Skip to content

Conversation

@adityamittal3107
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@adityamittal3107 adityamittal3107 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 22, 2025 06:45
@mnk-blr
Copy link
Collaborator

mnk-blr commented Oct 22, 2025

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @adityamittal3107, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new validation step for custom actions, specifically focusing on the length of action names. It adds a warning system to notify developers when a custom action name surpasses 30 characters, which is a common threshold for optimal UI display. The changes include the core logic for this check, the necessary type exports to support it, and a corresponding unit test to verify its correct behavior.

Highlights

  • Custom Action Name Length Warning: Implemented a new warning mechanism that alerts users if a custom action's name exceeds 30 characters, helping to prevent potential UI display or truncation issues.
  • Test Coverage: Added a dedicated test case to custom-actions.spec.ts to ensure the new warning functionality for long custom action names works as expected.
  • Type Exports: Exported CustomActionsPosition and CustomActionTarget types from all-types-export.ts to make them accessible for broader use within the application.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a warning when a custom action's name exceeds 30 characters. The implementation is correct and includes a test case. My feedback focuses on improving maintainability by replacing magic numbers with named constants and using a more functional approach for collecting warnings. These changes will make the code easier to read and update in the future.

Comment on lines +433 to +451
test('should warn when action name length exceeds 30 characters', () => {
// Arrange
const longName = 'A'.repeat(31);
const action: CustomAction = {
id: 'long-name-id',
name: longName,
target: CustomActionTarget.LIVEBOARD,
position: CustomActionsPosition.PRIMARY,
};

// Act
const result = getCustomActions([action]);

// Assert
expect(result.actions).toHaveLength(1);
expect(logger.warn).toHaveBeenCalledWith([
`Custom action name '${longName}' exceeds 30 characters. This may cause display or truncation issues in the UI.`
]);
});

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

To improve maintainability and readability, it's best to avoid magic numbers. The numbers 31 and 30 should be extracted into a named constant. This makes the test's intent clearer and simplifies future updates if the length limit changes.

While this introduces some duplication with the implementation file, it's a good step. Ideally, this constant would be shared between the implementation and the test file.

        test('should warn when action name length exceeds 30 characters', () => {
            // Arrange
            const MAX_ACTION_NAME_LENGTH = 30;
            const longName = 'A'.repeat(MAX_ACTION_NAME_LENGTH + 1);
            const action: CustomAction = {
                id: 'long-name-id',
                name: longName,
                target: CustomActionTarget.LIVEBOARD,
                position: CustomActionsPosition.PRIMARY,
            };

            // Act
            const result = getCustomActions([action]);

            // Assert
            expect(result.actions).toHaveLength(1);
            expect(logger.warn).toHaveBeenCalledWith([
                `Custom action name '${longName}' exceeds ${MAX_ACTION_NAME_LENGTH} characters. This may cause display or truncation issues in the UI.`
            ]);
        });

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/thoughtspot/visual-embed-sdk/@thoughtspot/visual-embed-sdk@335

commit: 44da337

@sonar-prod-ts
Copy link

sonar-prod-ts bot commented Oct 22, 2025

SonarQube Quality Gate

Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@adityamittal3107 adityamittal3107 merged commit cb0605f into main Oct 22, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants