Skip to content

Conversation

@hb1998
Copy link

@hb1998 hb1998 commented Jan 13, 2025

@codiumai-pr-agent-free
Copy link

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Typo

The label for matrix premium tier has a typo - "tp" instead of "to" in "1 tp 19 users"

label: "Premium Matrix 1(1 tp 19 users)",

@codiumai-pr-agent-free
Copy link

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
General
Correct spelling and spacing in user-facing text to maintain professionalism

Fix the typo in the label text for Premium Matrix 1 - "tp" should be "to" and there
should be a space after the parenthesis.

licences.js [22-23]

 {
   value: "xviz.inforiver-premium.tier1-premium",
-  label: "Premium Matrix 1(1 tp 19 users)",
+  label: "Premium Matrix 1 (1 to 19 users)",
 }
  • Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

Why: The suggestion addresses both a spelling error ("tp" instead of "to") and spacing inconsistency in user-facing text. This is more important as it fixes actual content errors that could affect user understanding.

7
Maintain consistent spacing in label formatting across all plan descriptions

Fix the typo in the label text for ValQ Premium Small plan - there should be a space
after the parenthesis for consistency with other labels.

licences.js [3-5]

 {
   value: "valq-premium.tier1-premium",
-  label: "ValQ Premium Small(5 to 24 users)",
+  label: "ValQ Premium Small (5 to 24 users)",
 }
  • Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies an inconsistency in spacing after the parenthesis in the label text. While this is a valid formatting improvement for better readability, it's a minor cosmetic issue.

4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants