Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sync: Added
WeakSender
tosync::broadcast::channel
#7100base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
sync: Added
WeakSender
tosync::broadcast::channel
#7100Changes from all commits
2f7108e
fa1a027
8d18b3c
2e1d014
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Man, the orderings in this file are a mess. Mixing SeqCst and non-SeqCst orderings on the same atomic is not a good idea. The correct orderings for counters is:
We shouldn't need SeqCst for
num_tx
ever.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm sorry for that. There orderings and atomic operations are new for me so I copied it from
sync/mpsc
and tried to understand why the specific orderings where used there.Thank you for some explanation on what should be used instead! I will change the code accordingly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Re-reading your comment I noticed that you said that we don't need
SeqCst
fornum_tx
ever. That was not part of my PR but should I adjust it now here in the PR too?Edit.: I adjusted the orderings for
num_tx
too.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, it's not your fault. This problem is pre-existing.