-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 783
Add Rule.Equal method. #1095
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
stephanreiter
wants to merge
1
commit into
vishvananda:main
Choose a base branch
from
stephanreiter:add-rule-equal
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Add Rule.Equal method. #1095
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Seeing this failure: Seems to have been present in other recent PRs, so apparently not introduced here. |
be83fa0 to
bb01d76
Compare
stephanreiter
pushed a commit
to stephanreiter/netlink
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2025
When reading rules, makes sure to populate the type field of Rule. Also adds a l3mdev flag to Rule, reads it when listing rules, sets it when updating rules, and makes sure it is taken into account when comparing rules using Equal as introduced in vishvananda#1095.
This should be fixed now that #1106 is merged. Could you please rebase your branch and try again? |
stephanreiter
pushed a commit
to stephanreiter/netlink
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2025
When reading rules, makes sure to populate the type field of Rule. Also adds a l3mdev flag to Rule, reads it when listing rules, sets it when updating rules, and makes sure it is taken into account when comparing rules using Equal as introduced in vishvananda#1095.
bb01d76 to
e8c1398
Compare
This adds an implementation of Rule.Equal (and RulePortRange.Equal, RuleUIDRange.Equal) which allows us to compare two Rule objects.
e8c1398 to
6a8c071
Compare
stephanreiter
pushed a commit
to stephanreiter/netlink
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2025
When reading rules, makes sure to populate the type field of Rule. Also adds a l3mdev flag to Rule, reads it when listing rules, sets it when updating rules, and makes sure it is taken into account when comparing rules using Equal as introduced in vishvananda#1095.
|
Thank you for letting me know. All green now. |
stephanreiter
pushed a commit
to stephanreiter/netlink
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2025
When reading rules, makes sure to populate the type field of Rule. Also adds a l3mdev flag to Rule, reads it when listing rules, sets it when updating rules, and makes sure it is taken into account when comparing rules using Equal as introduced in vishvananda#1095.
stephanreiter
pushed a commit
to stephanreiter/netlink
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2025
When reading rules, makes sure to populate the type field of Rule. Also adds a l3mdev flag to Rule, reads it when listing rules, sets it when updating rules, and makes sure it is taken into account when comparing rules using Equal as introduced in vishvananda#1095.
stephanreiter
pushed a commit
to stephanreiter/netlink
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2025
When reading rules, makes sure to populate the type field of Rule. Also adds a l3mdev flag to Rule, reads it when listing rules, sets it when updating rules, and makes sure it is taken into account when comparing rules using Equal as introduced in vishvananda#1095.
stephanreiter
pushed a commit
to stephanreiter/netlink
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2025
When reading rules, makes sure to populate the type field of Rule. Also adds a l3mdev flag to Rule, reads it when listing rules, sets it when updating rules, and makes sure it is taken into account when comparing rules using Equal as introduced in vishvananda#1095.
stephanreiter
pushed a commit
to stephanreiter/netlink
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2025
When reading rules, makes sure to populate the type field of Rule. Also adds a l3mdev flag to Rule, reads it when listing rules, sets it when updating rules, and makes sure it is taken into account when comparing rules using Equal as introduced in vishvananda#1095.
stephanreiter
pushed a commit
to stephanreiter/netlink
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2025
When reading rules, makes sure to populate the type field of Rule. Also adds a l3mdev flag to Rule, reads it when listing rules, sets it when updating rules, and makes sure it is taken into account when comparing rules using Equal as introduced in vishvananda#1095.
stephanreiter
pushed a commit
to stephanreiter/netlink
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2025
When reading rules, makes sure to populate the type field of Rule. Note that an unspecified type is interpreted as UNICAST, for example, when adding a rule. To make sure that a rule with unspecified type, which was just added, compares equal to that rule being read back, we we update Rule.Equal to treat unspecified and UNICAST types as equal. Also adds a l3mdev flag to Rule, reads it when listing rules, sets it when updating rules, and makes sure it is taken into account when comparing rules using Equal as introduced in vishvananda#1095.
tklauser
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds an implementation of
Rule.Equal(andRulePortRange.Equal,RuleUIDRange.Equal) which allows us to compare twoRuleobjects.It fixes #1094