Skip to content

chore: fix jsdoc for quickfix source #7

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2025

Conversation

mityu
Copy link
Contributor

@mityu mityu commented Mar 9, 2025

The documentation of the quickfix source was one for the oldfiles source. This PR fixes it.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.48%. Comparing base (16197bc) to head (0089856).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #7      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   50.65%   51.48%   +0.83%     
==========================================
  Files          77       78       +1     
  Lines        2278     2317      +39     
  Branches       67       70       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         1154     1193      +39     
  Misses       1124     1124              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@lambdalisue lambdalisue merged commit 88d3c5a into vim-fall:main Mar 9, 2025
7 checks passed
@mityu mityu deleted the fix-quickfix-source-jsdoc branch March 10, 2025 12:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants