3.1.0 #41
3.1.0 #41
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on updates to Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- apps/solid/package.json (1 hunks)
- components/solid/README.md (1 hunks)
- components/solid/package.json (1 hunks)
- components/solid/src/IParticlesProps.ts (0 hunks)
- components/solid/src/Particles.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/solid/src/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- renovate.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- components/solid/src/IParticlesProps.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- README.md
- components/solid/README.md
- components/solid/src/index.tsx
- package.json
- renovate.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
apps/solid/package.json (2)
19-23:⚠️ Potential issueCaution: Beta versions and version inconsistencies in dependencies.
The updates to dependencies introduce some potential risks:
- @tsparticles/configs and @tsparticles/engine are updated to beta versions (^3.6.0-beta.0).
- solid-js is updated from ^1.8.11 to ^1.9.1, which is a minor version update.
- tsparticles remains at ^3.5.0, which is inconsistent with the other tsparticles packages.
Consider the following recommendations:
- Be cautious when using beta versions in production. Ensure thorough testing is performed.
- Align all tsparticles packages to the same version to avoid potential compatibility issues.
- Update tsparticles to ^3.6.0-beta.0 to match the other tsparticles packages.
To check for any known issues or breaking changes in the beta versions, run the following script:
13-16: Approved: DevDependencies version updates look good.The updates to devDependencies seem appropriate:
- solid-devtools: ^0.29.2 → ^0.30.1
- typescript: ^5.3.3 → ^5.6.2
- vite: ^5.0.11 → ^5.4.8
- vite-plugin-solid: ^2.8.2 → ^2.10.2
These are minor version updates, which should maintain backwards compatibility. However, the TypeScript and Vite updates are more significant.
To ensure there are no breaking changes, please review the changelogs for these packages, especially for TypeScript and Vite. You may also want to run your test suite to catch any potential issues. Here's a script to fetch the latest changelogs:
components/solid/src/Particles.tsx (1)
15-15: Approve simplification, but verify removal ofconfig.paramsThe simplification of the options assignment is a good change. However, we need to ensure that the removal of
config.paramsis intentional and consistent with the rest of the project.
- Please confirm that
config.paramswas intentionally removed from theIParticlesPropsinterface.- Consider adding a comment explaining why
config.paramswas removed to prevent future confusion.Let's check for consistency across the project:
This script will help us verify if
config.paramsis still used elsewhere in the project and locate theIParticlesPropsinterface definition for further investigation.✅ Verification successful
Approved Simplification:
config.paramsRemoval VerifiedThe removal of
config.paramsfrom the options assignment is intentional and does not impact other parts of the codebase.
- Verified that
config.paramsis not used elsewhere in the project.- Confirmed that
IParticlesPropsinterface has been updated accordingly.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of config.params in other files # Search for config.params in TypeScript and JavaScript files echo "Searching for config.params usage:" rg --type-add 'script:*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' -t script 'config\.params' # Search for IParticlesProps interface definition echo "\nSearching for IParticlesProps interface definition:" rg --type-add 'script:*.{ts,tsx}' -t script 'interface\s+IParticlesProps'Length of output: 416
components/solid/package.json (6)
2-14: LGTM: Package information is well-defined and comprehensive.The basic package information is correctly specified, including name, version, description, license, author, and homepage. The main, module, and types fields are properly set, and the publishConfig ensures public access. The description effectively communicates the package's purpose and compatibility.
15-17: Good addition: "files" field explicitly defines package contents.The addition of the "files" field specifying only the "dist" directory is a good practice. It ensures that only the necessary production files are included in the published package, keeping it lightweight and focused.
18-25: Excellent: Added "bugs" and "repository" fields enhance package metadata.The addition of "bugs" and "repository" fields provides valuable information for users and potential contributors. The URLs point to the correct GitHub repository, and the inclusion of the directory information in the repository field is particularly helpful for monorepo setups.
26-39: Great addition: "funding" field supports open-source sustainability.The inclusion of the "funding" field with multiple options (GitHub Sponsors for both the author and the project, and Buy Me a Coffee) is an excellent way to support the ongoing development of this open-source project. It provides users with flexible options to contribute financially.
40-93: Excellent: Comprehensive "keywords" improve package discoverability.The addition of an extensive and relevant list of keywords will significantly enhance the package's discoverability on npm. The keywords cover a wide range of related technologies, frameworks, and concepts, accurately representing the package's scope and potential use cases.
94-109: Well structured: "exports" field enhances module resolution and TypeScript support.The "exports" field is well-structured, providing separate entry points for development and production builds, as well as type definitions. This setup supports modern module resolution in various environments and improves TypeScript integration. The clear separation between development and production builds is a good practice for optimizing performance in different scenarios.
| "peerDependencies": { | ||
| "@tsparticles/engine": ">=3", | ||
| "solid-js": ">=1.0.0" | ||
| }, | ||
| "devDependencies": { | ||
| "@tsparticles/engine": "^3.6.0-beta.0", | ||
| "@tsparticles/prettier-config": "^2.1.6", | ||
| "@types/node": "^22.7.5", | ||
| "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "^7.18.0", | ||
| "@typescript-eslint/parser": "^7.18.0", | ||
| "concurrently": "^9.0.1", | ||
| "esbuild": "^0.24.0", | ||
| "esbuild-plugin-solid": "^0.6.0", | ||
| "eslint": "^8.57.0", | ||
| "eslint-plugin-eslint-comments": "^3.2.0", | ||
| "eslint-plugin-no-only-tests": "^3.3.0", | ||
| "jsdom": "^25.0.1", | ||
| "prettier": "3.3.3", | ||
| "solid-js": "^1.9.1", | ||
| "tsup": "^8.3.0", | ||
| "tsup-preset-solid": "^2.2.0", | ||
| "typescript": "^5.6.2", | ||
| "vite": "^5.4.8", | ||
| "vite-plugin-solid": "^2.10.2", | ||
| "vitest": "^1.6.0" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Update CHANGELOG.md with @tsparticles/engine peer dependency change.
The current CHANGELOG.md does not mention the update to the @tsparticles/engine peer dependency requiring version >=3. Please add this information to inform users of the potential breaking change.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approved: Dependencies updated and comprehensive scripts retained.
The updates to peer and dev dependencies are good for keeping the package current and secure. The scripts cover a wide range of development tasks, which is excellent for maintainability.
However, please note the following:
- The peer dependency for @tsparticles/engine has been updated to require version 3 or higher. This change might require users to update their @tsparticles/engine version.
To ensure this change is properly documented, please run the following command:
- Consider adding a note in the CHANGELOG.md about this peer dependency update to inform users of potential breaking changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the CHANGELOG.md file mentions the update to @tsparticles/engine peer dependency
grep -i "@tsparticles/engine.*>= *3" CHANGELOG.md || echo "Warning: CHANGELOG.md may need to be updated to mention the new @tsparticles/engine peer dependency requirement."
Length of output: 286
|
@matteobruni are you waiting for other things before merging this? I'd like to pull the pull the updates for a project I'm working on. I'm guessing this is the PR that will get it published to npm. |
yep I'm working on this tsparticles/tsparticles#5404 |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
package.jsonfiles with new fields for better package management and support.Bug Fixes
Chores
package.jsonfiles for improved functionality and security.