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer wpuf-mt-1" | ||
@click="delete_option(index)"> | ||
<svg | ||
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" | ||
fill="none" | ||
viewBox="0 0 24 24" | ||
stroke-width="1.5" | ||
stroke="currentColor" | ||
class="wpuf-size-6 wpuf-border wpuf-rounded-2xl wpuf-border-gray-400 hover:wpuf-border-primary wpuf-p-1"> | ||
<path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" d="M5 12h14" /> | ||
</svg> | ||
</div> | ||
<div | ||
v-if="index === options.length - 1" | ||
class="plus-buttons hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer !wpuf-border-0 wpuf-mt-1" | ||
@click="add_option"> | ||
<svg | ||
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" | ||
fill="none" | ||
viewBox="0 0 24 24" | ||
stroke-width="1.5" | ||
stroke="currentColor" | ||
class="wpuf-ml-1 wpuf-size-6 wpuf-border wpuf-rounded-2xl wpuf-border-gray-400 wpuf-p-1"> | ||
<path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" d="M12 4.5v15m7.5-7.5h-15" /> | ||
</svg> | ||
</div> | ||
</td> | ||
</tr> | ||
</tbody> | ||
</table> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve table accessibility and security.
Several improvements are recommended:
- Add ARIA labels and roles to enhance table accessibility
- Implement input sanitization for option labels
- Consider extracting repeated utility classes into reusable CSS classes
Apply these changes:
-<table class="wpuf-w-full wpuf-text-left">
+<table
+ class="wpuf-w-full wpuf-text-left"
+ role="grid"
+ aria-label="<?php esc_attr_e( 'Field options', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>"
+>
<input
:class="builder_class_names('text')"
type="text"
v-model="option.label"
- @input="set_option_label(index, option.label)">
+ @input="set_option_label(index, $event.target.value)"
+ :aria-label="<?php esc_attr_e( 'Option label', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>"
+>
Also, consider extracting repeated utility classes like wpuf-border wpuf-rounded-2xl wpuf-border-gray-400
into a reusable CSS class.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<div class="option-field-option-chooser wpuf-mx-auto wpuf-flow-root wpuf-overflow-hidden"> | |
<table class="wpuf-w-full wpuf-text-left"> | |
<thead class="wpuf-bg-white"> | |
<tr> | |
<th scope="col"></th> | |
<th scope="col" class="wpuf-flex wpuf-font-normal"> | |
<?php esc_attr_e( 'Label', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?> | |
<help-text text="<?php esc_attr_e( 'Do not use & or other special character for option label', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>"></help-text> | |
</th> | |
<th | |
v-if="show_value" | |
class="wpuf-font-normal" | |
scope="col"> | |
<?php esc_attr_e( 'Value', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?> | |
</th> | |
<th scope="col"></th> | |
<th scope="col"></th> | |
</tr> | |
</thead> | |
<tbody> | |
<tr | |
v-for="(option, index) in options" | |
:key="option.id" | |
:data-index="index"> | |
<td class="wpuf-flex"> | |
<div class="selector "> | |
<input | |
v-if="option_field.is_multiple" | |
type="checkbox" | |
:value="option.value" | |
v-model="selected" | |
class="wpuf-input-checkbox" | |
> | |
<input | |
v-else | |
type="radio" | |
:value="option.value" | |
v-model="selected" | |
:class="builder_class_names('radio')" | |
> | |
</div> | |
<div class="sort-handler"> | |
<i class="fa fa-bars"></i> | |
</div> | |
</td> | |
<td> | |
<input | |
type="checkbox" | |
v-model="show_value" | |
/><?php esc_attr_e( 'Show values', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?> | |
</label> | |
</li> | |
<li> | |
<label> | |
:class="builder_class_names('text')" | |
type="text" | |
v-model="option.label" | |
@input="set_option_label(index, option.label)"> | |
</td> | |
<td | |
v-if="show_value" | |
class="wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500"> | |
<input | |
type="checkbox" | |
v-model="sync_value" | |
/><?php esc_attr_e( 'Sync values', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?> | |
</label> | |
<help-text placement="left" text="<?php esc_attr_e( 'When enabled, option values will update according to their labels.', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>" /> | |
</li> | |
</ul> | |
:class="builder_class_names('text')" | |
type="text" | |
v-model="option.value"> | |
</td> | |
<td class="wpuf-ml-2 wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center"> | |
<div | |
