SRC-01 and SR0-01 #1758
SRC-01 and SR0-01 #1758
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThis pull request introduces modifications to several files in the CodeRabbit project, focusing primarily on the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant Clause
participant VTHO Token
Caller->>Clause: transferVTHOToken(recipientAddress, amount)
Clause->>VTHO Token: Transfer VTHO tokens
VTHO Token-->>Clause: Confirm transfer
Clause-->>Caller: Return transfer result
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@CodeRabbit review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/core/src/transaction/Clause.ts (1)
Line range hint
219-230: Documentation needs to be updated to match the new method signature.The documentation still references the removed
tokenAddressparameter and mentions VIP180 tokens generically, while the method now specifically handles VTHO tokens.Apply this diff to update the documentation:
/** - * Return a new clause to transfers the specified amount of VTHO + * Returns a new clause to transfer the specified amount of VTHO tokens * - * @param {Address} tokenAddress - The address of the VIP180 token. * @param {Address} recipientAddress - The address of the recipient. * @param {VTHO} amount - The amount of token to be transferred. - * @param {ClauseOptions} [clauseOptions] - Optional clause settings. * @return {Clause} The clause to transfer VIP180 tokens as part of a transaction. * @throws {InvalidDataType} Throws an error if the amount is not a positive integer. * * @see VTHO.transferTokenTo */
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/core/src/transaction/Clause.ts (1)
247-250: Error message needs to be more specific.The error message should reflect that this is specifically for VTHO token transfers.
Apply this diff to improve the error message:
throw new InvalidDataType( 'Clause.transferVTHOToken', - 'not positive integer amount', + 'VTHO transfer amount must be a positive integer', { amount: `${amount.value}` } );packages/core/tests/transaction/Clause.unit.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
199-291: Test coverage looks comprehensive.The test suite thoroughly covers the VTHO token transfer functionality:
- Tests various amounts (1 wei, 100 wei, 1 VTHO, 500M VTHO)
- Includes error cases (negative, infinite, NaN amounts)
- Verifies the correct VTHO address and transfer comment
However, there's room for additional test cases:
Consider adding these test cases:
- Test with zero amount (should fail)
- Test with very large amounts (near max safe integer)
- Test with invalid recipient address format
Example for zero amount test:
test('Throw error <- zero amount VTHO', () => { expect(() => { Clause.transferVTHOToken(ClauseFixture.to, VTHO.of(0)); }).toThrow(InvalidDataType); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
packages/core/src/transaction/Clause.ts(6 hunks)packages/core/tests/transaction/Clause.unit.test.ts(6 hunks)packages/network/src/provider/providers/hardhat-provider/hardhat-provider.ts(1 hunks)packages/network/src/signer/signers/vechain-abstract-signer/vechain-abstract-signer.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- packages/network/src/signer/signers/vechain-abstract-signer/vechain-abstract-signer.ts
- packages/network/src/provider/providers/hardhat-provider/hardhat-provider.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (12)
- GitHub Check: rpc-proxy / test / test
- GitHub Check: rpc-proxy / docker / docker
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test-browser / Build & Lint (latest)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test / Build & Lint (latest)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test-browser / Build & Lint (lts/*)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test / Build & Lint (lts/*)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test-browser / Build & Lint (18)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test / Build & Lint (18)
- GitHub Check: test-apps / Install and test example apps
- GitHub Check: install-build / Build & Lint
- GitHub Check: Execute doc examples
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/core/src/transaction/Clause.ts (2)
6-6: LGTM! Import changes look good.The imports are correctly organized, with
Addresstype andVTHO_ADDRESSconstant properly imported.Also applies to: 18-18
230-244: LGTM! Implementation changes look good.The method has been correctly simplified to handle VTHO tokens specifically:
- Removed the generic
tokenAddressparameter- Uses the
VTHO_ADDRESSconstant- Added a descriptive comment for the transfer operation
packages/core/tests/transaction/Clause.unit.test.ts (1)
14-15: LGTM! Import changes look good.The imports are correctly organized, with
ABIContractandVTHO_ADDRESSproperly imported.
Test CoverageSummary
|
Description
Fixes audit review items SRC-01 and SR0-01
Fixes #1671
Fixed #1672
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration
Test Configuration:
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Documentation
Refactor
Tests
The changes focus on improving the precision and clarity of token transfer functionality and associated documentation.