docs: Fix tool calling repair re-ask strategy example #6244
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background
The
ToolCallPart.argshould be a JSON-serializable object matching the tool's input schema. When theexperimental_repairToolCallfunction receives a toolCall parameter asLanguageModelV1FunctionToolCalltype, its .arg property contains a stringified JSON object. Therefore, when usingtoolCall.argin a generateText call, we need to parse this stringified JSON object first.Summary
Fixed example related to issue mentioned in background section.
Tasks