class="action-buttons hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer wpuf-mt-1" | |
@click="delete_option(index)"> | |
<svg | |
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" | |
fill="none" | |
viewBox="0 0 24 24" | |
stroke-width="1.5" | |
stroke="currentColor" | |
class="wpuf-size-6 wpuf-border wpuf-rounded-2xl wpuf-border-gray-400 hover:wpuf-border-primary wpuf-p-1"> | |
<path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" d="M5 12h14" /> | |
</svg> | |
</div> | |
<div | |
v-if="index === options.length - 1" | |
class="plus-buttons hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer !wpuf-border-0 wpuf-mt-1" | |
@click="add_option"> | |
<svg | |
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" | |
fill="none" | |
viewBox="0 0 24 24" | |
stroke-width="1.5" | |
stroke="currentColor" | |
class="wpuf-ml-1 wpuf-size-6 wpuf-border wpuf-rounded-2xl wpuf-border-gray-400 wpuf-p-1"> | |
<path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" d="M12 4.5v15m7.5-7.5h-15" /> | |
</svg> | |
</div> | |
</td> | |
</tr> | |
</tbody> | |
</table> | |
<div class="option-field-option-chooser wpuf-mx-auto wpuf-flow-root wpuf-overflow-hidden"> | |
<table | |
class="wpuf-w-full wpuf-text-left" | |
role="grid" | |
aria-label="<?php esc_attr_e( 'Field options', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>" | |
> | |
<thead class="wpuf-bg-white"> | |
<tr> | |
<th scope="col"></th> | |
<th scope="col" class="wpuf-flex wpuf-font-normal"> | |
<?php esc_attr_e( 'Label', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?> | |
<help-text text="<?php esc_attr_e( 'Do not use & or other special character for option label', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>"></help-text> | |
</th> | |
<th | |
v-if="show_value" | |
class="wpuf-font-normal" | |
scope="col"> | |
<?php esc_attr_e( 'Value', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?> | |
</th> | |
<th scope="col"></th> | |
<th scope="col"></th> | |
</tr> | |
</thead> | |
<tbody> | |
<tr | |
v-for="(option, index) in options" | |
:key="option.id" | |
:data-index="index"> | |
<td class="wpuf-flex"> | |
<div class="selector "> | |
<input | |
v-if="option_field.is_multiple" | |
type="checkbox" | |
:value="option.value" | |
v-model="selected" | |
class="wpuf-input-checkbox" | |
> | |
<input | |
v-else | |
type="radio" | |
:value="option.value" | |
v-model="selected" | |
:class="builder_class_names('radio')" | |
> | |
</div> | |
<div class="sort-handler"> | |
<i class="fa fa-bars"></i> | |
</div> | |
</td> | |
<td> | |
<input | |
:class="builder_class_names('text')" | |
type="text" | |
v-model="option.label" | |
@input="set_option_label(index, $event.target.value)" | |
:aria-label="<?php esc_attr_e( 'Option label', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?>" | |
> | |
</td> | |
<td | |
v-if="show_value" | |
class="wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500"> | |
<input | |
:class="builder_class_names('text')" | |
type="text" | |
v-model="option.value"> | |
</td> | |
<td class="wpuf-ml-2 wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center"> | |
<div | |
class="action-buttons hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer wpuf-mt-1" | |
@click="delete_option(index)"> | |
<svg | |
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" | |
fill="none" | |
viewBox="0 0 24 24" | |
stroke-width="1.5" | |
stroke="currentColor" | |
class="wpuf-size-6 wpuf-border wpuf-rounded-2xl wpuf-border-gray-400 hover:wpuf-border-primary wpuf-p-1"> | |
<path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" d="M5 12h14" /> | |
</svg> | |
</div> | |
<div | |
v-if="index === options.length - 1" | |
class="plus-buttons hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer !wpuf-border-0 wpuf-mt-1" | |
@click="add_option"> | |
<svg | |
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" | |
fill="none" | |
viewBox="0 0 24 24" | |
stroke-width="1.5" | |
stroke="currentColor" | |
class="wpuf-ml-1 wpuf-size-6 wpuf-border wpuf-rounded-2xl wpuf-border-gray-400 wpuf-p-1"> | |
<path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" d="M12 4.5v15m7.5-7.5h-15" /> | |
</svg> | |
</div> | |
</td> | |
</tr> | |
</tbody> | |
</table> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (1)
1453-1462
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance tooltip accessibility
The help text tooltip implementation should include proper ARIA attributes and keyboard interaction support.
