Skip to content

update a python-sdk version#249

Open
LiZhenCheng9527 wants to merge 1 commit intovolcano-sh:mainfrom
LiZhenCheng9527:python-sdk
Open

update a python-sdk version#249
LiZhenCheng9527 wants to merge 1 commit intovolcano-sh:mainfrom
LiZhenCheng9527:python-sdk

Conversation

@LiZhenCheng9527
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

update python-sdk project version in pyproject.toml to auto push new python sdk version to pypi

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:


Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 1, 2026 03:47
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Bumps the published Python SDK package version so a new agentcube-sdk release can be pushed to PyPI.

Changes:

  • Increment agentcube-sdk version in pyproject.toml from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the version of the agentcube-sdk package from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1 in the pyproject.toml file. The review feedback suggests enhancing the package metadata by adding authors and classifiers to improve its discoverability on PyPI, and also recommends considering dynamic versioning for more robust release management.

[project]
name = "agentcube-sdk"
version = "0.1.0"
version = "0.1.1"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Since this version bump is intended for a PyPI release, it is highly recommended to include additional metadata in the [project] section. Fields such as authors and classifiers improve the package's discoverability and provide essential information to users on PyPI. Additionally, for automated release workflows, consider using dynamic versioning (e.g., setuptools-scm) to keep the version in sync with git tags, ensuring the package version always matches the repository state.

version = "0.1.1"
authors = [
    { name = "Volcano Authors" }
]
classifiers = [
    "Programming Language :: Python :: 3",
    "License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License",
    "Operating System :: OS Independent",
]

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Apr 1, 2026

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 43.32%. Comparing base (845b798) to head (a40a79b).
⚠️ Report is 155 commits behind head on main.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #249      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   35.60%   43.32%   +7.71%     
==========================================
  Files          29       30       +1     
  Lines        2533     2613      +80     
==========================================
+ Hits          902     1132     +230     
+ Misses       1505     1358     -147     
+ Partials      126      123       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 43.32% <ø> (+7.71%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@acsoto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

acsoto commented Apr 2, 2026

/lgtm

@acsoto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

acsoto commented Apr 2, 2026

If this is for testing purposes, could we add a suffix? It would be better for the version 0.1.1 to follow the version number of the AgentCube itself?

@volcano-sh-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@LiZhenCheng9527
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

If this is for testing purposes, could we add a suffix? It would be better for the version 0.1.1 to follow the version number of the AgentCube itself?

Done

@volcano-sh-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from acsoto. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 3, 2026 01:56
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Signed-off-by: LiZhenCheng9527 <[email protected]>
[project]
name = "agentcube-sdk"
version = "0.1.0"
version = "0.1.1.dev0"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
version = "0.1.1.dev0"
version = "0.1-dev"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We now have agentcube-sdk 0.1.0. If a new release is made with the SDK as 0.1-dev, it might lead people to think that 0.1.0 is the latest version, which is misleading.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we need to re push 0.1.0, previous one is not right

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants