-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 940
Add ValkeyModule_ACLCheckCommandPermissionsForCurrentUser API #2690
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
rjd15372
wants to merge
8
commits into
valkey-io:unstable
Choose a base branch
from
rjd15372:acl-check-cmd-permission
base: unstable
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+78
−19
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ac171ad
Add ValkeyModule_ACLCheckCommandPermissionsForContextUser API
rjd15372 71ce27c
Use new API in existing module test
rjd15372 5111bd4
remove nonsensical condition
rjd15372 8238124
Rename to VM_ACLCheckCommandPermissionsForCurrentUser
rjd15372 cfc47a6
fix formatting
rjd15372 0273be0
change logic to error out when no user is in context
rjd15372 ac071e6
error improvement
rjd15372 f65208b
fix wrong include
rjd15372 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This entire API is because we're trying to bypass the allocation and do it on the stack here. When the API was written, we cared more about abstraction then performance. If we think performance is so critical, I would rather just ditch the abstraction and directly return the user from the module APIs.
Glancing through the code I don't see any incompatibility with that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you proposing to make
ValkeyModuleUsera type alias touser?In that case we would probably need to add a field in the
userstruct to distinguish between users created by modules, and users created in the core.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. We don't expect a large number of users, so adding an extra field should be safe. I think we even have a bit field we could use if we wanted to avoid adding any memory at all.