<span class="field-helper-text wpuf-ml-2" :data-placement="placement" - data-toggle="tooltip" + role="tooltip" + :aria-label="text" + tabindex="0" + @keydown.enter="toggleTooltip" + @keydown.space="toggleTooltip" data-container="body"> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="18" height="18" fill="none" + role="img" + aria-hidden="true" >
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (1)
1430-1433
: Consider enhancing the text editor component.The current text editor implementation could be improved by:
- Adding support for keyboard shortcuts
- Implementing proper focus management
- Adding a toolbar customization option
- Supporting content formatting preservation
Would you like me to provide a more detailed implementation suggestion?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-radio/template.php
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-radio_field/template.php
(1 hunks)assets/js-templates/form-components.php
(16 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-radio_field/template.php
- admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/field-radio/template.php
🔇 Additional comments (1)
assets/js-templates/form-components.php (1)
148-165
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance accessibility of action buttons.
The action buttons lack proper ARIA labels and keyboard interaction support.
Add appropriate ARIA attributes and keyboard support:
<span :class="action_button_classes"> <i - class="fa fa-arrows move wpuf-pr-2 wpuf-rounded-l-md hover:!wpuf-cursor-move wpuf-border-r wpuf-border-green-200"></i> + class="fa fa-arrows move wpuf-pr-2 wpuf-rounded-l-md hover:!wpuf-cursor-move wpuf-border-r wpuf-border-green-200" + role="button" + tabindex="0" + aria-label="Move field" + @keydown.enter="handleMove" + @keydown.space="handleMove"></i> </span> <span :class="action_button_classes" + role="button" + tabindex="0" @click="open_field_settings(field.id)"> <i class="fa fa-pencil"></i> Edit </span>Likely invalid or redundant comment.
<h2 class="wpuf-text-lg wpuf-text-gray-800"><?php esc_html_e( 'Add fields and build your desired form', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?></h2> | ||
<p class="wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500"><?php esc_html_e( 'Add fields and build your desired form', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?></p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix duplicate text in empty state message.
The same text is used for both the heading and paragraph, which is redundant:
<h2>Add fields and build your desired form</h2>
<p>Add fields and build your desired form</p>
Consider using different, complementary messages to better guide the user. For example:
-<p class="wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500"><?php esc_html_e( 'Add fields and build your desired form', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?></p>
+<p class="wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500"><?php esc_html_e( 'Drag and drop fields from the right sidebar to start building your form', 'wp-user-frontend' ); ?></p>
<div | ||
v-if="field.inline !== 'yes'" | ||
class="wpuf-space-y-2"> | ||
<div | ||
v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | ||
class="wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center"> | ||
<input | ||
type="radio" | ||
:class="builder_class_names('radio')"> | ||
<label | ||
:value="val" | ||
:checked="is_selected(val)">{{ label }}</label> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
|
||
<span v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-help" v-html="field.help"/> | ||
<div | ||
v-else | ||
class="wpuf-space-y-6 sm:wpuf-flex sm:wpuf-items-center sm:wpuf-space-x-10 sm:wpuf-space-y-0"> | ||
<div | ||
v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | ||
class="wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center"> | ||
<input type="radio" :class="builder_class_names('radio')"> | ||
<label | ||
:value="val" | ||
:checked="is_selected(val)" | ||
class="wpuf-ml-3 wpuf-block wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-leading-6 wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label> | ||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
|
||
<p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance radio field accessibility.
The radio field template needs proper ARIA attributes for better accessibility.
<div class="wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center">
<input
type="radio"
+ :aria-label="label"
+ :aria-checked="is_selected(val)"
:class="builder_class_names('radio')">
<label
:value="val"
+ :for="'radio-' + val"
:checked="is_selected(val)"
class="wpuf-ml-3 wpuf-block wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-leading-6 wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label>
</div>
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<div | |
v-if="field.inline !== 'yes'" | |
class="wpuf-space-y-2"> | |
<div | |
v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | |
class="wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center"> | |
<input | |
type="radio" | |
:class="builder_class_names('radio')"> | |
<label | |
:value="val" | |
:checked="is_selected(val)">{{ label }}</label> | |
</div> | |
</div> | |
<span v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-help" v-html="field.help"/> | |
<div | |
v-else | |
class="wpuf-space-y-6 sm:wpuf-flex sm:wpuf-items-center sm:wpuf-space-x-10 sm:wpuf-space-y-0"> | |
<div | |
v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | |
class="wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center"> | |
<input type="radio" :class="builder_class_names('radio')"> | |
<label | |
:value="val" | |
:checked="is_selected(val)" | |
class="wpuf-ml-3 wpuf-block wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-leading-6 wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label> | |
</div> | |
</div> | |
<p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p> | |
<div | |
v-if="field.inline !== 'yes'" | |
class="wpuf-space-y-2"> | |
<div | |
v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | |
class="wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center"> | |
<input | |
type="radio" | |
:aria-label="label" | |
:aria-checked="is_selected(val)" | |
:class="builder_class_names('radio')"> | |
<label | |
:value="val" | |
:for="'radio-' + val" | |
:checked="is_selected(val)">{{ label }}</label> | |
</div> | |
</div> | |
<div | |
v-else | |
class="wpuf-space-y-6 sm:wpuf-flex sm:wpuf-items-center sm:wpuf-space-x-10 sm:wpuf-space-y-0"> | |
<div | |
v-if="has_options" v-for="(label, val) in field.options" | |
class="wpuf-flex wpuf-items-center"> | |
<input | |
type="radio" | |
:aria-label="label" | |
:aria-checked="is_selected(val)" | |
:class="builder_class_names('radio')"> | |
<label | |
:value="val" | |
:for="'radio-' + val" | |
:checked="is_selected(val)" | |
class="wpuf-ml-3 wpuf-block wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-leading-6 wpuf-text-gray-900">{{ label }}</label> | |
</div> | |
</div> | |
<p v-if="field.help" class="wpuf-mt-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-text-gray-500" v-html="field.help"></p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/global.js (1)
10-12
: Consider improving type safety and documentation of the pro status check.While the implementation is functional, there are a few improvements that could make it more robust:
- Consider using a boolean value instead of string comparison
- Add error handling for when
wpuf_form_builder
is undefined- Add JSDoc documentation explaining the property's purpose
Here's a suggested improvement:
+/** + * Checks if the pro version is active + * @returns {boolean} True if pro version is active, false otherwise + */ is_pro_active: function () { - return wpuf_form_builder.is_pro_active === '1'; + return Boolean(wpuf_form_builder?.is_pro_active); },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/global.js
(1 hunks)admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-v4.1.php
(1 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js
(6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- admin/form-builder/views/form-builder-v4.1.php
🔇 Additional comments (7)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/mixins/global.js (1)
8-12
: Verify integration with existing utility methods.The new
is_pro_active
property might affect the behavior of form builder features. Please ensure that all utility methods in this mixin handle both pro and free variations correctly.Let's verify the usage of this property across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Integration verified - implementation is consistent
The
is_pro_active
property is correctly integrated with existing utility methods across the codebase, consistently used for pro feature validation in field settings, and maintains uniform behavior in both pro and free variations.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of is_pro_active in Vue templates and components rg "is_pro_active" --type jsLength of output: 1462
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-mixins.js (6)
52-56
: LGTM! Well-structured pro feature check.The method effectively determines if a template should be shown as a pro preview based on the pro version status and template settings.
60-62
: LGTM! Clear and consistent button styling.The computed property provides a consistent set of Tailwind CSS classes for action buttons.
74-74
: Excellent fix for Vue.js props initialization!Using arrow functions to return default objects is the correct way to prevent shared references between component instances. This change follows Vue.js best practices and prevents potential bugs caused by mutating shared state.
Also applies to: 317-317, 322-322
89-89
: LGTM! Syntax fix.Fixed the missing closing brace in the computed property.
101-131
: Refactor class generation for better maintainability.The current implementation could be improved by:
- Extracting CSS classes to a configuration object
- Adding input validation
- Removing duplicate classes
This matches the refactoring suggestion from a previous review.
+ const FIELD_CLASSES = { + base: 'wpuf-block wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-py-1.5 wpuf-text-gray-900 wpuf-shadow-sm', + common: 'placeholder:wpuf-text-gray-400 sm:wpuf-text-sm sm:wpuf-leading-6', + upload_btn: 'file-selector wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-btn-secondary', + radio: 'wpuf-ml-3 wpuf-block wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-medium wpuf-leading-6 wpuf-text-gray-900', + checkbox: 'wpuf-h-4 wpuf-w-4 wpuf-rounded wpuf-border-gray-300 !wpuf-mt-0.5', + dropdown: 'wpuf-block wpuf-w-full wpuf-min-w-full' + }; builder_class_names: function(type_class) { + if (!type_class || typeof type_class !== 'string') { + console.warn('Invalid type_class provided to builder_class_names'); + return []; + } var commonClasses = ''; - switch (type_class) { - case 'upload_btn': - commonClasses = 'file-selector wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-btn-secondary'; - break; - // ... other cases + commonClasses = FIELD_CLASSES[type_class] || FIELD_CLASSES.base; + commonClasses += ' ' + FIELD_CLASSES.common; return [ type_class, this.required_class(), 'wpuf_' + this.field.name + '_' + this.form_id, commonClasses ]; },
161-163
: LGTM! Clear pro version status check.The computed property provides a clean way to check the pro version status throughout the application.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/index.js (2)
118-120
: Consider using a more type-safe approach for class definitions.The computed property correctly defines hover states using Tailwind CSS classes. However, consider using an array of classes for better maintainability and type safety.
- action_button_classes: function() { - return 'hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer hover:wpuf-text-white'; + action_button_classes: function() { + return [ + 'hover:wpuf-cursor-pointer', + 'hover:wpuf-text-white' + ].join(' '); + },
122-131
: Add input validation for columns count.The computed property correctly generates column classes, but could benefit from input validation to handle edge cases.
columnClasses: function() { - var columns_count = parseInt( this.field.columns ); + var columns_count = Math.max(1, Math.min(3, parseInt(this.field.columns) || 1)); var columns = []; for (var i = 1; i <= columns_count; i++) { columns.push('column-' + i); } return columns; }assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js (3)
332-332
: Simplify boolean expressionsThe ternary operators returning boolean literals can be simplified.
- return (this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature) ? true : false; + return !!(this.field_settings[template] && this.field_settings[template].pro_feature); - return (field.recaptcha_type && 'invisible_recaptcha' === field.recaptcha_type) ? true : false; + return !!(field.recaptcha_type && 'invisible_recaptcha' === field.recaptcha_type);Also applies to: 363-363
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
1557-1561
: Consider adding loading state for pro status checkThe component relies on a global
wpuf_form_builder.is_pro_active
check. Consider adding a loading state to handle cases where this check might be delayed.data: function () { return { searched_fields: '', is_pro_active: wpuf_form_builder.is_pro_active, + is_loading: true }; },
1665-1705
: Optimize search performanceThe search implementation rebuilds the entire panel structure on every keystroke. Consider debouncing the search to improve performance.
+ import { debounce } from 'lodash'; watch: { - searched_fields: function(searchValue) { + searched_fields: debounce(function(searchValue) { // ... existing code ... - } + }, 300) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/index.js
(4 hunks)assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
(15 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js
[error] 332-332: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 332-332: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 355-355: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 363-363: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.
(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
[error] 1631-1631: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
admin/form-builder/assets/js/components/form-column_field/index.js (3)
5-6
: LGTM! Mixins are properly declared.The mixins are correctly ordered and follow Vue.js best practices.
139-139
: LGTM! Pro feature validation is properly implemented.The pro feature check is correctly placed within the template availability validation, following good separation of concerns.
30-30
: Verify DOM structure matches new selectors.The selectors have been updated:
- Changed from
.wpuf-column-field-inner-columns
to.wpuf-field-columns
- Button removal now uses
.wpuf-field-button
Please ensure these changes align with the template structure in
#tmpl-wpuf-form-column_field
.Also applies to: 63-63
✅ Verification successful
Selector changes are correctly aligned with template structure
The updated selectors match the DOM structure in
assets/js-templates/form-components.php
:
.wpuf-field-columns
is the parent container with nested.wpuf-column-inner-fields
.wpuf-field-button
is correctly used for field buttons🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for template structure to verify selector changes rg -l "tmpl-wpuf-form-column_field" | xargs rg -A 5 "wpuf-field-columns|wpuf-field-button"Length of output: 5325
assets/js/wpuf-form-builder-components.js (3)
41-41
: Selector change improves drag handle specificityThe change to use
.field-buttons .move
as the handle selector provides better specificity and follows a more maintainable pattern.
777-782
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance accessibility for custom dropdown implementation
The custom dropdown implementation should include ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation support for better accessibility.
data: function () { return { showOptions: false, selectedOption: 'Select an option', + // Add aria attributes + ariaExpanded: false, + activeDescendant: null }; },Likely invalid or redundant comment.
300-319
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRemove unnecessary
this
aliasingThe use of
var self = this
is unnecessary when using arrow functions as they inherit the lexical scope.delete_field: function(index) { - var self = this; (Swal.fire({ - text: self.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg, + text: this.i18n.delete_field_warn_msg, icon: 'warning', showCancelButton: true, confirmButtonColor: '#d54e21', - confirmButtonText: self.i18n.yes_delete_it, - cancelButtonText: self.i18n.no_cancel_it, + confirmButtonText: this.i18n.yes_delete_it, + cancelButtonText: this.i18n.no_cancel_it, customClass: { confirmButton: 'btn btn-success', cancelButton: 'btn btn-danger', } })).then((result) => { if (result.isConfirmed) { - self.$store.commit('delete_form_field_element', index); + this.$store.commit('delete_form_field_element', index); } });Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 301-301: This aliasing of this is unnecessary.
Arrow functions inherits
this
from their enclosing scope.
Safe fix: Use this instead of an alias.(lint/complexity/noUselessThisAlias)
Vue.component('builder-stage-v4-1', { | ||
template: '#tmpl-wpuf-builder-stage-v4-1', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider extracting common logic between builder stages
The new builder-stage-v4-1
component largely duplicates code from the original builder-stage
component. Consider extracting shared functionality into a mixin or base component to improve maintainability.
+ const builderStageMixin = {
+ computed: {
+ form_fields() { ... },
+ field_settings() { ... },
+ hidden_fields() { ... },
+ editing_form_id() { ... },
+ pro_link() { ... }
+ },
+ methods: {
+ open_field_settings() { ... },
+ clone_field() { ... },
+ delete_field() { ... }
+ }
+ };
Vue.component('builder-stage-v4-1', {
template: '#tmpl-wpuf-builder-stage-v4-1',
- // Duplicate code
+ mixins: [builderStageMixin],
// Component-specific code
});
Also applies to: 191-192
$( this.$el ).tooltip({ | ||
title: this.text, | ||
placement: 'auto top' | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve tooltip initialization
The tooltip initialization should handle cleanup on component destroy to prevent memory leaks.
mounted: function () {
$(this.$el).tooltip({
title: this.text,
placement: 'auto top'
});
},
+ beforeDestroy: function() {
+ $(this.$el).tooltip('dispose');
+ }
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
$( this.$el ).tooltip({ | |
title: this.text, | |
placement: 'auto top' | |
}); | |
$( this.$el ).tooltip({ | |
title: this.text, | |
placement: 'auto top' | |
}); | |
beforeDestroy: function() { | |
$(this.$el).tooltip('dispose'); | |
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/css/admin/form-builder.css (3)
6-12
: Consider enhancing button accessibility and states.The button styles could benefit from additional accessibility and state improvements:
.wpuf-btn-primary { - @apply wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-bg-green-800 wpuf-text-white wpuf-px-3.5 wpuf-py-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-semibold hover:wpuf-bg-green-700 hover:wpuf-text-white focus:wpuf-text-white focus:wpuf-shadow-none; + @apply wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-bg-green-800 wpuf-text-white wpuf-px-3.5 wpuf-py-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-font-semibold + hover:wpuf-bg-green-700 hover:wpuf-text-white + focus:wpuf-text-white focus:wpuf-shadow-none focus:wpuf-outline-none focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-green-500 focus:wpuf-ring-offset-2 + disabled:wpuf-opacity-50 disabled:wpuf-cursor-not-allowed; } .wpuf-btn-secondary { - @apply wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-bg-green-50 wpuf-text-green-700 wpuf-px-3.5 wpuf-py-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-border wpuf-border-green-300 wpuf-font-semibold hover:wpuf-bg-green-100 hover:wpuf-text-white; + @apply wpuf-rounded-md wpuf-bg-green-50 wpuf-text-green-700 wpuf-px-3.5 wpuf-py-2 wpuf-text-sm wpuf-border wpuf-border-green-300 wpuf-font-semibold + hover:wpuf-bg-green-100 hover:wpuf-text-green-800 + focus:wpuf-outline-none focus:wpuf-ring-2 focus:wpuf-ring-green-500 focus:wpuf-ring-offset-2 + disabled:wpuf-opacity-50 disabled:wpuf-cursor-not-allowed; }
31-47
: Consider using Tailwind's built-in transition utilities.Instead of creating custom utilities, you could use Tailwind's built-in transition utilities like
transition-all
,duration-100
, andease-out
. This would reduce code duplication and maintain consistency with Tailwind's utility-first approach.
