chore: license name missing from documentation#1494
chore: license name missing from documentation#1494Olexandr88 wants to merge 1 commit intovitwit:masterfrom
Conversation
|
@Olexandr88 is attempting to deploy a commit to the my-app's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe README file was updated to clarify the specific license type by replacing the generic term "License" with "MIT License" in the license section. The link to the license file itself was not changed. Changes
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
83-85: Use a relative link instead of a hard-coded branch referenceHard-coding
masterin the URL can break the link if the repo’s default branch changes (many projects have already moved tomain). A relative path is branch-agnostic and also works in forks and local clones.-Released under the [MIT License](https://github.com/vitwit/resolute/blob/master/LICENSE). +Released under the [MIT License](./LICENSE).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Summary
Summary by CodeRabbit