NAS-132626 / 25.04 / Fix styles for contract mentions on sys-info widgets on the dashboard

[RehanY147]

Changes:

Fix styles for contract mentions on sys-info widgets on the dashboard

Testing:

Change the license to "Silver International" and see that the styles look good for system info widgets.

[bugclerk]

Jira URL: https://ixsystems.atlassian.net/browse/NAS-132626

[undsoft]

So two things:

1. Text is not aligned for me:

2. I don't know how silver international is going to be represented on MW, but if it's going to be SILVER_INTERNATIONAL like other enums, this is going to result in Silver_international Contract on main dashboard and Contract Type: SILVER_INTERNATIONAL on Support card in settings.
   Please check with MW on what value we should expect in contract_type.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.84%. Comparing base (62bbc27) to head (bb7e53f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #11272   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.83%   82.84%           
=======================================
  Files        1659     1660    +1     
  Lines       59360    59376   +16     
  Branches     6232     6234    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        49170    49189   +19     
+ Misses      10190    10187    -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[undsoft]

First point was addressed, second point – wasn't.
You can find a link to MW PR with a list of all licenses in the ticket. It's my understanding that they'll be changed to UPPERCASE when being sent to UI.

[undsoft]

Tested with mocks, as there is some issue with webui.main.dashboard.sys_info endpoint.
This is good to merge after enum is updated.

[undsoft]

I presume BEST was added here as a mock data and is not an actual name of the contract type.
If so, it's better to replace it here with something else instead of adding a fake value to the enum.

[bugclerk]

This PR has been merged and conversations have been locked.
If you would like to discuss more about this issue please use our forums or raise a Jira ticket.