Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Presentation and readme #2

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

tetikshajain
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
---
title: 'Processing potential fields data with Fatiando a Terra'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we need to update the title here "Comparing strategies for assessing uncertainty with geophysical inversions for mineral exploration"

@lheagy lheagy added the paper label Oct 30, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Curvenote Preview

Directory Preview Checks Updated (UTC)
abstract 🔍 Inspect 5/15 checks passed Oct 30, 2024, 10:08 PM

title: 'Comparing strategies for assessing uncertainty with geophysical inversions for mineral exploration'

abstract: |
Drilling plays a crucial role in exploration programs, and geophysical data often aid in choosing drill locations. Electromagnetic methods, sensitive to subsurface conductivity, are commonly used to create subsurface models for this purpose. However, geophysical inversions are inherently non-unique, as multiple Earth models can fit the data. Therefore, the uncertainty in the obtained models is of interest. However, formal uncertainty quantification poses a challenge, given the difficulty in translating the ultimate decision into a mathematical framework. Our work is to aim at using a blend of deterministic and Bayesian methods to assess uncertainty.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants