-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Add test for validate_all with adorned node and ignore undefined outputs #3447
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
dvargas92495
merged 2 commits into
main
from
devin/1766508253-test-validate-all-adornment
Dec 23, 2025
+134
−1
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -779,3 +779,134 @@ class Outputs(BaseWorkflow.Outputs): | |
|
|
||
| # AND the then_outputs should be serialized correctly | ||
| assert serialized_mock["then_outputs"]["result"] == "mocked_result" | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_mocks__validate_all__try_node_wrapped_node_deserializes_correctly(): | ||
| """ | ||
| Tests that validate_all correctly deserializes a mock for a node wrapped in a TryNode adornment. | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
||
| # GIVEN a node wrapped in a TryNode adornment | ||
| @TryNode.wrap() | ||
| class WrappedNode(BaseNode): | ||
| class Outputs(BaseNode.Outputs): | ||
| result: str | ||
|
|
||
| # AND a workflow that uses the wrapped node | ||
| class MyWorkflow(BaseWorkflow): | ||
| graph = WrappedNode | ||
|
|
||
| class Outputs(BaseWorkflow.Outputs): | ||
| final_result = WrappedNode.Outputs.result | ||
|
|
||
| # AND the inner wrapped node's ID | ||
| inner_node = WrappedNode.__wrapped_node__ | ||
| assert inner_node is not None | ||
|
|
||
| # AND a raw mock workflow node execution using the inner node's ID | ||
| raw_mock_workflow_node_executions = [ | ||
| { | ||
| "node_id": str(inner_node.__id__), | ||
| "when_condition": { | ||
| "type": "BINARY_EXPRESSION", | ||
| "operator": ">=", | ||
| "lhs": { | ||
| "type": "EXECUTION_COUNTER", | ||
| "node_id": str(inner_node.__id__), | ||
| }, | ||
| "rhs": { | ||
| "type": "CONSTANT_VALUE", | ||
| "value": { | ||
| "type": "NUMBER", | ||
| "value": 1, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| "then_outputs": { | ||
| "result": "mocked_result", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| # WHEN we parse the raw data on MockNodeExecution | ||
| node_output_mocks = MockNodeExecution.validate_all( | ||
| raw_mock_workflow_node_executions, | ||
| MyWorkflow, | ||
| descriptor_validator=base_descriptor_validator, | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| # THEN we get a list with one MockNodeExecution object | ||
| assert node_output_mocks is not None | ||
| assert len(node_output_mocks) == 1 | ||
|
|
||
| # AND the MockNodeExecution has the correct when_condition | ||
| assert node_output_mocks[0].when_condition == inner_node.Execution.count.greater_than_or_equal_to(1) | ||
|
|
||
| # AND the then_outputs is the correct type with the expected value | ||
| assert node_output_mocks[0].then_outputs == inner_node.Outputs(result="mocked_result") | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_mocks__validate_all__ignores_undefined_outputs(): | ||
| """ | ||
| Tests that validate_all ignores outputs that are not defined in the node's Outputs class. | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
||
| # GIVEN a node wrapped in a TryNode adornment | ||
| @TryNode.wrap() | ||
| class WrappedNode(BaseNode): | ||
| class Outputs(BaseNode.Outputs): | ||
| result: str | ||
|
|
||
| # AND a workflow that uses the wrapped node | ||
| class MyWorkflow(BaseWorkflow): | ||
| graph = WrappedNode | ||
|
|
||
| class Outputs(BaseWorkflow.Outputs): | ||
| final_result = WrappedNode.Outputs.result | ||
|
|
||
| # AND the inner wrapped node's ID | ||
| inner_node = WrappedNode.__wrapped_node__ | ||
| assert inner_node is not None | ||
|
|
||
| # AND a raw mock workflow node execution with an undefined "error" output | ||
| raw_mock_workflow_node_executions = [ | ||
| { | ||
| "node_id": str(inner_node.__id__), | ||
| "when_condition": { | ||
| "type": "BINARY_EXPRESSION", | ||
| "operator": ">=", | ||
| "lhs": { | ||
| "type": "EXECUTION_COUNTER", | ||
| "node_id": str(inner_node.__id__), | ||
| }, | ||
| "rhs": { | ||
| "type": "CONSTANT_VALUE", | ||
| "value": { | ||
| "type": "NUMBER", | ||
| "value": 1, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| "then_outputs": { | ||
| "result": "mocked_result", | ||
| "error": "some error value", | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. we should be able to support this for adorned nodes, but leaving oos for now |
||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| # WHEN we parse the raw data on MockNodeExecution | ||
| node_output_mocks = MockNodeExecution.validate_all( | ||
| raw_mock_workflow_node_executions, | ||
| MyWorkflow, | ||
| descriptor_validator=base_descriptor_validator, | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| # THEN we get a list with one MockNodeExecution object | ||
| assert node_output_mocks is not None | ||
| assert len(node_output_mocks) == 1 | ||
|
|
||
| # AND the then_outputs only contains the declared "result" output | ||
| assert node_output_mocks[0].then_outputs == inner_node.Outputs(result="mocked_result") | ||
|
|
||
| # AND the "error" output was ignored and is not present | ||
| assert not hasattr(node_output_mocks[0].then_outputs, "error") | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DevinAI what happens if we add an
"error"output here and change nothing else about the test?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tested this - adding an
"error"output tothen_outputscauses aWorkflowInitializationExceptionwith the message "Failed to validate mock node executions".The root cause is a
NodeException: Unexpected outputs: {'error'}raised fromBaseOutputs.__init__because the inner wrapped node'sOutputsclass only declaresresult: str, noterror.The validation correctly rejects outputs that aren't declared on the node's Outputs class.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Create a second test that exhibits this.
In that test, ensure that we pass. Doing so will require us updating the business logic of deserializing node outputs to ignore any outputs that are not defined in the class
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DevinAI apply the feedback I just left in this comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done! I've added a second test (
test_mocks__validate_all__ignores_undefined_outputs) that includes an"error"output inthen_outputsand verifies it's ignored.I also updated
BaseOutputs.__get_pydantic_core_schema__to filter out undefined outputs during deserialization. The strict validation inBaseOutputs.__init__is preserved for normal runtime construction.