Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Identify what makes print less likely to violate group privacy than the web. #248

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 12, 2023

Conversation

jyasskin
Copy link
Collaborator

@jyasskin jyasskin commented Apr 11, 2023

While advertisers can easily buy ads in particular publications to
target groups of users, a researcher can look at the content of those
publications to see the same content that's shown to all readers.
Online, each visitor can see a different set of ads, so we need other
mechanisms to help researchers discover problems. Web standards can
define those mechanisms.

This tries to fix #235. How'd I do, @michaelkleber?


Preview | Diff

…he web.

While advertisers can easily buy ads in particular publications to
target groups of users, a researcher can look at the content of those
publications to see the same content that's shown to all readers.
Online, each visitor can see a different set of ads, so we need other
mechanisms to help researchers discover problems. Web standards can
define those mechanisms.
index.html Outdated
Magazine</var> or <var>site.example</var> is predominantly read by [=people=]
of a given race or gender, and decide not to run its job ads there. Readers of
those publications are implicitly having their [=data=] processed in
[=inappropriate=] ways ([[?Relational-Governance]]).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it worth losing , with no way to discover the discrimination or seek relief?

Copy link
Member

@darobin darobin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nitpick, but otherwise fine.

Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Yasskin <[email protected]>
@torgo torgo merged commit 117aed0 into w3ctag:main Apr 12, 2023
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2023
…he web. (#248)

SHA: 117aed0
Reason: push, by torgo

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Is all print advertising a violation of collective privacy?
3 participants