65-68
: Avoid using !important declarations.Using
!important
is generally discouraged as it makes styles harder to override and maintain. Consider increasing selector specificity or restructuring the CSS..selectize-control.multi .selectize-input [data-value] { - background: #16a34a !important; - border: 1px solid transparent !important; + background: #16a34a; + border: 1px solid transparent; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/css/admin/form-builder.css
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/css/admin/form-builder.css
[error] 93-93: expected }
but instead the file ends
the file ends here
(parse)
[error] 62-62: Unexpected shorthand property background after background-color
(lint/suspicious/noShorthandPropertyOverrides)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/css/admin/form-builder.css (3)
1-3
: LGTM! Tailwind directives are properly imported.
49-56
: LGTM! Smooth transition implementation for dropdown items.
70-93
:⚠️ Potential issueSimplify form field width styles and fix syntax.
- The width styles are duplicated with and without the
body
selector. Consider consolidating them.- The file is missing a closing brace.
-ul.wpuf-form li.field-size-small .wpuf-fields { - width: 30%; -} - -ul.wpuf-form li.field-size-medium .wpuf-fields { - width: 50%; -} - #wpuf-form-builder .wpuf-fields { float: none; width: auto; } + body ul.wpuf-form li.field-size-large .wpuf-fields { width: 100% !important; } + body ul.wpuf-form li.field-size-medium .wpuf-fields { width: 50% !important; } + body ul.wpuf-form li.field-size-small .wpuf-fields { width: 30% !important; } + body ul.wpuf-form li .wpuf-fields { width: 70% !important; -} +}}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 93-93: expected
}
but instead the file endsthe file ends here
(parse)
.wpuf-pattern-1 { | ||
border: 1px dashed #ddd; | ||
background-color: #ffffff; | ||
opacity: 1; | ||
background: repeating-linear-gradient( -45deg, #dcfce7, #dcfce7 2px, #ffffff 2px, #ffffff 6px ); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix background property override.
The background-color
property is being overridden by the background
shorthand property. Combine them or remove the redundant property.
.wpuf-pattern-1 {
border: 1px dashed #ddd;
- background-color: #ffffff;
- opacity: 1;
- background: repeating-linear-gradient( -45deg, #dcfce7, #dcfce7 2px, #ffffff 2px, #ffffff 6px );
+ background: #ffffff repeating-linear-gradient( -45deg, #dcfce7, #dcfce7 2px, #ffffff 2px, #ffffff 6px );
+ opacity: 1;
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
.wpuf-pattern-1 { | |
border: 1px dashed #ddd; | |
background-color: #ffffff; | |
opacity: 1; | |
background: repeating-linear-gradient( -45deg, #dcfce7, #dcfce7 2px, #ffffff 2px, #ffffff 6px ); | |
} | |
.wpuf-pattern-1 { | |
border: 1px dashed #ddd; | |
background: #ffffff repeating-linear-gradient( -45deg, #dcfce7, #dcfce7 2px, #ffffff 2px, #ffffff 6px ); | |
opacity: 1; | |
} |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 62-62: Unexpected shorthand property background after background-color
(lint/suspicious/noShorthandPropertyOverrides)
fixes #661
For the form builder revamp add blank-form state. update the field icons as per design and do some other small design changes.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Performance
Compatibility
Styling